Loading...
10-16-00 Town Council Packet SNOWMASS VILLAGE TOWN COUNCIL IPA c refiv r WORK SESSION 10-16-2000 2:00 - 3:00 P.M. ARTICLE V, LAND USE CODE DISCUSSION -- Chris Conrad. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 9 3:00 - 3:15 WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT DISCUSSION -- Gary Suiter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Page 1 3:15 - 3:45 COMMUNITY POOL DISCUSSION -- Gary Suiter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Page 4 3:45 - 4:00 BREAK SNOWMASS VILLAGE TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 10-16-2000 CALL TO ORDER AT 4:00 P.M. Item No. 1: ROLL CALL Item No. 2: PUBLIC NON-AGENDA ITEMS (5-Minute Time Limit) Item No. 3: PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING ON ORDINANCE NO. 15. SERIES OF 2000 TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT AND SECOND READING ACTION ON AN ORDIANCE AMENDING AND RESTATING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE V OF CHAPTER 16A OF THE SNOWMASS VILLAGE MUNICIPAL CODE -- Chris Conrad. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Page 9 Item No. 4: PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING ACTION ON ORDINANCE NO. 20, SERIES OF 2000 TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT AND SECOND READING ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE GRANTING THE SNOWMASS VILLAGE HOUSING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONAL AUTHORIZATION TO COMMENCE CERTAIN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN PARCEL N, FARAWAY RANCH GROSS PARCEL PLAT -- Chris Conrad. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 104 COUNCIL COMMUNIQUE Meeting Date: October 16, 2000 Presented By: Gary Suiter/Steve Connor Subject: Water and Sanitation District Intergovernmental Agreement Discussion Overview: Attached is a draft of the proposed Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the Water and Sanitation District. This agreement reflects the direction provided by Council concerning building permit fee waivers and discounted system development fees for Town projects. Please let me know your thoughts on this concept and if this is consistent with your expectations. Recommendation: Review and discuss. Provide staff with any proposed changes for consideration at the Regular Meeting. III Exhibit "A" INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the Town of Snowmass Village, Colorado, a Colorado home rule municipality, whose address is Post Office Box 5010, Snowmass Village, Colorado 81615, hereinafter referred to as the "Town", and the Snowmass Water and Sanitation District, a Colorado special district, whose address is Post Office Box 5700, Snowmass Village, Colorado 81615, hereinafter referred to as the "District". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, this Agreement is authorized by the provisions of Section 29-1-201, C.R.S., et seq., concerning intergovernmental relationships; and WHEREAS, the Town is authorized to enter into this Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions of Section 1.4 of Article I of the Town Home Rule Charter; and WHEREAS, the District is authorized to enter into this Agreement in accordance with the provisions of Section 32-1-1001(1)(d) C.R.S.; and WHEREAS, the Town and the District have determined that the establishment of an intergovernmental relationship to determine the most efficient and effective use of the assets, powers and responsibilities of the Town and the District through cooperation; and WHEREAS, both the Town and the District are political subdivisions within the meaning of Section 29-1-202(2) C.R.S.; and WHEREAS, the Town and the District have approved the entrance into this Agreement by the adoption of Resolution No. 31, Series of 2000 and Resolution No. 6, Series of 2000, respectively; and WHEREAS, the Town and the District have determined that an agreement setting forth which fees are to be paid by each political subdivision for services from the other benefits the public health, safety and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties, and for other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Fees for Services. The Town and the District shall pay all applicable fees and charges of the other, except as follows: a. The Town shall pay the following: -a - Res 00-31 Exhibit "A" i. The system development fee for potable water and sanitary sewer service shall be 30% of the system development fee set forth in the Rules and Regulations of the District. In the event that the Town facility is converted to a private facility, then at the time of conversion, a system development fee in the amount of 70% of the then existing rate shall be paid. ii. The Town shall be responsible for the payment of all cost and expense to physically connect the Town facility to the District system. iii. Service fees shall be determined in accordance with the Equivalent Residential Unit(EQR)schedule at the standard rate at set forth in the Rules and Regulations of the District. b. The District shall pay the cost of outside consultants actually incurred by the Town employed to assist the Building Official perform his duties as defined in Chapter 18 of the Town of Snowmass Village Municipal Code in lieu of the fees prescribed therein. 2. Termination. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, unless sooner terminated by either the Town or the District by providing ninety (90) advance written notice of termination to the non-terminating party. 3. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 2000 irrespective of the date this Agreement is actually executed. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused their respective names to be hereunto subscribed by their respective managers. Town of Snowmass Village Snowmass Water and Sanitation District By: By: Gary Suiter, Town Manager Richard G. Wall, District Manager Dated on October_, 2000 Dated on October_, 2000 -3 ' COUNCIL COMMUNIQUE Meeting Date: October 16, 2000 Presented By: Gary Suiter/Carey Shanks Subject: Community Pool Discussion Overview: We anticipate that a conceptual site plan and rendering will be available by meeting time. Staff has prepared a conceptual budget (attached) for the pool and we would like Council feedback on these numbers. Much of the background information was generated through statewide research and these numbers represent our best educated guess for annual income and expenses. Our goal was to identify what the approximate annual general fund subsidy would be for this facility. Recommendation: Review and discuss. Provide feedback as to whether these number pass the "test of reasonableness". y ' 10/12/00 Narrative: Pool Revenue and Expenses This narrative will hopefully answer questions with regard to how this report was put together. While confident in this report, please note this information is conceptual and is subject to change. After researching available national information, it was decided to concentrate on local and regional numbers, (Basalt, Carbondale, Glenwood Springs and Hotchkiss) . This is due to the fact of our unique local economies and our .above average costs . A few assumptions need to be noted: • Numbers focus on local and regional community pool information • Admissions revenues based on 100 swim days • People per day: Total pop. of 2000 x 30 = 60 people per day • Numbers put together without definitive pool size Lastly, particular information was found to be common among a majority of community pools, as highlighted below: Concessions / Vending: I was warned against optimistic concessions revenue. The main reason cited was the ratio of capital costs to anticipated revenues based on relatively small daily admissions numbers. In many cases the community has replaced expensive concession equipment with vending machines, as well as contract services. This reduces liability with respect to capital costs as well as overhead. "Water by itself will not bring people. " This emphasizes the need to offer different services, programs, etc. in order to attract people to the pool. Comments included shaded areas, grass, deck space, and programs such as swim lessons, day-care, lifeguard training, teen night and other youth activities . Should anyone have questions, comments or suggestions please feel free to contact Carey. . S_ P: \shared\Clerk\Asst. Manager\Pool\Narrativespread.doc Community Pool Projected Annual Costs Subject to Change 2001 Acct. No. Account Description Projected Description Full Time Wages 53500 (rounded up) Manager ($14 1hr x 8 x 120 days=$13,440) Lifeguards ($10/hr x 8 x 100 days x 5 guards=$40,000) Part Time Wages 10000 Instructors ($8 1hr x 4 x 100 days x 2 instructors=$6,400) Counter (possibly under contract) Maint. ($1 0 1hr x 4 x 90 days=$3,600) FICA 12700 @ 20% Subtotal Personnel 76200 Printing 1000 Copier Supplies 200 Misc. office supplies 300 Water, sewer, sent. 6400 $1600 a quarter Life Guard Uniforms 750 Utilities 15500 electric,gas and phone Chemicals 6000 average between two different sized pools Special Events 1000 town providing support for events Maint. Repair 2500 Maint. Supplies 1750 Program Equip. 2000 separate amenities needs Postage 100 Red Cross Certification 750 certifying lifeguards Advertising 1500 for special events, grand opening Safety, Med. Supplies 750 Rental Items 500 flotation devises, goggles, etc. Property Insurance 4000 best guess Subtotal O&M 45000 Contingency @ 10% 12,120 Total for Pool 133,320 Conceptual Revenues Subject to Change Item Amount Descriptions Daily Admissions 26,000 2 years and under are free (youth-35 1day x 100 days @$4.00=$14,000) 12 years and under (adult-25/day x 100 days @$5.00=$12,000) 13 years and up Summer Pass 28625 (youth-50 @$199/each) (adults/family-75 @$249/each) V Punch Pass(20 days, ) 10750 (youth-100 @$65/each) (adult-50 @$85 1each) Private Pool Rentals 750 Parties, teen nite, etc. Concessions/Vending Profits 4500 Contracted out Classes: swimming, kayak, etc. 1500 Classes should at least offset costs Pay Phone 200 Rentals: lockers, equipment, etc. 1000 Total Annual Revenues 73,325 (Less Expenses) 133320 General Fund Subsidy -59,995 spread TOWN OF SNOWMASS VILLAGE TOWN COUNCIL CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING WHEN: MONDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2000 (Continued from October 2, 2000) WHERE: SNOWMASS VILLAGE TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 0016 KEARNS ROAD 2ND FLOOR SNOWMASS CENTER BUILDING WHY: TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON: TOWN COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 15, SERIES OF 2000, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RESTATING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE V OF CHAPTER 16A OF THE SNOWMASS VILLAGE MUNICIPAL CODE TIME: AT A MEETING WHICH BEGINS AT 4 : 00 P.M. THE EXACT TIME OF THE HEARING WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE AGENDA. CODE: This application will be processed as an amendment to the text of the Land Use and Development Code, pursuant to Section 16A-5-210 of the Snowmass Village Municipal Code. INFO: A copy of the proposed amendments is on file and available for review in the Snowmass Village Community Development Department at the above address. For further information call 923-5524 . Trudi Worline, Town Clerk Change Posted and Published in the Snowmass Sun on 10-04-2000 http: //www. tosv.com clerk @tosv. com g ' COUNCIL COMMUNIQUE Meeting Date: October 16, 2000 Presented By: Planning Division Chris Conrad, Planning Director Subject: Public Hearing and Second Reading: Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2000, an ordinance amending and restating certain provisions of Article V of Chapter 16A of the Snowmass Village Municipal Code. Background: Article V of the Land Use Code was last discussed and first reading of Ordinance No. 15 occurred on September 25. The Public Hearing was then continued to this meeting in order to receive final public comment prior to second reading. Comments: The text within the ordinance that are currently stricken or underlined reflect changes directed at the last meeting or proposed final changes recommended by staff. You will note that a rather substantive addition has been made to the portion of the Planned Unit Development regulations relating to Maximum Buildout. Staff is recommending consideration of the amendment as a possible alternative to amending the Comprehensive Plan buildout analysis chart. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed code amendments Planning at their October 11 meeting. Their primary concerns related to the Commission maximum buildout portion of the PUD regulations, particularly the Recommendation: amendment from 85% to 65% and the Unit Equivalency Chart. They felt that the chart was too abstract as these kinds of mathematical formulations often have unintended consequences unless better understood. They request that consideration be given to removing that portion of the proposed amendments from final adoption at this time as they would like to test it against existing properties and under various development scenarios. The Planning Commission also noted that virtually all land use processes will go to the Town Council for final determination. Recognizing that the Town Council meetings have been quite lengthy lately, they would be more than willing to handle more of the minor development reviews so that they need not go to the Town Council in all cases. Recommendation: Staff recommends concluding the public hearing and granting second reading approval of the enclosed ordinance. P:\user\cconrad\MS Word Docs\Article V LUC Amendments TCMemo05 w TOWN OF SNOWMASS VILLAGE TOWN COUNCIL ORDINANCE No. 15 SERIES OF 2000 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RESTATING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE V OF CHAPTER 16A OF THE SNOWMASS VILLAGE MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, amendments to Chapter 16A contained in this Ordinance are being processed under the provisions of Section 5-210(C)(7) of Chapter 16A of the Snowmass Village Municipal Code (the"Municipal Code"); and WHEREAS,the Town Council directed the Planning Staff to propose amendments to Article V of Chapter 16A of the Municipal Code, and to prepare this Ordinance to formalize the amendments; and WHEREAS, the Town Council referred the amendments to the Planning Commission after first reading for comment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the amendments and made its recommendations regarding the amendments to the Town Council at its meeting occurring on September 20, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Town Council reviewed the recommendations of the Planning Commission on October 2, 2000; and WHEREAS, notice of a Public Hearing to be held on October 2, 2000 was published in the Snowmass Sun, in accordance with the provisions of Sections 16A-5- 60(B)(1) and 16A-5-210(C)(6) of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was held on that date in order to receive public comment concerning the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS,the Town Council has considered the application,all relevant support materials, the report of the Town Staff, the Planning Commission recommendations and public testimony given at the Public Hearing; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that this Ordinance complies with the provisions of Section 16A-5-210(E) of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS,the Town Council finds that the procedure and requirements set forth in Section 16A-5-210 of the Municipal Code have been satisfied; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the adoption of this Ordinance is / 0 00 TC Ord.00-15 Page 2 necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Town Council of the Town of Snowmass Village, as follows: 1. Amendment to Chapter 16A,Article V.The provisions of Chapter 16A Article IV of the Municipal Code are hereby amended and restated as follows: ARTICLE V Review Procedures Division 1. Common Review Procedures See. 16A-5-10. Purpose. The purpose of Division 1,Common Review Procedures,is to establish the procedures that apply to all development applications within the Town. These common procedures apply to the following types of development applications: interpretations, amendments to the text of the Land Use and Development Code,amendments to the Official Zone District Map,planned unit developments(PUD) and PUD amendments, special reviews, variances, administrative modifications, subdivision exemptions,subdivisions and subdivision amendments and temporary use permits. (Ord.4-1998§1) Sec. 16A-5-20. Overview of common development review procedure. (a) Common Procedure. Figure 5-1,Common Review Procedure,generally illustrates how the Town processes land development applications and the activities an applicant may have to complete in order to obtain approval of a development application. In general,the steps that comprise the common procedure are as follows: (1) Attend pre-application conference; (2) Submit application; (3) Staff reviews application; (4) Provision of public notice; (5) Action by decision-making body; and (6) Actions following development approval. The following sections of this Division describe the common procedures associated with each of these steps. (b) How the Common Procedure Applies to Particular Applications. Table 5-1, Summary of Development Review Procedures,indicates how certain elements of the common procedure apply to am I ) ' TC Ord.00-15 Page 3 each type of application. It describes whether the pre-application conference is mandatory or optional for each type of application,which body is authorized to review,act upon or hear appeals for each type of application and whether public notice is required for the application. (Ord.4-1998§1;Ord.6-1999 §1) TC Ord.00-15 Page 4 Figure 5-1 Common Review Procedure Attend Pre-Application Conference Submit Application <__ Correct Defects T Notify Applicant Of Deficiencies TNot Planning Director Review for Completeness __> Complete Planning Director Certifies as Complete Referral to Local, Staff Review of Set Public Hearing State, and Federal Application Date and Provide Agencies Public Notice Prepare tall Report Hearing By Review Body(ies) Approve, Approve Conditionally, Table, or Deny Application Submit Documents For Recordation (when applicable) Apply for Building Permit 13 ' TC Ord.00-15 Page 5 TABLE 5-1 SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES Application Type Pre- Role of Recommending(R), Public Notice Application Decision-Making(DM)and Required?' Conference? Appeal(A)Bodies Staff Planning Town Comm. Council Interpretation(See.16A-1-70) Optional DM A No Amendment to Text of Development Optional R R DM Yes(for Town Code(Sec.16A-5-210)or to the Council second Official Zone District Map(Sec.16A- reading of 5-220) ordinance) PUD Sketch Plan(See.16A-5-320) Mandatory R R DM Yes(for joint meeting and for Town Council resolution) PUD Preliminary Plan(Sec.16A-5- Mandatory R R DM Yes(for Planning 340) Commission and Town Council) PUD Final Plan(Sec.16A-5-360) Optional R DM No PUD Amendment(Sec.16A-5-390) Mandatory DM R DM Yes for Minor and for Major or R Major Minor Special Review(Sec.16A-5-230) Mandatory R' DMZ Yes(for staff or Town Council)' Variance(Sec.16A-5-240) Optional R DM A Yes(for Planning Commission) Administrative Modification Optional DM' A Yes' (Sec.16A-5-250) Zonin&Plan Review(Sec.16A-5-270) Optional DM' DM/A No Subdivision Exemption(Article V, Optional R DM No Division 5) Subdivision(Article V,Division 4) Mandatory R R DM Yes(for Planning Commission) Subdivision Amendment(Sec.16A-5- Mandatory DM DM Yes for Minor and 450) for Minor and R Major Major Annual Temporary Use(Sec.16A-5- Mandatory R R DM Yes(for Town 260) Council) Administrative Temporary Use(Sec. Optional DM A No 16A-5-260) _fy . TC Ord.00-15 Page 6 Notes: 1. Public notice shall be given as specified in Section 16A-5-60,Notice of Public Hearings. 2. Staff is the primary decision-snaking body for administrative modification,site plan and special review applications. However,the staff may refer any administrative modification to the Planning Commission or special review application to the Planning Commission and Town Council if issues arise whereby the Planning Director deems referral to be appropriate. In such cases action shall be by the Planning Commission at a public hearing for administrative modifications,at a reeulaz meeting by thg designated decision-making body ein either the Planning Commission or Town Council for zones Ip an reviews or by the Town Council at a public hearing for special review. 