Loading...
10-02-17 Town Council Packet Sup. Material powerpointObjections to the Enclave Minor PUD Amendment Application 1 Sketch Plan – Sec. 16A-5-320(c)(3) Staff shall meet with the applicant to provide preliminary comments discuss issues and concerns request additional information necessary to adequately evaluate the proposal and make recommendations regarding the application. 2 Sketch Plan – Sec. 16A-5-320(c)(3) The applicant will then have the opportunity to amend their application or provide additional information in response to the staff comments. 3 PUD General Restrictions – Sec. 16A-5-300(c) Greater Buildout Criteria - 16A-5-300(c)(4)(b) “ No buildout may be permitted to exceed one hundred percent . . . of the maximum number of future lots/units . . . except that under unique and exceptional circumstances, where it can be sufficiently demonstrated by the applicant, for good cause shown, the resulting development will exceed the PUD review criteria standards . . . .” 4 PUD General Restrictions – Sec. 16A-5-300(c) Greater Buildout Criteria - 16A-5-300(c)(4)(b) “ No buildout may be permitted to exceed one hundred percent . . . of the maximum number of future lots/units . . . except that under unique and exceptional circumstances, where it can be sufficiently demonstrated by the applicant, for good cause shown, the resulting development will exceed the PUD review criteria standards . . . .” 5 PUD General Restrictions – Sec. 16A-5-300(c) Greater Buildout Criteria - 16A-5-300(c)(4)(b) “ No buildout may be permitted to exceed one hundred percent . . . of the maximum number of future lots/units . . . except that under unique and exceptional circumstances, where it can be sufficiently demonstrated by the applicant, for good cause shown, the resulting development will exceed the PUD review criteria standards . . . .” 6 PUD General Restrictions – Sec. 16A-5-300(c) Greater Buildout Criteria - 16A-5-300(c)(4)(b) “No buildout may be permitted to exceed one hundred percent . . . of the maximum number of future lots/units . . . except that under unique and exceptional circumstances, where it can be sufficiently demonstrated by the applicant, for good cause shown, the resulting development will exceed the PUD review criteria standards . . . .” 7 PUD Review Standards – Sec. 16A-5-310 Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Preservation of community character Creative approach Landscaping Comply with development evaluation standards Suitability for development Spatial pattern shall be efficient Phasing Construction interruptions 8 PUD Review Standards – Sec. 16A-5-310 Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Preservation of community character Creative approach Landscaping Comply with development evaluation standards Suitability for development Spatial pattern shall be efficient Phasing Construction interruptions 9 PUD Review Standards – Sec. 16A-5-310 Preservation of Community Character - 16A-5-310(2) “ The development proposed shall be consistent with the Building Design Guidelines to Preserve Community Character, Sec. 16A-4-340 the proposed development shall be compatible with, or an enhancement of, the character of existing land uses in the area.” 10 Building Design Guidelines – 16A-4-340 Views - 16A-5-340(c)(5) “Buildings should be oriented to take advantage of views . . . but should also preserve important sight lines, overlooks and landmarks as viewed from public roadways and other public spaces, and as viewed from neighboring developments.” 11 PUD Review Standards – Sec. 16A-5-310 Preservation of Community Character - 16A-5-310(2) “The development proposed shall be consistent with the Building Design Guidelines to Preserve Community Character, Sec. 16A-4-340 the proposed development shall be compatible with, or an enhancement of, the character of existing land uses in the area.” 12 13 14 PUD Review Standards – Sec. 16A-5-310 Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Preservation of community character Creative approach Landscaping Comply with development evaluation standards Suitability for development Spatial pattern shall be efficient Phasing Construction interruptions 15 Purpose: 16A-5-300(a)(2) & (7) The purpose of the PUD process is to: “Allow a developer variations from certain requirements of the underlying zone district, provided such variations are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will result in benefits for the community”; and “Allow flexibility for landowners to beneficially plan for the overall development of their land to the extent that the final product presents a net positive result for the community.” 16 Comprehensive Plan – Ch. 7 Consider limitations of growth before a decision may be made. Minimize the negative visual impacts of development. Consider long-range goals and community needs when making specific land use decisions. Make decisions that best serve the resort and the community over the long term. Preserve the community character of Snowmass Village through intelligent land use, sensitive design, compatible mass, scale, and density, and full evaluation and mitigation of impacts caused by new development. 17 18 Let’s Ask Mel 19 20 21 Community Benefits? Average time on market: Snowmass . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386 days Aspen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250 days Basalt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201 days Carbondale . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 days Glenwood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 days 22