3. Required notice shall be given as noted in Table 5-2. See. 16A-5-30. Pre-application conference. (a) General. At the pre-application conference the applicant may confer with the Planning Director to obtain information and guidance as to the Town's development procedures and standards. Table 5-1,Summary of Development Review Procedures,lists the application types for which a pre- application conference is mandatory and those for which it is optional. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to schedule the pre-application conference. (b) Purpose of Pre-Application Conference. The purpose of the pre-application conference is to determine,in general,what provisions of this Development Code apply to the proposed development. (c) Contents of Pre-Application Conference. Items to be discussed during the pre-application conference include the following: (1) Applicant's proposal. The applicant should provide a verbal description of the proposed development, accompanied by a survey, site plan or other map that illustrates the property's boundaries and the applicant's initial development concepts. The applicant should also provide a general indication of when the application is likely to be submitted. (2) Review procedure. The Planning Director should identify the procedures that will apply to the proposed development,including which decision-making body or bodies will review the application,whether public notice will be required and the sequence of actions and the likely time required to complete the development review process. (3) Review agencies. The Planning Director should identify those agencies that will review the development application. Upon request,the Planning Director shall provide the applicant with the names of contact persons at these agencies. (4) Application contents. The Planning Director should describe the materials required to be submitted as part of the development application,provide any applicable Town application forms, identify the number of copies of the application to be submitted and indicate the fee for the development application. (d) Written Summary. Upon request by the applicant,the Planning Director shall,within seven (7)calendar days,issue a written summary of the specific procedures and information requirements for the project. (Ord.4-1998 §1) so Is - TC Ord.00-15 Page 7 Sec. 16A-5-40. Submission of application. (a) Authorization. A development application may only be submitted to the Community Development Department by the owner,or any other person having recognized interest in the land for which the development is proposed,or their authorized agent. (1) Owner's Permission. If the applicant is not the owner of the land, or is a contract purchaser of the land, the applicant shall submit a letter signed by the owner consenting to the submission of the application. If the applicant is not the sole owner of the land,the applicant shall submit a letter signed by the other owners,or an association representing the owners,consenting to or joining in the development application. (b) Minimum Contents. The development application shall include the information and materials specified for that particular type of application in the applicable section of this Article V. In addition, all development applications shall,at a minimum,include the following information and materials: (1) Name,address,telephone number and power of attorney. The applicant's name,address and telephone number. If the applicant is to be represented by an agent, a letter signed by the applicant granting power of attorney to the agent shall be submitted, authorizing the agent to represent the applicant and stating the representative's name,address and phone number. (2) Legal description. The legal description and street address,if such exists,of the parcel on which development is proposed. (3) Disclosure of ownership. A current certificate from a title insurance company or attorney licensed in the State which shall set forth the names of all owners of property included in the application and shall include a list of all mortgages,judgments, liens, contracts, easements or agreements of record that affect the property. At the Town's option,the holders or owners of such mortgages,judgments, liens, contracts, easements or agreements of record may be required to consent to the application before it is acted upon by the Town. (4) Written description. A written description of the proposal and an explanation,in written, graphic or model form, of how the proposed development complies with the review standards applicable to the application,found in the applicable section of this Article V. (5) Vicinity map. An eight and one-half inch by eleven inch (8'/z' x 11") vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the Town. (6) Other maps. All other maps required for the application shall be prepared at a scale of one inch equals one hundred feet(1" = 100)or larger,on sheets no larger than thirty inches by forty- two inches(30" x 42"),with an unencumbered margin of one and one-half inches(1.5")on the left hand side of the sheet and one-half inch(0.5")around the other three(3)sides of the sheet. Sheets of twenty-four by thirty-six inches(24" x 36")are preferred. If it is necessary to place information on more than one(1)sheet,an index shall be included on the first sheet. Report-size versions of all maps,reduced to a sheet size of no greater than eleven inches by seventeen inches(11"x 17"),shall also be submitted. (7) Base fee. The application shall be accompanied by the applicable base fee from the 1�- TC Ord.00-15 Page 8 Community Development Department's fee schedule. The fee schedule shall be established and may be revised from time-to-time by the Planning Director. The fee schedule shall be available for review in the Community Development Department during normal business hours. a. Actual fee. The actual review fee shall be computed by the Planning Director,based upon a staff hourly rate determined by the Planning Director to be an estimate of the fully allocated hourly cost of review of the application by the Town staff, plus the actual costs incurred by the Town in employing consultants, including attorneys and engineers, performing services for the Town directly related to the application. b. Reimbursement due. The applicant shall reimburse the Town for such amounts in excess of the base fee as determined by the Planning Director. The reimbursement to the Town by the applicant shall be due and payable within fifteen(15)days of the date of billing. (c) Consolidation. The Town's development review process is intended to encourage efficient processing of applications. Applicants may request, and the Planning Director may permit, the consolidated submission and review of all necessary development applications for a parcel of land. The Planning Director is authorized to waive any overlapping submission requirements in the consolidated review. (Ord.4-1998 §1) Sec. 16A-5-50. Staff review of application. (a) Determination of Completeness. The Planning Director shall determine whether the application is complete and includes information in sufficient detail to determine whether it complies with the applicable substantive standards of this Development Code. The Planning Director shall endeavor to make said determination and notify the applicant accordingly within fifteen(15)days of receiving the application. (1) Incomplete Application. If the application is not complete,the Planning Director shall inform the applicant of the deficiencies in writing within 15 days and shall take no further action on the application until the deficiencies are remedied. The Town Council,upon the recommendation of the Planning Director,may authorize the waiver or deferral of the requirement to submit certain application items if determined that they are not necessary to commence review of the application. The authorization of the waiver or deferral request by the Town Council shall occur by adopting a resolution at a regularly scheduled meeting and shall reserve the right for the Town to require that any material initially waived or deferred may be required to be submitted by the applicant at any time during the review process if needed to evaluate the applicant's proposal. If the applicant fails to correct the deficiencies within sixty(60)days,the application shall be considered withdrawn and returned to the applicant. (2) Complete Application. If the application is complete,the Planning Director shall certify as complete,and assign the application an agenda date with the applicable review body. (3) Completeness is not a determination of compliance. A determination that an application is complete shall not constitute a determination that it complies with the substantive standards of this Development Code. (b) Staff Review. Within thirty(30)days from the date of the completeness determination,the ,P- Ow TC Ord.00-15 Page 9 Planning Director shall review the development application to determine its conformance with the requirements of this Development Code. The Planning Director may solicit the professional analysis and recommendations of any other agency,organization or technical consultant deemed appropriate and necessary to complete the review,such as: (1)members of the Town staff;(2)county,state or federal entities having an interest in or authority over the proposed development or any portion thereof; (3)utility companies,special service districts serving the proposed development and the school district; and(4)engineers,designers and legal consultants. (c) Report. Prior to the date of the review body meeting,the Planning Director shall compile a written report that sets forth how the application complies with,or does not comply with,the applicable standards of this Development Code. At least three (3) days prior to the first public review of the application,the Planning Director shall distribute a copy of the report to each member of the review body and to the applicant, and shall make the report available to the public. (Ord. 4-1998 §1) Sec. 16A-5-60. Notice of public hearings. (a) Notice Required. Table 5-1,Summary of Development Review Procedures,identifies the types of land development applications that require a public hearing,and at what step during the review process that hearing shall occur. Public notice shall be provided for each application type that is listed as requiring notice to be given. Notice shall be provided as specified below. (b) Manner and Timing of Notice. Public notice shall be given by publication of notice in the newspaper,mailing of notice to property owners surrounding the subject property and posting of notice on the property,as specified herein. The number of days prior to the hearing that each type of notice must be given is summarized in Table 5-2,Timing of Required Public Notices. (1) Publication of notice. Publication of notice shall be accomplished by the staff,who shall place a legal notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the Town. The legal notice shall state the date,time, location and purpose of the public hearing,and the name of the decision-making body conducting the hearing and shall be published once. (2) Mailing of notice. Mailing of notice shall be accomplished by the applicant. The notice that the applicant shall mail shall be prepared by the Planning Director and provided to the applicant. Notice shall be sent by first class mail to all property owners with properties located wholly or in part within three hundred(300)feet of the subject property.In certain circumstances involving larger parcels,the Planning Directormay define the three hundred(300)foot notification boundary to be measured from the perimeter of the proposed project or area within the property . being affected by the proposed development,rather than being measured from the entire property boundary. a. Source of list. The applicant shall compile the list of property owners to whom notice will be mailed by using the most current list of property owners on file with the County Tax Assessor. b. Contents of mailed notice. The notice that is mailed shall contain the following information: 1. Description of proposal. A description of the proposed application, including a —/S 4P TC Ord.00-15 Page 10 reference to the Code section under which the application will be processed and the name of the decision-making body that will conduct the hearing. An exhibit depicting the proposed development shall also be included. 2. Description of property. A description of the subject property. 3. Date time and place. The date, time and place of the public hearing for which notice is being given. 4. Map amendment. If the application is for an amendment to the Official Zone District Map,a map illustrating the proposed amendment shall be included with the mailed notice. The notice shall state what the present zoning is and what the new zoning will be and shall set forth the dimensional limitations for the proposed zone, as established in this Code. 5. Subdivision. If the application is for approval of a subdivision,the notice shall specify the proposed types of uses and gross residential density. 6. Additional hearings. The written notice shall also state that additional public hearings may be held before the Planning Commission and/or Town Council at later dates, for which only published notice shall be required,and shall indicate that additional information regarding the proposal is available for inspection at the Town offices during normal business hours. 7. Contact person. The address and telephone number of the Community Development Department,and the name of the person to whom written comments should be directed prior to the public hearing. (3) Posting of notice. Posting ofnotice shall be accomplished by the applicant. The applicant shall obtain a copy of the sign from the staff or shall use a form approved by the staff. The applicant shall enter onto the sign the date,time,location and purpose of the public hearing, and the name of the decision-making body conducting the hearing. The applicant shall post the sign in a conspicuous location on the subject property. a. Dimensions. The dimensions of the sign shall be not less than twenty-two inches wide by twenty-six inches high(22"x 26"). Lettering on the sign shall be not less than one(1) inch in height. b. Materials. The materials to which the notice form is affixed shall be sturdy and waterproof or shall have a waterproof covering. The applicant shall maintain the sign in a legible manner until the closure of the public hearing and shall remove it on the day following closure of the public hearing. (4) Validity of notice. If the applicant follows the procedures indicated above in good faith, the failure of any particular property owner to receive notice shall not affect the validity of the proceedings which require such notice. By way of example, notice shall not be considered invalid because of unrecorded or subsequent transfers of title,or uncertainties concerning ownership not discernible from the tax assessment rolls. do to TC Ord.00-15 Page 11 (5) Proof of notice. At or before the actual public hearing,the applicant shall provide the Town with an affidavit certifying that notice was posted. A copy of the list of property owners to whom notice was mailed shall be attached to the affidavit. A photograph of the posted sign shall also be attached to the affidavit. (Ord.4-1998§1;Ord.6-1999§1; Ord. 10-1999 §1) i TC Ord.00-15 Page 12 TABLE 5-2 TIMING OF REQUIRED PUBLIC NOTICES Days Prior To Hearing That Public Notice Most Be Given Application Type Published Mailed- Posted Amendment to 30 No No Comprehensive Plan - interpretation- No No No Amendment to Text of 15 No No Development Code Amendment to Official 15 30 15 Zone District Map PUD Sketch Plan. 10' No No (Planning Commission) PUD Sketch Plan(Town 10 10 10 Council) PUD Preliminary Plan 30 30 15 PUD Final Plan No No No PUD Amendment 15 30(Major) 15 15(Minor) Special Review 15 15 Is Variance 30 30 IS Administrative No 151 No Modification Subdivision Exemption No No No Subdivision 30 30 15 Subdivision 30 30 IS Amendment Annual Temporary Use 15 No 15 Administrative No No No Temporary Use Comprehensive Sign is 15 No Plan I No public hearing occurs before the Planning Commission;the required public notice is for the joint meeting,pursuant to Section I6A-5-320(4),Joint Meeting. 2 Mailed notice shall be by certified mail and return labels shall be presented to the Planning Director prior to public hearing. A go TC Ord.00-15 Page 13 Sec. 16A-5-70. Action by decision-making body. The decision-making body shall comply with the following procedures in taking action on the development application. (a) Site inspection. As part of its consideration of the development application,the decision- making body may,as a group or through a committee appointed for that purpose,inspect the site of the proposed development. Upon reasonable request by the Planning Director,the applicant shall mark the development site before the site visit is to occur to locate property boundaries,building envelopes and other key site development features. (b) Conduct of public hearing. A public hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the following procedures: a. Rights of all persons. Any person may appear at a public hearing and submit evidence, either individually or as a representative of an organization. b. Order of proceedings. The order of the proceedings shall be as follows: 1. Description. The Planning Director shall present a narrative and/or graphic description of the application and a staff report on the application, which includes a written recommendation. 2. Applicant presentation. The applicant shall be prepared to present any information that has been previously submitted in the application or that is_pertinent to the review bb's consideration of the application.The Chairman conducting the public hearing may define the scope, topical nature and time frame within which the presentation shall be given. The burden shall be on the applicant to demonstrate through competent evidence that the application complies with all applicable provisions of this Development Code. 3. Public testimony. Public testimony shall be heard. 4. Applicant response. The applicant may respond to any testimony or evidence presented by the public. 5. Staff response. The Planning Director and any other staff member may respond to any statement made by the applicant or the public. c. Exclusion of testimony. The Chairman conducting the public hearing may exclude testimony or evidence that is found to be irrelevant,immaterial or unduly repetitious. If any testimony or evidence is so excluded,the person offering such testimony or evidence shall have an opportunity to make a proffer in regard to such testimony or evidence for the record. Such proffer shall be made at the public hearing. d. Continuance of public hearing. The body conducting the public hearing may,on its own motion or at the request of the applicant,continue the public hearing to a fixed date,time and place. An applicant shall have the right to request and be granted one(1)continuance. All subsequent continuances shall be granted at the discretion of the body conducting the public au TC Ord.00-15 Page 14 hearing only upon good cause shown. e. Withdrawal of application. An applicant shall have the right to withdraw an application at any time prior to the action on the application by the decision-making body. f. Record of public hearing. The body conducting the public hearing shall record the public hearing by any appropriate means,including transcription,audio tape or videotape. The written or taped record of oral proceedings,including testimony and statements of personal opinions; the minutes of the Clerk; all applications, exhibits and papers submitted in any proceeding before the decision-making,administrative or advisory body;the staff report and the decision of the body shall constitute the record. (3) Action. After hearing the evidence and considering the comments of all persons interested in the matter,the decision-making body shall make its decision and findings and have them entered in its minutes. The decision-making body shall not be required to take final action on an application during the same meeting when testimony from interested persons is taken,but action shall be taken as promptly as is reasonable. a. Findings. In its findings,the decision-making body shall report the facts,whether the application complies with the applicable review standards, and whether the application is approved, approved with conditions, recommended for approval by another body, tabled pending receipt of additional information or denied. b. Copy to applicant. A copy of the decision-making body's decision shall be provided to the applicant within a reasonable period of time after the decision has been made. (4) Inactive applications. The decision-making body may deny any application that remains inactive. An application may be deemed inactive and be denied when the decision-making body determines that the applicant is not making reasonable progress in moving the application towards final approval. a. Determination of inactivity. A project shall be considered inactive if more than two(2) months have passed since a written request for additional information was made by the Planning Director or the review body,and the request has not been complied with,or more than three(3) months have passed since the last official contact between the applicant and the decision- making body. b. Written notice.The Planning Director shall provide written notice,fifteen(15)days in advance,to the applicant stating the time,place and date when the decision-making body will consider denial of the application due to its inactivity. (Ord.4-1998 §1) See. 16A-5-80. Appeals. (a) General. Table 5-1,Summary of Development Review Procedures,identifies those types of actions by decision-making bodies that may be appealed. Appeals of actions by decision-making bodies shall comply with the following procedures. (b) Written Appeal. An appeal of an action by a decision-making body shall be submitted in •iO 410 TC Ord.00-15 Page 15 writing to the Planning Director within fifteen(15)days after the date of the decision being appealed. The written appeal shall state the basis of the appeal in detail,and the relief that is requested,and shall include any materials or evidence to support the appeal. (c) Standing to Appeal. The following persons shall be deemed to have standing to submit an appeal: (1) Applicant. The applicant or the owner of the property; (2) Person who testified. Any parties in interest who testified at the public hearing on the application; or (3) Person who submitted written comments. Any parties in interest who submitted written comments on the application before final action was taken, excluding persons who only signed petitions or form letters. (d) Procedure. The appeal shall be heard by the body authorized to hear the appeal at a regularly scheduled meeting within thirty (30) days after the date of the filing of the written appeal. The Planning Director shall inform the applicant, the appellant, and anyone who testified at the public hearing or submitted written comments on the application of the date,time and place of the meeting. The body hearing the appeal shall either affirm,affirm with modifications or reverse the original action. The original action shall only be modified or reversed if it is determined that: (1) there is not substantial evidence in the record to support the original decision, or (2) the original action was inconsistent with the applicable provisions of this Land Use and Development Code. The decision of the appellate body shall be final and shall not be further appealed,but may be subject to review by the courts pursuant to law. (Ord.4-1998 §1) Sec. 16A-5-90. Vested property rights. (a) General. Consistent with the provisions of Section 24-68-101 et seq., C.R.S., a vested property right shall attach to and run with the applicable real property upon the approval of a site specific development plan. (b) Site Specific Development Plan. A site specific development plan,for the purpose of vesting a property right under Section 24-68-102(4),C.R.S.,shall specifically include the following: (1) Final PUD plan. A final planned unit development plan approved pursuant to Article V, Division 3,Planned Unit Development. (2) Subdivision. A final plat of a subdivision approved pursuant to Article V,Division 4, Subdivision Regulations. (3) Special review. A special review use approved pursuant to Section 16A-5-230,Special Review. Where none of the foregoing approvals is required by the nature of an application for any land use approval,the final approval granted by resolution of the Town Council shall be deemed a site specific development plan,except that under no circumstances shall a variance be deemed to be a site specific O we TC Ord.00-15 Page 16 development plan. Furthermore, the establishment of a zoning designation or a zone district with respect to any real property,either original or by an amendment to the Official Zone District Map or to the text of this Development Code, shall not constitute a site specific development plan,unless the amendment is approved simultaneously with any of the specific types of approvals listed above. (c) Conditional Approval. Approval of a site specific development plan may be made with or without condition,and the failure to fully abide by the terms of any conditional approval will result in a forfeiture of a vested property right. (d) Term of Vested Right. Rights which have been vested as provided herein shall remain so vested for a period of three(3)years,unless extended by the Town Council in its complete discretion on a case-by-case basis. The Town Council shall consider both the needs of the Town and the property owner in determining to extend a vested property right beyond three(3)years. Any such extension shall be in the form of a development agreement duly authorized and executed by the landowner or landowners involved and approved by ordinance. The Town Council may impose reasonable conditions upon any such extension. (e) Applicability of Other Town Codes. The establishment of a vested property right shall not exempt the property owner from requirements for building permits,other necessary permits or other approvals required subsequent to the approval of a site specific development plan. The establishment of a vested property right shall not preclude the application of the requirements of the building code, fire code,plumbing code,electrical code,mechanical code or other requirements necessary for the protection of the public health,safety and welfare. (f) Judicial Review. Approval of a site specific development plan shall be subject to judicial review,and the period of time permitted by law for the filing of any such action shall begin to run from the date of site specific development plan approval. (g) Approvals Granted Prior to June 1, 1988. The provisions of this Section shall not apply to any site specific development plan or other land use approval granted prior to June 1, 1988. The applicable law on the date of such prior approval shall apply to such projects. (Ord.4-1998 §1) Division 2. Procedures for Review of Particular Applications Sec. 16A-5-200. Purpose. The purpose of Division 2 is to establish the procedures,submission contents and standards that apply to each type of development application within the Town. This Division addresses the following types of development applications:amendments to the text of the Land Use and Development Code, amendments to the Official Zone District Map,planned unit development (PUD), special review, variances, administrative modifications, subdivision exemptions, subdivision and temporary use permits. (Ord.4-1998 §1) Sec. 16A-5-210. Amendments to text of Development Code. ix 4� TC Ord.00-15 Page 17 (a) Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to provide the means by which the Town Council may,from time to time,amend,supplement or repeal the text of this Land Use and Development Code. (b) Initiation. An amendment to the text of this Development Code maybe initiated by resolution of the Town Council,by the Planning Commission,by the Planning Director,by any person who holds a recognized interest in land within the Town or by any citizen or business owner within the Town. (c) Procedure. The following procedures shall apply to an application for an amendment to the text of this Development Code. These procedures are illustrated in Figure 5-2, Text or Map Amendment Procedures. (1) Pre-application conference. Attendance at a pre-application conference is optional,but recommended, prior to submission of an application for an amendment to the text of this Development Code. (2) Submission of application. The applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Director that contains those materials specified in Section 16A-5-210(d),Submission Contents. (3) Staff review. Staff review of the application shall be accomplished, as specified in Section 16A-5-50, Staff Review of Application. (4) Planning Commission review. A complete copy of the application shall be forwarded to the Planning Commission,together with a copy of the staff review. The Planning Commission shall review the application,considering the standards of Section 16A-5-210(e),Review Standards, and shall make its recommendations to the Town Council. (5) Town Council first reading. The Planning Commission's recommendations shall be forwarded to the Town Council at a regular meeting, together with a complete copy of the application and a copy of the staffs review. The Town Council shall consider all relevant materials and shall adopt an ordinance on first reading amending the Development Code as recommended or with modifications, or shall adopt a resolution denying the application, citing specific reasons therefor. (6) Public hearing. Prior to second reading of such ordinance,the Town Council shall hold a public hearing. Public notice of the hearing shall be given by publication of notice,pursuant to Section 16A-5-60(b), Manner and Timing of Notice. The Town Council shall consider the application, any relevant support materials, the staff report, the Planning Commission's recommendation and the public testimony given at the public hearing. Following closure of the public hearing, the Town Council shall either adopt the ordinance, adopt the ordinance with modifications or deny the ordinance,considering the standards in Section 16A-5-210(e),Review Standards. If the Council shall make modifications to the ordinance prior to adoption it may,but need not,remand the application to the Planning Commission for further recommendations. (7) Interim amendment procedure. From the period following the adoption of this Land Use and Development Code until December 31, 2000, the Town Council may initiate amendments to the text of this Code without compliance with the provisions of Section 16A-5- 210(c)(1)through(c)(5),provided that the Town Council shall refer such amendments to the Planning Commission following first reading of the ordinance for comment. Comments of the AW sop TC Ord.00-15 Page 18 Planning Commission shall be delivered to the Town Council at the public hearing on the ordinance. (d) Submission Contents. An application for amendment to the text of this Development Code shall contain the following materials: (1) Minimum contents. The minimum contents for any application,as specified in Section 16A-5-40(b),Minimum Contents. (2) Precise wording. The precise wording of the proposed amendment. (e) Review Standards. An application for an amendment to the text of the Development Code shall comply with the following standards: (1) Consistent with purposes. The proposed amendment shall be consistent with the purposes of this Development Code. (2) Not conflict with other provisions. The proposed amendment shall not conflict with any other applicable provisions of this Development Code. (3) Consistent with Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment shall be consistent with the Town of Snowmass Village Comprehensive Plan. (4) Public health, safety and welfare. The proposed amendment shall preserve the public health,safety,general welfare and environment and contribute to the orderly development of the Town. ��r TIC Ord.00-15 Page 19 FIGURE 5-2 TEXT OR MAP AMENDMENT PROCEDURES PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE (OF IONALI J IT TION PUBLIC NOTICE ING SION NG UNCIL DING ANCE PUBLIC NOTICE TOWN COUNCIL SEOONO READING OF ORDINANCE (Ord.4-1998 §1; Ord. 1-1999 §1) Sec. 16A-5-220. Amendments to Official Zone District Map. (a) Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to provide the means by which the Town Council may,from time to time,amend,supplement or repeal the contents of the Official Zone District Map. No rezoning of a specific parcel of real property by a change in zoning classification resulting in a change to the Official Zone District Map shall be valid unless approved by the Town Council pursuant to the provisions set forth herein. (b) Initiation of Map Amendment. An amendment to the Official Zone District Map may be initiated by resolution of the Town Council,by the Planning Commission,by the Planning Director or by any person who holds a recognized interest in the land affected by the proposed amendment or their authorized agent. (c) Procedure. The following procedures shall apply to an application for an amendment to the Official Zone District Map. These procedures are illustrated in Figure 5-2,Text or Map Amendment Procedures. azzv� • TC Ord.00-15 Page 20 (1) Pre-application conference. Attendance at a pre-application conference is optional,but recommended,prior to submission of an application for an amendment to the Official Zone District Map. (2) Submission of application. The applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Director that contains the applicable materials specified in Section 16A-5-210(d), Submission Contents. (3) Staff review. Staff review of the application shall be accomplished, as specified in Section 16A-5-50, Staff Review of Application. (4) Planning Commission review. A complete copy of the application shall be forwarded to the Planning Commission,together with a copy of the staff review. The Planning Commission shall review the application,considering the standards of Section 16A-5-220(e),Review Standards, and shall make its recommendations to the Town Council. (5) Town Council first reading. The Planning Commission's recommendations shall be forwarded to the Town Council at a regular meeting, together with a complete copy of the application and a copy of the staffs review. The Town Council shall consider all relevant materials and shall adopt an ordinance on first reading amending the Official Zone District Map as recommended or with modifications,or shall adopt a resolution denying the application,citing specific reasons therefore. (6) Public hearing. Prior to second reading and final adoption of such ordinance,the Town Council shall hold a public hearing. Public notice of the hearing shall be given by publication, mailing and posting of notice,pursuant to Section 16A-5-60(b),Manner and Timing of Notice. The Town Council shall consider the application,any relevant support materials,the staff report, the Planning Commission's recommendation and the public testimony given at the public hearing. Following closure of the public hearing,the Town Council shall either adopt the ordinance,adopt the ordinance with modifications or deny the ordinance,considering the standards in Section 16A- 5-220(e),Review Standards. (d) Submission Contents. An application for an amendment to the Official Zone District Map shall contain the following materials: (1) Minimum contents. The minimum contents for any application,as specified in Section 16A-5-40(b),Minimum Contents. (2) Survey map. An accurate survey map of the property proposed for amendment,stating the area of the property proposed to be amended in square feet or acres. (3) Zone districts. A map showing the present zone district designation(s)of the property and the zoning of all adjacent properties,as depicted on the Official Zone District Map. (4) Existing uses. A description of the existing uses on the property and on all adjacent properties. (5) Petition. A petition in favor of the rezoning,signed by real property owners representing Vb TC Ord.00-15 Page 21 at least eighty percent(80%)of the land area included in the application,if property other than that owned by the applicant is included in the area of the proposed rezoning. (6) Private applications. For any private application for an amendment to the Official Zone District Map,the application shall contain a development proposal for the entire parcel,submitted in conformance with Article V,Division 3,Planned Unit Development,or any other applicable section of this Article V. a. Rezoning of a portion of a parcel. The Town Council may permit the rezoning of only a portion of a larger parcel when the Town Council has determined that said rezoning is consistent with the standards of Section 16A-5-220(e),Review Standards,and said action is necessary to promote the public health,safety and welfare. b. Conditional approval. The application for rezoning will be considered for conditional approval subject to subsequent approval of a development proposal for the area to be rezoned. (e) Review Standards. An application for an amendment to the Official Zone District Map shall comply with the following standards and,whenever applicable,shall also comply with the standards of Section 16A-5-220(f),Review Standards for Rezoning of Lands Zoned Open Space or Conservation. (1) Consistent with Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment shall be consistent with the Town of Snowmass Village Comprehensive Plan. (2) Consistent with purpose of zone district. The proposed amendment shall be consistent with the purpose of the zone district to which the property will be designated. (3) Compatibility with surrounding zone districts and uses. The development permitted by the proposed amendment shall be compatible with surrounding zone districts, land uses and neighborhood character and shall result in a logical and orderly development pattern within the overall community. (4) Necessary circumstances. The applicant shall demonstrate that the following circumstances exist: a. Error. There has been a technical error in the boundaries shown on the Official Zone District Map; or b. Changed conditions. There have been changed conditions affecting the subject parcel and the surrounding neighborhood that justify the proposed amendment; and c. Community need. The proposed amendment addresses and helps to resolve a community need that is documented in or is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. (f) Review Standards for Rezoning of Lands Zoned Open Space or Conservation. Certain lands have previously been zoned Open Space or Conservation within Snowmass Village by the Town,with the approval of the property owner at the time of the zoning. The preservation of these parcels in their open and natural character has been determined to be in the best interest of the public welfare. There are,however,certain circumstances where a change of zoning may be desirable in order to facilitate a %�3b r TC Ord.00-15 Page 22 development that is in the public interest. Any amendment to the Official Zone District Map that would change the zoning of any land designated Open Space or Conservation to any other zone district category established in Article III,Zone Districts,of this Development Code shall only be permitted when the application complies with the following standards: (1) Areas of five(5)acres or less. An area of up to but not exceeding five(5)acres that is zoned Open Space or Conservation may be rezoned to another zone district established in Article III,Zone Districts,provided that such amendment to the Official Zone District Map is necessary to facilitate a development proposal that is determined to be in the public interest and the application is approved by a two-thirds(z/3)vote of the entire Town Council. (2) Areas in excess of five(5)acres. An area exceeding five(5) acres that is zoned Open Space or Conservation may be rezoned to another zone district established in Article III,Zone Districts, in order to facilitate a development proposal only when the developer shall rezone a suitable amount of land that is zoned other than Open Space or Conservation to Open Space. The suitability of the amount and location of land to be rezoned to Open Space by the developer shall be at the discretion of the Town Council. The objective shall be to ensure that there is not a diminishment of quality open space within the Town. The Town Council shall,prior to approving the application,find that the proposed amendment to the Official Zone District Map is in the public interest. Approval of the application shall require a two-thirds(2/3)vote of the entire Town Council. (3) Election required. In an instance where the parcel to be rezoned from Open Space or Conservation to another category identified in Article III,Zone Districts,does not comply with the standards of Subsections(f)(1)or(2)above,said amendment to the Official Zone District Map shall only be permitted by the Town Council after such application is approved by a majority of the electors voting on the proposal in a special municipal election. (Ord. 4-1998 §1) See. 16A-5-230. Special review. (a) Purpose. There are certain uses which, because of their unusual character and potential impact upon the use and enjoyment of neighboring property, cannot be classified into a particular district or districts without site specific consideration of their impacts upon neighboring lands and upon the public need for the particular use at the particular location. These uses require special review of their location,design,intensity,density,configuration,operating characteristics and impacts on public facilities,and may require the imposition of appropriate conditions to ensure the use will be compatible at a particular location and mitigates its adverse impacts. (b) Permit Required. Only those uses designated as a special review use in the underlying zone district in Article III,Zone Districts,may be approved by special review,after issuance of permit in accordance with the procedures set forth herein. No approved special review use may be modified, structurally enlarged or expanded in ground area unless such modification,enlargement or expansion receives the prior approval of the Town. (c) Procedure. The following procedures shall apply to an application for a special review permit. These procedures are illustrated in Figure 5-6, Special Review Application Procedures. (1) Pre-application conference. Attendance at a pre-application conference is required prior to submission of an application for a special review permit. At this meeting or within ten(10)days �31 an TC Ord.00-15 Page 23 afterward,the Planning Director shall decide if the application can be processed administratively by staff or if it must be forwarded to the Planning Commission and Town Council as the decision- maker. (2) Submission of application. The applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Director that contains those materials specified in Subsection(d),Application Contents. (3) Administrative Staff Review. Staff review of the application shall be accomplished,as specified in Section 16A-5-50, Staff Review of Application. For applications being processed administratively,a public notice that the staff is considering an application for a special review use shall be given by publication, mailing and posting of notice, pursuant to Section 16A-5-60(b), Manner and Timing of Notice. Notice of the public hearing shall also be provided to the Planning Commission. a. Public hearing. A complete copy of the application shall be forwarded to the Planning Director,together with a copy of the staff review. The Planning Director shall hold a public hearing to consider the application. The public hearing shall be conducted pursuant to Section 16A-5-70(b),Conduct of Public Hearing. b.Action by Planning Director. Within three(3)days after the closure of the public hearing, the Planning Director shall approve, approve with conditions or deny the application, considering the relevant materials and testimony and the standards in Subsection(e),Review Standards.If,during the staff review or during the public hearing, any issues arise that cannot be resolved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director or the applicant,then the staff shall refer the application within thirty(30)days to the Planning Commission,which shall approve,approve with conditions or deny the application,based on the standards in Subsection(e),Review Standards. Public notice that an application for a special review use has been referred to the Planning Commission shall be given by publication,mailing and posting of notice,pursuant to Section 16A-5-60(b),Manner and Timing of Notice. c. Appeal. A decision by the Planning Director or the Planning Commission on a special review application may be appealed,pursuant to Section 16A-5-80,Appeals. The appeal shall be referred to the Town Council,which shall consider the matter pursuant to Section 16A-5-80(d),Procedure. (4) Action by decision-making body. The following procedure shall apply to an application for special review if,due to it's scale or potential impacts upon surrounding properties due to the nature and intensity of the proposed activity or use,it is determined by the Planning Director to warrant referral to the Planning Commission and Town Council for final determination. a. Staff review. Staff review of the application shall be accomplished,as specified in Section 16A-5-50, Staff Review of Application. b. Planning Commission review. A complete copy of the application shall be forwarded to the Planning Commission,together with a copy of the staff review. The Planning Commission shall review the application,considering the relevant materials and TC Ord.00-15 Page 24 testimony and the standards in Subsection (e), Review Standards, and shall make its recommendations to the Town Council. (5) Action by Town Council. A complete copy of the application shall be forwarded to the Town Council,together with a copy of the staff review. Public notice that the Town Council will consider the application shall be given by publication,posting and mailing of notice, pursuant to Section 16A-5-60(b), Manner and Timing of Notice. The Town Council shall hold a public hearing to consider the application,which shall be conducted pursuant to Section 16A-5-70(b),Conduct of Public Hearing. The Town Council shall consider all relevant materials and testimony,shall consider the standards of Subsection (e), Review Standards, and shall approve, approve with conditions or deny the application. FIGURE 5.6 SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION PROCEDURES PRE-APPLICAnON CONFERENCE (OPTIONAL) SUBMIT APPLICATION STAFF PUBLIC REVIEW NOTICE I PLANNING DIRECTOR PUBLIC HEARING ACTI ON BV REFER APPLICATION PUNNING TO DIRECTOR F PIAN.COMMISSION I OR PUBLIC NOTICE AND HEARING BV PLAN.COMMISSION PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION (NEW DIAGRAM TO BE PROVIDED AT THE MEETING) (d) Application Contents. A special review application shall contain the following: M:� 606 TC Ord.00-15 Page 25 (1) Minimum contents. The minimum contents for any application,as specified in Section 16A-5-40(b),Minimum Contents. (2) Improvements survey. An improvements survey,showing the location and dimensions of all existing structures, streets, alleys, easements, drainage areas, irrigation ditches, public and private utilities and other significant features within the property. (3) Site plan. A site plan,showing proposed features that are relevant to the special review application. (4) Other information. The Planning Director may request the applicant to submit such other information as is necessary to evaluate the impacts of the special review application. Examples of the information that may be requested are elevations of proposed new or remodeled structures, analysis of the traffic impacts of the proposed use or evaluation of the environmental impacts of the proposed use. (e) Review Standards. An application for a special review use shall comply with the following standards: (1) Consistent with Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use shall be consistent with the intent of the Town of Snowmass Village Comprehensive Plan. (2) Comply with standards of Development Code. The proposed use shall comply with all other applicable standards of this Development Code, including,but not limited to: a. Zone district standards. The purpose of the zone district in which it is located, the dimensional limitations of that zone district and any standards applicable to the particular use, all as specified in Article III, Zone Districts. b. Development evaluation standards. The applicable standards specified in Article IV, Development Evaluation Standards. (3) Compatible. The proposed use shall be appropriate to its proposed location and be compatible with the character of surrounding land uses in the area,and shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. (4) Adequacy of access. Access to the site shall be adequate for the proposed use,considering the width of adjacent streets,their grades,intersection safety,visibility and entrance into the area to be developed. When appropriate,public transportation,or other public or private transportation services,and appropriate pedestrian facilities, shall be made available to serve the use. (5) Design minimizes adverse impact. The design and operation of the proposed use shall minimize adverse impacts and shall not create a nuisance, considering such impacts as traffic congestion or traffic hazards,service delivery,parking and loading,trash removal,odors,noise, glare and vibration. (G) Design minimizes environmental impact. The proposed use shall minimize environmental impacts and shall not cause significant deterioration of water and air resources,wildlife habitat, -.3Y am TC Ord.00-15 Page 26 scenic resources and other natural resources. (7) Facilities. There shall be adequate public facilities available to serve the proposed use,or the applicant shall propose necessary improvements to address service deficiencies that the use would cause. In particular,the applicant shall demonstrate that adequate water supply and sewage disposal service is available for the proposed use,including sufficient water pressure and proximity to fire hydrants to provide for fire protection needs. (8) Parking. Sufficient off-street parking shall be provided for the proposed use. (f) Conditions Authorized. The Planning Director,Planning Commission or the Town Council may,in approving the special review permit,impose such restrictions and conditions on such approval, the proposed use,and the premises to be developed or used pursuant to such approval,as it determines are required by the Comprehensive Plan and this Development Code to prevent or minimize adverse effects from the proposed use and development on surrounding land uses and on the general health, safety and welfare of the Town. The Town shall be authorized to set limits on the length of any special review permit that it issues and to obtain assurances that the ongoing operation of the use will comply with all of the applicant's representations and all conditions of approval,such as by requiring an annual compliance review. All conditions imposed in any special review approval, with the exception of conditions made applicable to such approval by the express terms of this Development Code,shall be set forth in the special review permit. (g) Expiration. A special review permit shall be valid for three(3)years from the date of its issuance. If,within three(3)years,the applicant shall not have obtained a building permit to develop the special review use,or shall not have placed the special review use into operation,if the use does not require a building permit,then the permit shall expire. (1) Extension. An applicant may request an extension of these expiration provisions. The request shall be submitted to the Planning Director and must be submitted prior to the date on which the permit is to expire. Submission of a request for an extension shall stay the expiration of the permit until such time as the extension request is approved or denied by the Town Council. (2) Town Council authority. Authority to grant an extension of up to one(1)year shall be at the sole discretion of the Town Council,which shall consider whether it has been demonstrated that: (a)the applicant has diligently pursued the permit;(b)failure to proceed with the permit was beyond the applicant's control; and (c) there is a reasonable likelihood that the permit will be developed within the next year. (Ord.4-1998 §1) Sec. 16A-5-240. Variances. (a) Purpose. This Section sets forth the procedures and standards for obtaining a variance from the standards of the Land Use and Development Code. A variance is a deviation from the standards of the Development Code that is necessitated by special circumstances or conditions of the physical site (such as exceptional topography, or the narrowness, shallowness or shape of a particular piece of property),that would create practical difficulties for,or an unusual hardship upon,the owners of the land if the provisions of this Code were to be strictly enforced. (b) Procedure. The following procedures shall apply to an application for a variance. These 4.� OM TC Ord.00-15 Page 27 procedures are illustrated in Figure 5-7,Variance Application Procedures. (1) Pre-application conference. Attendance at apre-application conference is optional prior to submission of an application for a variance. (2) Submission of application. The applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Director that contains the following materials: a. Minimum contents. The minimum contents for any application,as specified in Section 16A-5-40(b),Minimum Contents. b. Site plan. A site plan of the subject property, showing existing improvements and proposed development features that are relevant to the review of the proposed variance application. c. Other information. The applicant shall submit such other written or graphic information as is necessary to describe and evaluate the proposed variance, such as proposed building elevations. (3) Staffreview. Staff review of the application shall be accomplished,as specified in Section 16A-5-50, Staff Review of Application. (4) Action by Planning Commission. A complete copy of the application shall be forwarded to the Planning Commission, together with a copy of the staff review. Public notice that the Planning Commission will consider the application shall be given by publication, posting and mailing of notice,pursuant to Section 16A-5-60(b),Manner and Timing of Notice. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing to consider the application, which shall be conducted pursuant to Section 16A-5-70(b), Conduct of Public Hearing. The Planning Commission shall consider all relevant materials and testimony,shall consider the standards of Subsection(c),Review Standards, and shall approve, approve with conditions or deny the application. (5) Appeal. A decision by the Planning Commission on a variance application may be appealed, pursuant to Section 16A-5-80, Appeals. The appeal shall be referred to the Town Council,which shall consider the matter pursuant to Section 16A-5-80(d),Procedure. r�� TC Ord.00-15 Page 28 FIGURE 5-7 VARIANCE APPLICATION PROCEDURES PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE (OPTIONAL) SUBMR APPLICATION STAFF PUBLIC I� REVIEW NOTICE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION (c) Review Standards. An application for a variance shall comply with all of the following standards: (1) Special circumstances exist. There are special circumstances or conditions, such as exceptional topography,or the narrowness,shallowness or shape of the property,that are peculiar to the land or building for which the variance is sought,and do not apply generally to land or buildings in the neighborhood; (2) Not result of applicant. The special circumstances and conditions have not resulted from any act of the applicant; (3) Strict application causes practical difficulties. The special circumstances and conditions are such that the strict application of the provisions of this Development Code would result in practical difficulties to and undue hardship upon the use of the land or building; (4) Necessary to relieve practical difficulties. The granting of the variance is necessary to relieve the applicant of the practical difficulties and undue hardship in the use of the land or building and is the minimum variance that could be granted to achieve said relief, (5) Not adversely affect neighborhood. The granting of the variance will not change the character or otherwise adversely affect the neighborhood surrounding the land where the variance is proposed,will not have a substantially adverse impact on the enjoyment of land abutting upon or across the street from the property in question,will not impair an adequate supply of light or air to ..37 _ TC Ord.00-15 Page 29 adjacent property,will not increase the danger of fire or otherwise endanger public safety or the public interest and will not substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood; (6) Harmony with Development Code. The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the purposes and intent of this Development Code, including the intent of the underlying zone district. No variance shall be approved that permits the construction or enlargement of any building or decks and related structures for any use prohibited in the underlying zone district; and (7) Consistent with Comprehensive Plan. The granting of the variance will be consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. (Ord.4-1998 §1) Sec. 16A-5-250. Administrative modifications. (a) Purpose. This Section sets forth the procedures and standards for obtaining an administrative modification. An administrative modification is a staff-level review procedure that allows minor changes to be made to certain dimensional limitations or other design features in order to address technical constraints or unanticipated circumstances that arise prior to or during final design and actual construction. An administrative modification shall only be granted for the following types of activities: (1) Setback. The intrusion of a building or an above-grade structure into a required setback by one(1) foot or less for new construction. (2) Floor area. An increase in the maximum allowable floor area of a structure by no more than two percent(2%)or fifty(50) square feet,whichever is less. (3) Building height. An increase in a building's height by one(1) foot or less. (4) Parking space size. A decrease in the size of a required parking space by one(1)foot or less. (5) Crawl space or attic space. A crawl space or attic space that is greater than five and one- half(5'/:)feet at any point when rational construction methods will not allow compliance with the maximum height of five and one-half(5%:)feet,provided that the Planning Director may impose reasonable conditions to limit or restrict the use of said space. (6) On-grade or below-grade structures. The projection of an on-grade or below-grade structure into a required setback in a manner that exceeds the limitations established in Section 16A-3-200(b)(2), Structures On or Below Finished Grade. The Planning Director may impose reasonable conditions to ensure that such structures will not hinder road maintenance and snow plowing operations and will have minimal visual impacts,and to ensure that the owner indemnifies the Town against any damage that may occur to said structures. (7) Building outside of established envelope. An intrusion into a required setback,where a building or portion thereof was previously constructed outside of the established building envelope for the lot. (8) Adjustment to building envelope. Adjustment of a building envelope to correct an s l TC Ord.00-15 Page 30 existing condition or to allow it to better conform to the standards of this Development Code,such as by allowing less vegetation to be removed from the site,helping to lessen impacts from drainage or site grading or permitting better access to the site to be provided. (9) Administrative amendments. An administrative amendment to any other design feature of an approved PUD, subdivision or building lot, or an administrative amendment to the uses approved for a PUD. Activities that shall not be considered administrative include changes to the overall character of the project, changes that substantially increase trip generation or the demand for public facilities and changes that are inconsistent with a condition or a representation of the project's original approval,or that require granting a further variation from that granted in the original approval. (10) Interim SPA(SPA-1 and SPA-2)authorization. Improvements to existing development within Specially Planned Area(SPA-1 and SPA-2)and Governmental Specially Planned Area zone districts that have not been reviewed pursuant to the procedures and standards of Article V, Division 3, Planned Unit Development, provided: a)the improvements are necessary for the maintenance and repair or remodeling of an existing building;b)there will be no change in type of use except as may be accessory to or customary in connection with the existing principal use(s) of the building; c) the total square footage of the floor space of the building is not increased by more than ten percent(10%)or five hundred(500)square feet,whichever is less, except in the case of Governmental Specially Planned Areas it shall be ten percent(10%)of the building floor space;d)the proposed improvements will be consistent with Section 16A-4-340, Building Design Guidelines to Preserve Community Character;and e)all future development improvements within the property shall be reviewed pursuant to the procedures and standards of Article V, Division 3, Planned Unit Development. The Planning Director shall require the preparation of an interim site development and land use plan and may impose reasonable conditions to ensure that such structures will not change the basic character of existing building or surrounding areas or have a substantially adverse impact upon surrounding properties. (11) Site disturbance outside building envelope. Earth berms located outside the building envelope which do not satisfy the criteria specified within Section 16A-4-320(b)(2)a, Earth Berm Outside Building Envelope. The Planning Director may impose reasonable conditions to ensure that such berm will be located and designed to reasonably fit the site and to minimize the visual impact upon surrounding property owners. (b) Procedure. The following procedures shall apply to an application for an administrative modification. These procedures are illustrated in Figure 5-8,Administrative Modification Application Procedures. (1) Pre-application conference. Attendance at a pre-application conference is optional prior to submission of an administrative modification application. (2) Submission of application. The applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Director that contains the following materials: a. Minimum contents. The minimum contents for any application,as specified in Section 16A-5-40(b),Minimum Contents. TC Ord.00-15 Page 31 b. Site plan. A site plan of the subject property, showing existing improvements and proposed development features that are relevant to the review of the proposed administrative modification. As necessary, the applicant shall also submit such other written or graphic information as is necessary to describe the proposed modification, such as a sketch of those elements of the proposed structure for which an administrative modification is requested. c. Improvement survey. An improvement survey,showing the location and dimensions of all existing structures,streets,alleys,easements,drainage areas,irrigation ditches,public and private utilities and other significant features within the property or proximate to the project area shall be required as may be determined necessary by the Planning Director to ensure adequate review of the application. d. Other information. The Planning Director may request the applicant to submit such other information as is necessary to evaluate the impacts of the administrative modification application. Examples of the information that may be requested are elevations of proposed new or remodeled structures,analysis of the traffic impacts of the proposed use or evaluation of the environmental or fiscal impacts of the proposed use. e. List of adjacent owners. Applicants proposing to adjust a building envelope,extend an on-grade or below-grade structure into a required setback,obtain interim SPA(SPA-1 and SPA-2)authorization or to amend a use in an approved PUD shall submit a list of all owners of property that is located within three hundred(300)feet of the subject property. The list of persons shall be compiled pursuant to Section 16A-5-60(b)(2)a, Source of List. (3) Staff review and notice. Staff review of the application shall be accomplished as specified in Section 16A-5-50, Staff Review of Application. For an application proposing to adjust a building envelope,extend an on-grade or below-grade structure into a required setback, obtain interim SPA(SPA-1 and SPA-2)authorization or to amend a use in an approved PUD, the applicant shall provide notice by certified mail to all owners of property that is located within three hundred(300)feet of the subject property. The notice that is mailed shall contain sufficient graphic and written material to fully describe the administrative modification proposal and state that the Planning Director will take action on the application within fifteen(15)days after the date of the mailing. (4) Action by Planning Director. Following the notice period,the Planning Director shall either refer the application to the Planning Commission for final determination or issue a written decision notice approving, approving with conditions or denying the application, based on the following standards: a. Unforeseen circumstances. The proposed modification shall be the result of circumstances that could not have been reasonably anticipated by the applicant prior to or during the original approval process; and b. Insubstantial impacts. Any adverse impacts on surrounding properties from the proposed modification shall be insubstantial. (5)' Referral to Planning Commission. If,during the staff review or during the public hearing, any issues arise that cannot be resolved to the satisfaction of the staff or the applicant,then the staff 10 610 TIC Ord.00-15 Page 32 shall refer the application to the Planning Commission, which shall approve, approve with conditions or deny the application,based on the standards in Section 16A-5-250(4)above. Public notice that an application for administrative modification has been referred to the Planning Commission shall be given by publication,mailing and posting of notice,pursuant to Section 16A- 5-60(b),Manner and Timing of Notice. (6) Appeal. A decision by the Planning Director on an administrative modification maybe appealed, pursuant to Section 16A-5-80, Appeals. The appeal shall be referred to the Town Council,which shall consider the matter pursuant to Section 16A-5-80(d),Procedure. (7) Recording of decision. If the Planning Director or Planning Commission approves the administrative modification,the applicant shall,within thirty(30)days of the date of said approval, cause the written decision notice to be recorded in the records of the County Clerk and Recorder. (8) Recording of interim site development and land use plan. Within ninety(90)days of the date of approval of the administrative modification, the applicant shall, if required by their approval,submit two(2)Mylar copies,suitable for recording,of the interim site development and land use plan to the Planning Director,together with any other documents that are to be recorded. The Planning Director shall review the documents to ensure they comply with the terms and conditions of approval,shall obtain signatures for all of the applicable certificates on the interim plan and shall return the documents to the applicant. The applicant shall thereafter cause the documents to be recorded in the records of the County Clerk and Recorder, at the applicant's expense. FIGURE 5-8 ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION APPLICATION PROCEDURES PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE (OPTIONAL) SUBMIT APPLICATION STAFF REVIEW F NING DIRECTOR ACTION RFFERRALTO PLANNING DIRECTOR PLANNING COMMISSION OR DECISION -Yl00 TC Ord.00-15 Page 33 (Ord.4-1998 §1; Ord. 1-1999 §1; Ord. 10-1999 §1) Sec. 16A-5-260. Temporary uses. (a) Purpose and Authority. This Section is intended to provide a mechanism for the Town to consider activities of a temporary or short-term nature that provide or facilitate an overall benefit to the community or further an official policy or objective of the Town, such as temporary activities of a civic,educational or cultural nature or entertainment-oriented activities. (1) Administrative temporary use permit. An administrative temporary use permit may be issued to any short-term use not allowed as a use by right,or as an accessory use or special review use in the particular zone district where the use is proposed,provided that the individual activity or event shall last for a period of time not to exceed ten(10)days. (2) Annual temporary use permit. An annual temporary use permit may be issued to any short-term use not allowed as a use by right,or as an accessory use or special review use in the particular zone district where the use is proposed,or that involves the construction of any structure, provided that the individual activity or event lasts for a period of time in excess of ten(10)days,but not to exceed one(1)year. (b) Review Procedure. The following procedures shall apply to an application for an annual or an administrative temporary use permit. These procedures are illustrated in Figure 5-11,Temporary Use Application Procedures. (1) Pre-application conference. Attendance at a pre-application conference is optional prior to submission of an application for an annual or an administrative temporary use permit. The topics of discussion at the pre-application conference shall include,but not be limited to: a. Use and timing. The nature of the use in question and the time frame for which the temporary use permit is proposed to be in effect. b. Site characteristics. Physical characteristics of the site and surrounding area that will influence the determination of the suitability of the site for the proposed temporary use. c. Applicable provisions. The provisions of this Section that apply to the proposal, including the applicable review procedures,submission requirements and review standards. d. Emergency plans. Provisions and plans for dealing with potential emergency situations. , e. Water and sanitation. Necessity for and availability of drinking water and sanitary facilities. f. Food and beverage service. If food and beverage service is to be provided, a plan to provide such services and evidence of other necessary approvals or licenses. g. Parking and transportation. A parking and transportation plan and the necessity for police assistance. d% sow TC Ord.00-15 Page 34 h. Admissions schedule. A rate, fee or admissions schedule for all or a portion of the activity, if applicable. i. Unique concerns. Any other concerns unique to the particular activity. (2) Submission of application. The applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Director that contains those materials specified in Subsection(c),Application Contents. (3) Staff review. Staffreview of the application shall be accomplished,as specified in Section 16A-5-50, Staff Review of Application. (4) Action by decision-making body. A complete copy of the application shall be forwarded to the decision-making body,together with a copy of the staff review. a. Administrative temporary use. If the application is for an administrative temporary use permit,or is for the renewal of a previously issued annual temporary use permit that will remain substantially as previously approved,then the Planning Director shall issue a written decision notice approving,approving with conditions or denying the application,based on the standards in Subsection(d),Review Standards. Prior to issuance of any administrative temporary use permit,the Planning Director shall forward a complete copy of the application to the Town Council,to notify the Council members of the pending action. b. Annual temporary use permit. If the application is for an annual temporary use permit, then the Planning Commission shall review the application, considering the standards of Subsection(d),Review Standards,and shall make its recommendations to the Town Council. Public notice that the Town Council will consider the application shall be given by publication and posting of notice,pursuant to Section 16A-5-60(b),Manner and Timing of Notice. The Town Council shall hold a public hearing to consider the application. The public hearing shall be conducted pursuant to Section 16A-5-70(b),Conduct of Public Hearing. The Town Council shall consider all relevant materials and testimony,shall consider the standards in Subsection (d),Review Standards,and shall,by resolution,approve,approve with conditions or deny the application. (5) Actions subsequent to approval. a. Appeal of administrative temporary use permit. A decision by the Planning Director concerning an application for an administrative temporary use permit may be appealed,pursuant to the provisions of Section 16A-5-80,Appeals. The appeal shall be referred to Town Council, which shall consider the matter pursuant to Section 16A-5-80(d),Procedure. b. Changes or modifications. Any proposed changes or modifications to an approved temporary use permit may be approved by the Planning Director,provided such changes or modifications are insubstantial in nature and are generally consistent with the original approval. All other proposed changes shall require repetition of the procedures for obtaining the temporary use permit. c. Expiration. An administrative temporary use permit shall expire at the conclusion of the event or activity for which it was granted,and shall not be extended or continued. 13 so TIC Ord.00-15 Page 35 FIGURE 541 TEMPORARY USE APPLICATION PROCEDURES 7M-APPLICATION CONFERENCE (MANDATORY) SUBMIT APPLICATION STAFFREVIEW ADMIN.TEMP.USE ANNUAL TEMP.USE ACTION BY PLANNING PIANN[NO COMMISSION DIRECTOR MEETING OR EPUrBUC OTICE UNCIL A RING TOWN COUNCIL ACTION (c) Application Contents. An application for an annual or an administrative temporary use permit shall contain the following materials. (1) Minimum contents. The minimum contents for any application,as specified in Section 16A-5-40(b),Minimum Contents. (2) Site drawing. A drawing illustrating the characteristics of the site and surrounding area that are pertinent to the application, including its location, significant natural and man-made features,with particular attention to natural hazards,resources or other special areas of concern,the size and accessibility of the site and surrounding development and land use. (3) Notice of traffic disruption. Should the event involve major disruptions in normal traffic flow,the applicant shall provide evidence as to how the event will be brought to the attention of the general public, specifically outlining the areas where any rerouting will occur. (4) Liquor license. Evidence that a liquor license or any other necessary Town application has been submitted to the Town Clerk,whenever applicable. (5) Approval by landowner. If the applicant is not the landowner,then the applicant shall present evidence to show approval of the landowner for the particular use. TC Ord.00-15 page 36 (d) Review Standards. An application for an annual or an administrative temporary use permit shall comply with the following standards. (1) Use shall be appropriate. The proposed temporary use shall be appropriate in the particular location,taking into consideration the nature of the use,its relationship to surrounding land uses and its impact with respect to environmental,social and economic matters. (2) Use shall comply with policies and regulations. The proposed temporary use shall comply with the Town's adopted policies and regulations,and shall not violate any applicable state,county or federal laws. (3) Applicant's skills and experience. The applicant shall demonstrate that he or she possesses the requisite skill and experience to ensure that the particular activity will be conducted in a safe and orderly manner. (4) Written approval. The applicant shall obtain written approval from all reviewing agencies having jurisdiction over the proposed temporary use. (e) Conditions Authorized. In granting a temporary use,the Planning Director or Town Council may impose reasonable conditions upon the permit,but shall in any event require the applicant to abide by at least the following conditions: (1) Disruptions in traffic. Should the event involve major disruptions in normal traffic flow, the applicant shall bring notice of the event to the attention of the general public. Said notice shall specifically outline the areas where any rerouting will occur. (2) Liquor license. Should the event involve obtaining a liquor license,the applicant shall comply with all applicable Town liquor license requirements. (3) Other considerations. Such other considerations as may be necessary including,but not Iii ited to,provision for a damage or clean-up deposit,additional fees,hours of operation,sanitation requirements, traffic control,parking,transportation and provisions for utility service. (f) Penalties. Violation of any term or condition of an annual or an administrative temporary use permit by the permittee,its agents or employees shall subject the permittee to the penalties set forth in Section 1-72 of the Municipal Code. hi addition,where probable cause exists to suspect that a violation of any term or condition of a temporary use permit will pose a threat to public health, safety or welfare, the Chief of Police is hereby authorized to revoke a temporary use permit and to require that any activity authorized thereby cease and desist immediately. (Ord.4-1998 §1) Section 16A-5-270 Zoning Plan Review (a) Purpose. The purpose of zones plan review is to allow detailed administrative review of development proposals that would not otherwise require submission of a development application, in order to ensure compliance of the proposal with the provisions of this Land Use and Development Code. TC Ord.00-15 Page 37 (b) Applicability. Zonipg plan review shall be required for the following types of activities: 1. Construction. All construction, reconstruction, exterior renovation, conversion, expansion, enlargement, structural alteration,relocation, change in use, or change in intensity of use of any,multi-family,hotel, or commercial or other non-residential dwelling, structure or property. The construction,reconstruction or addition of site or structural retaining walls within single-family residential property shall also require zoning plan review. 2. Grading. All grading,berming, filling, clearing,excavating, site preparation, or significant vegetation removal or landscaping for any property used or to be used for any single-family,multi-family, hotel, or commercial or other non- residential dwelling, structure or property. 3. PUD. Any development proposed to a property designated Planned Unit Development(PUD)on the Official Zone District Map or any development proposed to property within a previously approved PUD that would not otherwise require submission of a PUD or PUD amendment application. Zonjng plan review shall not be required for any single-family dwelling or duplex dwelling within a previously approved PUD except as may be required by Subparagraphs 1 and 2 above. (c) Procedure. The following procedures shall apply to an application for zoning plan review. The procedures are the same as the steps illustrated in Figure 5-8 for Administrative Modification Application Procedures. 1. If Building Permit Required. Zoning plan review for development involving construction, grading or landscaping submitted to be reviewed pursuant to Chapter 18, Building Regulations, of the Snowmass Village Municipal Code shall be reviewed as part of the building permit process. The building permit plans shall be sufficiently detailed to show the extent of the development proposed and shall contain the information specified in Section 16A-5-270(d), to the extent that the information is applicable to the proposed development. Zoning plan approval may be granted if it is determined: a. The development proposed within the building permit plans comply with all applicable standards of the Land Use and Development Code, including but not limited to, the Development Evaluation Standards; and b. Any applicable terms and conditions imposed by the Town on any prior approval granted to the property have been satisfied. 2. If Building Permit Not Required.The following procedures shall apply to an TC Ord.00-15 Page 38 application for zoning plan review of any development not reviewed pursuant to Chapter 18,Building Regulations, of the Snowmass Village Municipal Code: a. Pre-Application Conference. Attendance at a pre-application conference is optional prior to submission of an application for site plan review. Applicants are encouraged to attend the pre-application conference to discuss whether any other application procedures apply to the proposed development and to determine which of the submission contents for site plan review will apply to the application. b. Submission of Application. The applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Director that contains the following applicable materials: 1) Minimum Contents. The minimum contents for any application, as specified in Section 16A-5-40(b), Minimum Contents. 2) Site Plan. A site plan of the subject property. The site plan shall be sufficiently detailed to show the extent of the development proposed. The site plan shall contain the information specified in Section 16A-5-270(d), as that information is applicable to the proposed development. 3) Other Reports and Plans. Any other reports or plans that the Planning Director determines are necessary to demonstrate the proposal's conformance with the Town's Development Evaluation Standards contained in Article IV of the Land Use and Development Code. c. Staff Review. Staff review of the application shall be accomplished,as specified in Section 16A-5-50, Staff Review of Application. d. Action By Planning Director. Following staff review of the application,the Planning Director shall determine whether the application complies with the standards of this section. Based on this determination, the Planning Director shall issue a written decision notice approving the application, approving the application with conditions, or denying the application. Provided,however, that the Planning Director may determine that the scope and nature of the development proposed in the zoning plan may create impacts that would be of significance to the community,or may determine that issues have arisen that cannot be resolved between staff and the applicant,and may refer the application to the Planning Commission, or to the Planning Commission for recommendation to the Town Council. The standards for zoning plan review by the Planning Director, Planning Commission, or Town Council are as follows: _ 4� OW TC Ord.00-15 Page 39 a) Compliance With Code. The zoning plan shall comply with all applicable standards of the Land Use and Development Code, including but not limited to,the Development Evaluation Standards; and b) Compliance With Prior Conditions. The zoning plan shall comply with any applicable terms and conditions imposed by the Town on any prior approval granted to the property. e. Appeal. A decision by the Planning Director or Planning Commission on a zoning plan may be appealed,pursuant to Section 16A-5-80, Appeals. The appeal shall be referred to the Town Council, which shall consider the matter pursuant to Section 16A-5-80(d),Procedure. f. Recording. When required as a condition of zoning plan approval, the applicant shall submit two(2)mylar copies of the zoning plan, together with any other documents that are to be recorded. The required documents shall be submitted within ninety(90) days of the date of the site plan's approval. The Planning Director shall review the documents to ensure they comply with the terms and conditions of the approval, shall obtain signatures for all of the applicable certificates on the zoning plan,and shall return the documents to the applicant. The applicant shall promptly cause the documents to be recorded in the records of the County Clerk and Recorder, at the applicant's expense. g. Amendments. An amendment to an approved zoning plan shall be reviewed by the Planning Director, who may approve the application, approve it with conditions, or deny it, based on whether the proposed amendment complies with the standards for site plan review, above. (d) Submission Contents for Zoning Plan. The zoning plan shall contain the materials listed below. The information may be provided on a single sheet or a set of sheets, as appropriate. The Planning Director is authorized to waive any of these requirements if the material would not be applicable to the proposed development. The Planning Director is also authorized to allow an applicant who wishes to obtain zoning plan approval for a particular phase of development to seek approval for just that phase. For example,an applicant who proposes to grade a site or to install utilities might only be required to submit the applicable grading or utilities plan. 1. Site Information. a. Boundaries. Perimeter boundary of the subject site and lot lines, if the application is for multiple lots. b. Natural Features. Natural site features, including water courses,one hundred(100)year floodplain, wetlands,riparian areas, sensitive 61� v 00 TC Ord.00-15 Page 40 wildlife habitat areas, geologic hazard areas, and ridgeline protection areas. Topography shall be depicted at two (2) foot contour intervals. C. Easements and Building Envelopes. All easements affecting the property, and any building envelopes that may have previously been designated for the property. 2. Proposed Development. a. Footprints and Setbacks. Proposed footprints of all principal and accessory structures. The setbacks from structures to property lines shall be dimensioned. Any required setbacks to floodplain,riparian, wetland,or ridgeline areas shall also be dimensioned. b. Streets, Parking Areas, and Utilities. Location and width of any existing or proposed streets,driveways,points of access,sidewalks,and trails. Existing and proposed parking areas shall be shown, including the location and dimensions of all parking spaces and driving aisles. The location of existing and proposed water lines, fire hydrants, sewer lines, drainage facilities,and other utilities shall also be shown. C. Public Spaces. Locations of any public spaces,plazas,outdoor seating areas, trash enclosures,recycling facilities, and loading docks. d. Landscape Plan. A landscape plan depicting the type, amount, size, species and location of all plant materials, with a planting schedule. Plans for irrigating landscaped areas shall be provided, if applicable. The plan shall show the location of all existing trees with a trunk circumference of fourteen(14) inches or more measured four and one- half(4 1/2) feet above the ground and shall indicate which trees are proposed to be removed. Where large groves of trees are to remain undisturbed, single trees need not be located. The landscape plan shall also show the location of proposed light fixtures and the location and dimensions of all snow storage areas. C. Building Elevations. Building elevations at a vertical scale of not less than one-eighth inch equals one foot (1/8" = 1') or larger of all significant facades of the proposed buildings. Building elevations shall be of sufficient detail to indicate building openings,materials proposed for the roof and exterior of the buildings, decks and other architectural features of the building, including chimneys and mechanical areas and features affecting the roof lines of all proposed buildings. f. Grading Plan. Existing and proposed grades at a contour interval of two(2) feet or less,based on field survey controls, including location with proposed grades and elevations for all buildings,roads,walks, storm sewers and other drainage structures and devices,retaining walls to op gI TC Ord.00-15 Page 41 and other landscape features. The plan shall provide designs for sediment control devices to be employed, including specifications of how graded areas will be stabilized and revegetated after construction is completed. Division 3. Planned Unit Development Sec. 16A-5-300. Purpose; overview; general restrictions. (a) Purpose. The purpose of the planned unit development(PUD)process is to permit variations from the strict application of certain standards of the Town's zone districts in order to allow flexibility for landowners to creatively plan for the overall development of their land and thereby, to achieve a more desirable development than would be possible through the strict application of the minimum standards of this Development Code. Specifically, it is the purpose of the planned unit development process is to: (1) Allow creativity. Allow a creative approach to the development and use of land and related physical facilities to produce better developments and to obtain amenities for residents of the PUD and the public in general. (2) Allow variations. Allow a developer variations from certain requirements of the underlying zone district, provided such variations are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and will result in benefits for the community.. (3) Maximize choice. Maximize choice in the type of developments available to the public. (4) Preserve natural features. Create patterns of development that preserve valued environmental resource lands and avoid the development of natural hazard areas. (5) Create efficient land use patterns. Relate residential,commercial and community facilities in a manner that promotes cost effective transportation systems and population distribution,and enhances pedestrian access and movement that might not otherwise be achieved under the strict application of the requirements of underlying zoning. (G) Ensure public input. Ensure appropriate levels of public input to the planning process,so that sensitive areas of the community can be developed in accordance with community goals and objectives. (7) Increase_ Community Value.Allow flexibility for landowners to beneficially plan for the overall development of their land to the extent that the final product presents a net positive result for the community. (b) Overview of PUD Procedure. A PUD application shall be reviewed pursuant to the u.\/\ dM TC Ord.00-15 Page 42 procedures and standards of this Section. (1) Major or Minor PUD. The procedures applicable to a particular PUD are dependent on whether the project is classified as a minor or a major PUD. The criteria for classifying projects as major or minor are described in Table 5-3, Criteria for Classifying PUD's as Major or Minor. If a proposed development activity does not fit within the criteria listed in the table, then the Planning Director shall determine whether the proposal should be classified as a major or minor development, taking into consideration whether or not it would be beneficial for the Town to review a sketch plan of the proposed development. Ar ' � TC Ord.00-15 Page 43 TABLE 5-3 CRITERIA FOR CLASSIFYING PUD'S AS MAJOR OR MINOR Major PUD Minor PUD A major PUD is a project that meets any A minor PUD is a project that meets all of the of the following criteria: following criteria: New Development New Development • Contains more than four(4) • Contains no more than four(4) dwelling/hotel/lodge or other residential dwelling/hotel/ units. lodge or other residential units. • Contains more than four thousand • Contains no more than four thousand(4,000) (4,000) sq. ft. of nonresidential space. sq. ft. of nonresidential space. Additions/Re-Development Additions/Re-Development • Adds more than six(6) • Adds no more than six(6)dwelling/hotel/lodge dwelling/hotel/lodge or other residential or other residential units. units. • Increases the existing floor area or footprint of • Increases the existing floor area or the a nonresidential building by no than ten percent footprint of a nonresidential building by (10%). more than ten percent(10%). (2) Steps in PUD review process. A major PUD shall be processed according to the following review steps, as further described herein: a. Sketch PUD plan review by the Planning Commission and Town Council. b. Preliminary PUD plan review by the Planning Commission. c. Preliminary PUD plan review by the Town Council. d. Final PUD plan review by the Town Council. A minor PUD shall be processed according to the same review steps as a major PUD,except that a minor PUD shall not be required to proceed through sketch PUD plan review. (3) One (1)major PUD under review. Unless otherwise authorized by resolution of the Town Council, there shall only be one (1)major PUD application under r,64c� •ft TC Ord.00-15 Page 44 review by the Planning Commission and one (1)other major PUD application under review by the Town Council at any time. The Planning Director shall establish procedures to administer this policy,based on the following provisions: a. Priority to first complete application. Scheduling priority shall be given to the first complete major PUD application received,provided that: 1. Any project that has received sketch plan approval shall receive scheduling priority upon submission of its preliminary and final plan applications; and ii. Any major PUD application that the Town Council determines serves a public purpose shall receive scheduling priority over all other development applications. b. Requests for additional information. In order to allow for development review to proceed in a timely and fair manner,applicants who are requested by the Planning Commission or Town Council to submit additional information or to amend their application which are necessary for the uninterrupted continuous review shall submit a complete package of the requested materials to the Planning Director at least seven(7)days prior to the next scheduled meeting of that board. If an applicant does not submit the requested materials in a timely manner or if the applicant requests that the processing of their application be delayed,the next prioritized application will be scheduled before that review board. However, once the applicant submits a complete package of the requested materials to the Planning Director or the applicant has requested that the review of their application recommence, the application shall receive the next available scheduling priority, as determined by the Planning Director, over all other development applications. The provisions of this paragraph shall also apply to a submission being processed under the provisions of Chapter 16. C. Sketch plan review accommodation. If the processing status of an existing application with scheduling priority allows, the Planning Director may schedule a new sketch plan application for review before the Planning Commission or the Town Council at meetings that do not delay the processing of the existing application. (c) General Restrictions. Although one (1)of the purposes of these PUD regulations is to provide flexibility in the land development process, this Section is intended to define the limits of that flexibility. The following restrictions shall apply to all PUD's: (1) Minimum land area. There shall be no minimum land area qualification in order to be eligible to apply for a PUD,provided that PUD approval shall not be granted solely to permit variations to develop a single lot,building or use. W- to TC Ord.00-15 Page 45 (2) Location. A PUD may be developed on any land located within the Town. (3) Uses. The land uses permitted in a PUD shall be limited to those uses that are allowed,or are allowed by special review, in the underlying zone district. (3) Maximum buildout. The Comprehensive Plan contains an analysis of future buildout of single-family subdivisions and other developments within the Town limits. It identifies the maximum number of future lots/units and commercial/other space that may be developed within each subdivision,parcel or other development. The Unit Equivalency Chart, found in Table 5-4,defines what constitutes a unit by distinguishing between the various dwelling types and sizes and specifying an equivalency factor to be utilized to establish the number of existing units within a currently developearcel and/or the future buildout units that will be generated by the proposed new development. The buildout analysis for thepWU ose of determinn maximum,buildout, shall be conducted as follows: a. Unde_v-elparcels. For_undevel rcels containing no dwelling unit�he_Com rehensive Plan_future buildout chart shall be tised to establish the maxtmum number of future lots/umts and mm space that may be developed within theparcel an_d the Unit Equtvaleny Chart shall_be used to determine the number of future buildout units that are bein$prsed the new development. b. Partially. to ed parcels. Forpartially developed"r.cels,each existing dwelling shall first be counted as one l unit The_total number shall then be subtracted from the future buildout numbers ecified within the Comprehensive Plan buildout chart to establish the available-buildout unit amount The Unit Equivalencv_Chut shall then be used to evaluate the existing devement h g ne tm buildout unit amount. The total of the available and existing unit amounts shall then be considered as the future buildout unit amount used for deteermmin maximum buildout and the Unit Eguival-e Chart shall be.used to determine the number of future buildout units that are beinproposed by the new degel�men_t. c. Fully deve,IiArcels. For parcels wh_.ere t_he total number of the existing dwelling units,.where each dwelling unit is counted asone u_pin eguals the future buildout number specified within tbe_Cqmli rehensive Plan_ buildout chart,-the Unit_—uival-en_cy ha.- be_used to evaluate_the existing development and to establish the exists buildout unit amount. The existine buildout unit amount shall then be considered as t_he future buildout unit amount for determining maximum buildout and the Unit Egu_ry_ale"Chart shall be used to determine the number of future bulldou_t units that are being onoeb vopment. If the Town Council determines that the PUD complies with the applicable _5y tw TC Ord.00-15 Page 46 provisions of this Subsection (c), General Restrictions,the standards of Section 16A-5-310, Review Standards, and any other applicable provisions of this Code, then a PUD may develop up to,but not more than, sixty-five percent (65%)of the maximum number of future lots/units and commercial/other space identified for that subdivision or other development in the buildout analysis. The Town Council may approve a buildout that is less than or greater than sixty-five percent(65%),based on the following standards: a. Lesser buildout. A lesser buildout may be approved by the Town if, during the evaluation of the compliance of the PUD with the applicable review standards, it is determined that there are site specific physical constraints on the property that would limit its appropriateness for buildout, (such as the presence of wetlands, flood plains, steep slopes or wildlife habitat),or the applicant has been unable to adequately provide public improvements or services necessary for the development,or the buildout would be incompatible with surrounding land uses or with the character of the community as described in Section 16A-4-340, Building Design Guidelines to Preserve Community Character, or if other pertinent limitations are identified. b. Greater buildout. A greater buildout may be approved if the Town Council finds that the PUD achieves one(1)or more of the purposes described in Subsection(c)(6), Community Purposes for PUD's, and the PUD complies with the other applicable provisions of this Subsection (c),General Restrictions, the standards of Section 16A-5-310,Review Standards, and any other applicable provisions of this Code. No buildout may be permitted to exceed one-hundred percent(100%) of the maximum number of future lots/units and commercial/other space listed for that subdivision, parcel or other development, except that under unique and exceptional circumstances where it can be sufficiently demonstrated by the applicant that the resulting development will, for good-case-shown,exceed the PUD review criteria standards, a reconsideration and amendment of the future buildout analysis chart allocation for that subdivision,parcel or other development may be considered. The Town Council shall then adopt an ordinance,approved by at least three-quarters('/4)of the members of the Town Council present and voting,amending the future buildout analysis chart and identifying the reasons why the amendment is warranted. owss 4 TC Ord.00-15 Page 47 TABLE 54,UNIT EQUIVALENCY SQUARE UNIT CATEGORIES FOOTAGE EQUIVALENT MULTI-FAMILY I Less Than 1,000 s.f 0.5 MULTI-FAMILY II 1,000 s.f- 1,500 s.f. 0.50+ .05 Per Each Additional 100 s.f.Above 1,000 s.f. MULTI-FAMILY III 1,501 s.f- 2,500 s.f. 0.75+ .10 Per Each Additional 100 s.f Above 1,500 s.f. MULTI-FAMILY IV More Than 2,500 s.f. 1.75+ .25 Per Each Additional 100 s.f.Above 2,500 s.f. SINGLE-FAMILY I Less Than 2,500 s.f 1 SINGLE-FAMILY II 2,500 s.f. -4,500 s.f. 1.0+ .10 Per Each Additional 100 s.f.Above 2,500 s.f. SINGLE-FAMILY III More than 4,500 s.f. 3.0+.50 Per Each Additional 100 s.f Above 4,500 s.f. HOTEL/LODGING I Less Than 500s.f. 0.25 HOTEL/LODGING I1 500 s.f. - 1,000 s.f. 0.25+ .10 Per Each Additional 100 s.f.Above 500 s.f. HOTEL/LODGING III More than 1,000 s.f. 0.75+ .25 Per Each Additional 100 s.f.Above 1,000 s.f. (5) Dimensional limitations. Certain dimensional limitations applicable to the property may be varied within a PUD. The limitations that may be varied are those of the underlying zone district; or, for properties for which a PUD or other development plan has previously been approved, the limitations set by that approval. For any property designated PUD or SPA without an underlying zone district,the apphcant_shall submit an application for an amendment to the Official Zone District Map to designate the unde >�zone district for the pry Th_s_apphcatton_shall be submitted in_conlunchon with the preliminary PUD apphcahon_and shall be used to rezone the property at the time of final PUD approval to a zone district containing dimensional limitations in order to establish the applicable dimensional limitations for the property. Only the following dimensional limitations may be varied: a. Maximum allowable height of any structure within the PUD; b. Minimum open space requirement for the PUD; C. Maximum allowable floor area of the PUD; d. Minimum area of lots within the PUD; and e. Minimum setbacks for buildings within the PUD. A dimensional limitation may be varied when the Town Council finds that the r TC Ord.00-15 Page 48 PUD achieves one(1)or more of the applicable purposes listed in Subsection (c)(6), Community Purposes for PUD's,that granting of the variation is necessary for that purpose to be achieved, and that the resulting development will be consistent with the provisions of Subsection (c)(7), Standards for Granting of Variations, and Section 16A-5-310, Review Standards. (6) Community purposes for PUD's. The Comprehensive Plan identifies certain purposes the community intends to achieve as it develops. The following purposes shall be used in determining whether the buildout for a PUD may exceed sixty-five percent(65%)of that identified in the buildout analysis and whether any of the parcel's dimensional limitations should be varied: a. Provision of restricted housing. A parcel's maximum buildout may be achieved and its dimensional limitations may be varied to offer an incentive to applicants to provide more restricted housing within the PUD than would otherwise be required by this Development Code, particularly in those priority locations for such housing identified within the Comprehensive Plan. b. Encourage sustainable development. A parcel's maximum buildout may be achieved and its dimensional limitations may be varied to encourage sustainable development within the Town that diversifies the mix of lodging,retail and dining uses and that is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. Sustainable development would be of-the,type that creates a sense of place where one can live and work within a small defined service area as well as where recreation,public transportation, open space3 ggMnal services and shoppm�are within reasonable walking distance. C. Provide open space and/or avoid wildlife habitat. A parcel's maximum buildout may be achieved and its dimensional limitations may be varied to provide necessary site planning flexibility to enable the development to provide more and higher quality open space or to conserve critical wildlife habitat lands. This shall be accomplished in such a way as to maintain these lands as large, contiguous areas. Such lands shall not be fragmented into small, unconnected areas by development, unless the applicant demonstrates that this arrangement will result in the most suitable development pattern for the property, and that the lands providing valued open space or critical wildlife habitat have been protected. Where applicable,connections of such lands on the site to such lands on adjacent properties shall be accomplished. d. Encourage better design. A parcel's dimensional limitations may be varied (but its maximum buildout may not be achieved)to allow for greater variety in the type, design and layout of buildings. Structures shall be designed to be compatible, in terms of height,mass, scale, orientation and configuration, with other buildings in the PUD and with TC Ord.00-15 Page 49 surrounding uses, yet shall avoid uniformity of design. Various types of residential uses may be combined within the PUD (when allowed by the underlying zone district),to promote more efficient land use patterns and increased open space. e. Develop necessary public facilities. A parcel's maximum buildout may be achieved and its dimensional limitations may be varied to provide an incentive for an applicant to develop,or contribute to the development of,necessary public facilities, such as public parking and transportation facilities,public recreation facilities and other public facilities consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and the Town's goals and objectives. The facilities may be located within,or outside of the PUD, but shall be facilities that meet the needs not only of project residents, but also of other residents of and visitors to the Town. Achieving one (1)or more of the applicable purposes listed above does not,by itself, grant any development entitlement for the buildout of a PUD to exceed sixty-five percent(65%) of that identified in the buildout analysis or for any of the parcel's dimensional limitations to be varied. (7) Standards for granting of variations. Any PUD that requests any of the variations authorized in Subsection(c)(5),Dimensional Limitations, shall also comply with the following standards: a. Height. A request to increase the maximum allowable height for any building or structure may be approved by the Town Council,provided that least fifty percent(50%)of a building or structure's footprint within the PUD conforms to the height limits of the underlying zone district. In exceptional and unique circumstances, a structure may,however,be permitted to exceed the fifty percent (50%) limitation if the applicant is able to sufficiently demonstrate through detailed view plane analysis that views from surrounding properties will not be adversely affected and that the proposed structure will be compatible, in terms of height,mass, scale, orientation and configuration, with other buildings in the PUD and with surrounding uses. Said variation shall be approved by at least three- quarters(3/4)of the Town Council members of the Town Council present and voting,_for good cause shown an_d by identifying the reasons why the height variation is warranted. b. Open space and minimum lot area. A variation to reduce the minimum open space requirement or to reduce minimum lot area (in order to cluster lots) may be permitted if: 1. Such variation will not be detrimental to the character of the proposed development or to surrounding properties; ii. The proposed development shall include open space for the TC Ord.00-15 Page 50 mutual benefit of the entire development; and iii. The open space that is provided is accessible and available to at least all dwelling units and lots for which the open space is intended. C. Minimum building setbacks. Minimum building setbacks shall be established by the PUD plan,provided adequate distance shall be left between buildings for necessary access and fire protection, and to ensure proper ventilation, light, air and snowmelt between buildings, and to minimize the effects of transmission of noise between units and between buildings. (8) Parking. The number of parking spaces in the PUD shall be that required for the underlying zone district, unless a reduction in that.requirement is granted, pursuant to Section 16A-4-310(c),Reduction of Required Parking. (9) Road standards. A PUD may be permitted to deviate from the Town's road standards, to enable the development to achieve greater efficiency of infrastructure design and installation through clustered or compact forms of development or to achieve greater sensitivity to environmental features,when the following minimum design principles are followed: a. Safe, efficient access. The circulation system shall be designed to provide safe, convenient access to all areas of the proposed development using the minimum practical roadway length. Access shall be by a public right-of-way,private vehicular or pedestrian way or a commonly owned easement. b. Internal pathways. Internal pathways shall be provided to form a logical, safe and convenient system for pedestrian access to dwelling units and common areas,with appropriate linkages off-site. C. Emergency vehicles. Roadways shall be designed to permit access by emergency vehicles to all lots or units. An access easement shall be granted for emergency and utility vehicles, as applicable, to use private roadways in the development for the purpose of providing emergency services and for installation,maintenance and repair of utilities. d. Principal access points. Principal vehicular access points shall be designed to provide for smooth traffic flow,minimizing hazards to vehicular,pedestrian or bicycle traffic. Where a PUD abuts a major collector, arterial road or highway,direct access to such road or highway from individual lots, units or buildings shall be prohibited when other reasonable access options are available. e. Snow storage. Adequate areas shall be provided to store snow removed from the an TC Ord.00-15 Page 51 internal street network and from off-street parking areas. (Ord. 4-1998 §1; Ord. 13-1998 §1; Ord. 1-1999 §1; Ord. 6-1999 §1) Sec. 16A-5-310. Review standards. In addition to demonstrating its compliance with the provisions of Section 16A-5-300(c), General Restrictions, and with all other applicable provisions of this Code, a proposed PUD shall also comply with the following review standards: (1) Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. The PUD shall be consistent with the intent of the Town's Comprehensive Plan. (2) Preservation of community character. The development proposed for the PUD shall be consistent with the standards of Section 16A-4-340, Building Design Guidelines to Preserve Community Character, shall be compatible with, or an enhancement of,the character of existing land uses in the area and shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. (3) Creative Approach. The development proposed for the PUD represents a creative approach to the development and use of land and related physical facilities to produce better developments and to provide amenities for residents of the PUD and the public in general. (4) Landscaping. Proposed landscaping for the PUD shall provide sufficient buffering of uses from one another(both within the PUD and between the PUD and surrounding lands) to minimize noise, glare and other adverse impacts, shall create attractive streetscapes and parking areas and shall be consistent with the character of the Town. (5) Comply with development evaluation standards. The PUD shall comply with all applicable provisions of Article IV of this Development Code, Development Evaluation Standards. (6) Suitability for development. The property proposed for the PUD shall be suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental features and any natural or man-made hazards that affect its development potential. (7) Adequate facilities. The applicant shall show that: a. Adequate facilities will be provided to the PUD for water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection,roads and pedestrian circulation; b. The PUD has been located so as to be reasonably convenient in relation to police and fire protection, emergency medical services and schools; and c. The PUD will accommodate the efficient provision of transit facilities and Pow TC Ord.00-15 Page 52 services. (8) Spatial pattern shall be efficient. The PUD shall be located to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or that require duplication or premature extension of public facilities. a. Roads. Any new road developed to serve the PUD shall be continuous and in alignment with existing platted streets to which the street is to be connected. Where appropriate,new streets shall be planned so that they can create an interconnected Town road network, with provision for adequate road and utility easements. Where cul-de-sacs are used in the development, the applicant is encouraged to provide a trail or similar pedestrian link between them. h. Water and sewer lines. Any water or sewer line extension necessary to serve the PUD shall be consistent with the Snowmass Water and Sanitation District's service plan and the Town's Comprehensive Plan. (9) Phasing. If the PUD is to be developed in phases, then each phase shall contain the required streets,utilities, landscaping and other improvements that are necessary and desirable for residents of the project. If the PUD incorporates any amenities for the benefit of the Town, such as trail connections,these shall be constructed within the first phase of the project, or, if this is not possible, then as early in the project as is reasonable. (Ord. 4-1998 §1; Ord. 13-1998 §1; Ord. 1-1999 §1) See. 16A-5-320. Sketch plan (a) Purpose. The sketch plan review is an opportunity for the Town and the applicant to engage in an exploratory discussion of a development proposal, to raise issues and concerns and to examine alternative approaches to development of the property. The applicant is encouraged to provide a written or graphic description of any alternative ideas that were considered as the sketch plan was being prepared. It should be expected that the development proposal may evolve during the course of sketch plan review. (b) Sketch Plan Review Intent and Issues. To encourage the consideration of alternatives and to allow the sketch plan to evolve, overly detailed preliminary plan level sketch plans will not be considered. The questions the Planning Commission and Town Council should consider in a conceptual manner during review of the sketch plan (depending upon the size and complexity of the proposal)include the following: (1) Use. Is the use proposed for the property generally appropriate in this location? Is it consistent with the intent of the underlying zone district and the character of surrounding uses? (2) Comprehensive Plan. Is the proposed development generally consistent with the Town's Comprehensive Plan? Is the proposed buildout within the range _ W TC Ord.00-15 Page 53 anticipated for the property? If the applicant proposes a buildout in excess of sixty-five percent(65%) of that identified in the Comprehensive Plan,then are the community purposes the applicant proposes to achieve the appropriate ones for this development to accomplish? (3) Architecture and landscaping. Are the buildings proposed to be developed in appropriate locations? Is the mass, scale and density of the buildings generally compatible with the character of the community and that of surrounding buildings? How much of the site is proposed to be common or dedicated open space? Is this an adequate amount of open space and does it appear to be in the appropriate locations? (4) Natural resource and hazard areas. What are the natural resource and hazard areas on the property? Is mitigation appropriate? (5) Access and circulation. Is the conceptual location, alignment and type of entry roads and the primary on-site roads acceptable? Should the applicant provide transportation options for residents, visitors, guests and employees and, if so, what type of options may be most appropriate? (6) Parking. Should the applicant provide on-site parking for the development in compliance with the standards of this Code, or should the applicant reduce parking below these standards,as provided in Section 16A-4-310,Off-Street Parking Standards? (7) Timetable. What is the proposed timetable for the development? Is it most appropriate for the development to occur all at once or in phases? If phasing is appropriate,then which portions of the project should proceed first? (S) Community welfare. Do the concepts contained in the proposed development promote the public health, safety and welfare? (c) Sketch Plan Review Procedures. The following procedures shall apply to an application for review of a sketch PUD plan. These procedures are illustrated in Figure 5-3, Sketch PUD Application Procedures (1) Pre-application conference. Attendance at a pre-application conference is mandatory prior to submission of an application for sketch PUD plan review. (2) Submission of application. The applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Director that contains the following materials: a. Minimum contents. The minimum contents for any application, as specified in Section 16A-5-40(b), Minimum Contents. b. Location map. A scale map showing the location and size of the site, and existing land uses, zone districts and major roads within three hundred 000_f� sop TC Ord.00-15 Page 54 (300) feet of the site. The name, location and boundaries of any subdivisions that are part of the larger tract shall also be shown. c. Statement of objectives. A written description of the proposed development. This shall include a statement of the objectives to be achieved by the planned unit development and a conceptual description of any proposed variations from the standards of the underlying zone district that are being requested. d. Sketch plan. A sketch development plan,which shall include the following: i. General. The property boundaries of the site, title of the proposed development, date of preparation,bar-type or graphic scale and north arrow(designated as true north). ii. Site characteristics. Existing site characteristics, showing existing groves of trees and other major types of vegetation, structures within the site,the location of roads and structures within three hundred(300) feet of the site,wildfire hazard areas,wildlife habitat areas, streams, floodplains, drainage ways, topography(depicted at a minimum of ten-foot contour intervals),areas of natural and disturbed slopes in excess of thirty-percent grade,prominent ridgelines,avalanche areas and any other prominent geologic hazards or features. iii. Utilities. Approximate locations of existing major utility lines and easements, irrigation ditches,bridges and similar physical features, and existing development on adjacent property. Conceptual plans for water supply, sewage disposal, fire protection and drainage facilities shall also be provided, which plans may be in a prose format. iv. Proposed land use. General location and configuration of proposed land use types, including setbacks and common and public open space. The plan shall show the proposed lots or development tracts and street layout, indicating the approximate area of individual lots or tracts, access to the property, connection of proposed streets to existing streets and plans for pedestrian circulation and trails. If the applicant intends to develop the PUT)in phases,then the sketch plan shall provide a land use master plan for the applicant's entire land ownership,unless the applicant shall demonstrate to the Town Council, at its sole discretion,that preparation of a land use master plan for the entire ownership would place an unreasonable burden on the applicant or would be premature at this time. Following approval of the sketch plan, the applicant may, if so authorized by the Town Council, submit the preliminary plan in phases and need OOM TC Ord.00-15 Page 55 not submit detailed land use information for the entire ownership in order to be deemed to have submitted a complete preliminary plan. V. Landscaping. A simple conceptual depiction and/or narrative description of the intended revegetation and landscaping components of the plan. e. Simple sketches. Simple sketches, massing diagrams or models, that are not required to show detailed fenestration or architectural details, which show building mass, scale and height in a conceptual manner in relation to natural features, and the relationship of the various development components to their respective sites, the surrounding area and each other. A sketch or narrative description should be included that adequately expresses the typical or overall intended architectural theme, character and fenestration for the project. f. Summary. A sketch plan summary containing the following: i. Type. A description of the type of dwelling units and other buildings or structures. ii. Size. The average square footage of all dwelling units,buildings and other structures proposed by type of unit, the total square footage of all structures by type, the approximate number of bedrooms and the gross residential density in units per acre. iii. Floor area. The ratio of the total floor area of all proposed structures, by type, to the area of land within the development. iv. Population. The anticipated population to be generated by the development(permanent residents, employees and tourists). V. Market. A general statement of the target market and form of ownership for the dwelling units. vi. Open space. The amount of common and/or public dedicated open space. vii. Height. The maximum and average height of all buildings and structures,by type. viii. Employees. The number of employees required to operate the proposed development, together with a calculation of employee housing requirements and a conceptual proposal for how required employee housing will be provided. ix. Water supply and sewage disposal. Source of domestic water 00� 0/sow TC Ord.00-15 Page 56 supply and general means of sewage disposal. X. Access and easements. Evidence of the existence of legal access to the property, together with a description of any existing easements and covenants affecting any land within the subject property. xi. Parking, circulation and transit. The anticipated number of parking spaces,the proposed locations of these spaces and a statement of whether the project will comply with the underlying zone district standards or is requesting a variance from those standards. Additionally, a conceptual plan setting forth on- and off-site circulation patterns and any transit facilities associated with the project. xii. Timetable and Phasing. The proposed timetable and phasing for the development, identifying the number of anticipated PUD filings. (Ord.4-1998 §1; Ord. 1-1999 §1; Ord. 6-1999 §1) (3) Staff review. Staff review of the application shall be accomplished, as specified in Section 16A-5-50, Staff Review of Application. Staff shall then meet with the applicant to provide preliminary comments, discuss issues and concerns, request additional information necessary to adequately evaluate the proposal and make recommendations regarding the application. The applicant will then have the opportunity to amend their application or provide additional information in response to the staff comments. Upon receipt of the requested information, or within ten(10)days of the staff meeting,whichever occurs first, a public notice that the Planning Commission and Town Council will hold a joint hearing to consider the application shall be given by publication,mailing and posting of notice,pursuant to Section 16A-5-60(b), Manner and Timing of Notice. (4) Joint meeting. A complete copy of the application shall be forwarded to the Planning Commission and Town Council, together with a copy of the staff review. The Planning Commission and Town Council shall hold one (1)joint meeting to hear the initial presentation of the application by the applicant. Thereafter,the Planning Commission shall conduct its review of the application. (5) Resolution. Upon completion of its review of the application,the Planning Commission shall,by resolution,provide direction to the applicant on the sketch plan. The resolution shall either authorize the applicant to submit a preliminary plan or shall state that the applicant must submit a new sketch plan prior to proceeding to preliminary plan review. When preparing the resolution, the Planning Commission shall consider all relevant materials and testimony, and whether the application is generally consistent with Section 16A-5-300(c), General Restrictions, and Section 16A-5-310, Review Standards. so a. Resolution authorizing preliminary plan. If the resolution authorizes the applicant to submit a preliminary plan,then the resolution shall identify any aspects of the sketch plan that should be modified for the preliminary plan to be acceptable to the Town, and the types of modifications the applicant should consider. The resolution shall also identify any other issues the applicant should consider when preparing the preliminary plan,the materials the applicant will be required to submit and the studies the applicant will be required to conduct. b. Resolution requiring new sketch plan. If the resolution states that the applicant must submit a new sketch plan prior to proceeding to preliminary plan review,then the resolution shall identify any areas of disagreement between the Town and the applicant, including those standards of the Development Code or elements of the Comprehensive Plan with which the sketch plan failed to comply. (6) Town Council action. The Planning Commission's resolution shall be forwarded to the Town Council. The Town Council shall hold a public hearing to consider the application and the Planning Commission's resolution. The public hearing shall be conducted pursuant to Section 16A-5-70(2), Conduct of Public Hearing. The Town Council shall prepare its own resolution taking action on the application that may accept the Planning Commission's resolution, or that may modify any aspect of said resolution. When preparing the resolution, the Town Council shall consider all relevant materials and testimony, and whether the application is generally consistent with Section 16A-5-300(c), General Restrictions, and Section 16A-5-310,Review Standards. (7) Effect of resolution. Adoption of the sketch plan resolution by the Town shall not constitute approval of a PUD,or permission to proceed with construction of any aspect of the development. Such action shall only constitute authorization for the applicant to submit a preliminary PUD, in accordance with the representations made by the applicant and in response to the direction on the sketch plan provided by the Town in the resolution. (8) Expiration. The applicant shall be required to submit the preliminary plan application within twelve (12)months after the date of approval of the resolution. Failure to submit the application within this time period shall render the resolution null and void,and require the applicant to submit a new sketch plan for review by the Town. The Town Council may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant an extension of the deadline to submit a preliminary plan application,provided that the applicant requests the extension in writing no less than thirty(30)days prior to such lapse and said extension is approved by at least three-quarters('/4)of the Town Council members of the Town Council present and voting. UO 00 TC Ord.00-15 Page 58 FIGURE 5.3 SKETCH PUD APPLICATION PROCEDURES PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE (MANDATORY) SUBMIT APPLICATION STAFF PUBLIC REVIEW NOTICE JOINT PLAN.COMMJ TOWN COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING d TOWN COUNCIL RESOLUTION AUTHORIZE DIRECT APPLICANT SUBMISSION OF TO SUBMIT PRELIMINARY PLAN NEW SKETCH PLAN OR (Ord.4-1998 §l; Ord.6-1999 §1) Sec. 16A-5-340. Preliminary plan. (a) Purpose. The purpose of preliminary plan review is for the applicant to formulate detailed,properly designed/engineered solutions to the issues and concerns identified during sketch plan review, and to address, in a detailed manner, all other issues that are relevant to the preliminary plan. For minor PUD applications, where no sketch plan was submitted,the purpose of the preliminary plan is to present detailed,properly designed/engineered plans for consideration by the Town and the public. The burden at the preliminary plan stage is on the applicant to provide detailed information and mitigation proposals to be evaluated by the Town and the public. For any PUD application that also involves subdivision or that requires approval of an amendment of the Official Zone District Map, the application for subdivision or rezoning shall be submitted with, and considered at the same time as,the preliminary PUD plan review. (b) Preliminary Plan Review Intent and Issues. The questions the Planning Commission - `7 TC Ord.00-15 Page 59 and Town Council should consider in a detailed manner during review of the preliminary plan(depending upon the size and complexity of the proposal)include the following: (1) Response to sketch plan issues and concerns. Has the applicant provided detailed, sufficient and appropriate responses to each of the issues and concerns identified during the sketch plan review? (2) Zone district limitations. Does the proposed development comply with all of the limitations of the underlying zone district? If the applicant proposes to vary any of the property's dimensional limitations, then does the application comply with all of the applicable standards for granting of the variation? (3) Comprehensive Plan. Is the proposed development consistent with all relevant policies and recommendations of the Town's Comprehensive Plan? If the applicant proposes a buildout in excess sixty-five percent(65%) of that identified in the Comprehensive Plan, then will the community purposes that are most appropriate to be accomplished by the proposed development be achieved? (4) Architectural plans. Are the proposed mass, scale,height, density, volume, materials,colors and detailed design elements of the buildings compatible with, appropriate for or an enhancement of the character of the community and with surrounding buildings? (5) Landscaping and open space. Is the type, amount, size, species and location of proposed landscaping adequate and suitable for the development? Has adequate landscaping been provided as a buffer between uses and around the perimeter of the development? Has the applicant demonstrated that existing vegetation and trees on the site that should be protected will be so protected? Which specific areas of the site will be designated as open space; what is the proposed size, use and landscaping of each area? What are the preliminary plans for the homeowner's association or condominium association to maintain said open space? (6) Natural hazard areas. What is the site specific location and characteristics of any geologic hazards, steep slopes, flood plains and similar hazards on the property? Will any of these natural areas pose a potential threat to life or property? If so, what specific measures will be employed to avoid,minimize or mitigate these dangers? (7) Natural resource areas. What is the site specific location and characteristics of any wildlife habitat areas,riparian areas,wetlands and other valued natural features on the property? What are the anticipated impacts of the proposed development on these features? Has the proposed development been designed so it will comply with the standards of this Development Code that apply to these natural resource areas? TC Ord.00-15 Page 60 (8) Grading and drainage. What is the extent of soil and vegetation disturbance planned for the site? How will disturbed areas be stabilized both during construction and following completion of the project? Where will excavated materials be stockpiled? Will any retaining structures be employed and, if so, what will be their design specifications and materials? How will storm water be handled both during construction and following completion of the project? (9) Transportation impact. How many vehicle trips will be generated, and what is the anticipated public transportation ridership from the proposed development? What is the capacity of the intersections that the proposed development will impact? What will be the impacts of the proposed development on the Town's public transportation system,road capacities and parking facilities and how will these impacts be mitigated? What measures will the project employ to ensure that following development,roadways within the Town will continue to function at the adopted level of service standard? Have roads on- and off-site been designed in a safe and efficient manner,to connect the site to other activity areas and destination points? (10) Necessary facilities. Has the applicant provided detailed engineering plans and reports demonstrating the type, location and capacity of the water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, fire protection and other necessary facilities that will be constructed to serve the project? Will these facilities be available in a timely manner to serve the project? (11) Restricted housing. What is the specific mix and configuration of housing that will be provided to meet the Town's restricted housing requirements? What guarantees has the applicant agreed to provide to ensure that such housing will be available at the time it has been required by the Town? (12) Fiscal impact. Will the proposed development have a positive or negative fiscal impact upon the Town and other taxing districts that provide services to it? If the proposal is shown to have a negative fiscal impact, then what measures will the applicant employ to mitigate those costs? (13) Energy conservation. What will be the energy utilization of the significant energy-consuming elements of the project(such as heating systems, swimming pools, saunas, Jacuzzis, etc.). What specific active and passive techniques will the development employ to promote energy conservation and take advantage of solar and alternative energy source opportunities? (14) Air quality. What will be the primary sources of air pollution from the project? What will be the quantity and composition of pollutants that will be discharged on a daily and seasonal basis and what are the dispersal qualities of the site that will affect the pollutants that are generated? What geographic area will be impacted by these pollutants? What techniques will the development employ to reduce the impacts of these pollutants? I rw1 I TC Ord.00-15 Page 61 (15) Construction management plan. What is the proposed plan for phasing of the project? What is its construction schedule? What measures will be employed to mitigate construction impacts? (16) Community welfare. Does the proposed development in its totality promote the public health, safety and welfare? (c) Preliminary Plan Review Procedure. The following procedures shall apply to an application for review of a preliminary PUD plan. This procedures is illustrated in Figure 5-4, Preliminary PUD Application Procedures. (1) Pre-application conference. Attendance at a pre-application conference is mandatory prior to submission of an application for PUD preliminary plan review. (2) Submission of application. The applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Director that contains the following materials: a. Minimum contents. The minimum contents for any application, as specified in Section 16A-5-40(b), Minimum Contents. b. Preliminary development plan. A preliminary development plan, which shall include the following: i. General. The property boundaries of the site, title of the proposed development, date of preparation, bar-type or graphic scale,north arrow(designated as true north)and legal description of the property. ii. Proposed development. The preliminary plan shall show the proposed dimensions and locations of all buildings, public and private roadways, existing and proposed utility lines and fire hydrants, service areas, emergency vehicle access areas, parking facilities,pedestrian pathways, trails and use areas, common open areas,public open spaces,public transportation facilities, drainage facilities and detention areas, snow storage/removal areas, trash storage areas and other information necessary to allow detailed review of the project design. Existing and proposed contours shall be shown at two- foot intervals, or less. iii. Surrounding structures. The preliminary plan shall depict structures and landmarks within three hundred (300) feet of the site, so as to show the relationship of the proposed development to its surroundings. _70 00 TC Ord.00-15 Page 62 iv. Chart. The preliminary plan shall contain a chart of proposed land uses by acreage, including the percentage of land coverage by each type of use, together with a detailed listing of the following development parameters: 1. Dimensions. Proposed square footage and height of buildings. 2. Dwelling units. Proposed number of bedrooms; square footage of dwelling units by type of unit; proposed number of dwelling units per acre. 3. Size of commercial space. Proposed square footage of commercial space. 4. Floor area. Proposed maximum allowable floor area (FAR). 5. Parking. Proposed number of parking spaces. 6. Open space. Proposed amount of open space. 7. Restricted housing. Proposed number of restricted housing units, with number of bedrooms and amount of square footage. C. Comparison to sketch plan. When applicable, a statement shall be provided comparing the preliminary plan to the sketch plan, noting any changes, including those made in response to comments provided by the Town in its review of the sketch plan. d. Listing of proposed variations. A statement identifying each proposed variation from the underlying zone district standards, describing how the variations conform with those authorized for a PUD. e. Architectural plans. Preliminary architectural plans for all multiple- family and single-family attached dwellings,hotels and lodges, and other nonresidential buildings. These plans shall include: i. Elevations. Elevations at a vertical scale of not less than one- eighth inch equals one foot(1/8" = P)or larger of all significant facades of the proposed buildings. Building elevations shall be of sufficient detail to indicate building openings,alternate materials proposed for the roof and exterior of the buildings,decks and other architectural features of the buildings, including chimneys and mechanical areas and features affecting the roof lines of all proposed buildings. -7lOpp TC Ord.00-15 Page 63 ii. Floor plans. Proposed floor plans drawn at a scale of one- eighth inch equals one foot(1/8" = 1') or larger of all floors of the proposed buildings showing all living, sleeping, cooking, bathroom and storage areas. Typical floor plans with a floor layout plan may be substituted. iii. Block model. A block model illustrating the cubic volume and design of the above-ground portion of all proposed major structures included in the development. The descriptive materials shall also be sufficient to demonstrate the relationship, in terms of cubic volume, between such proposed structures in the development and other major structures in the immediate vicinity of the development. The Planning Director may accept computer generated three dimensional or other visual imagery in place of the block model if it is felt that it would better aid the public and reviewing bodies to visually understand the spatial, mass, scale and visual relationships of the development to surrounding properties. A model may still be required during the course of the review process if determined necessary to adequately evaluate the development proposal. The visual imagery and/or model shall roughly depict the building colors and materials proposed for the development. f. Landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan,depicting the type, amount, size, species and location of all plant materials,with a planting schedule. The plan shall also include conceptual irrigation plans for landscaped areas if applicable. The plan shall show the location of all existing trees with a trunk circumference of fourteen(14) inches or more measured four and one-half(4'h) feet above the ground and shall indicate which trees are proposed to be removed. Where large groves of trees are to remain undisturbed, single trees need not be located. g. Fiscal impact report. A report analyzing the anticipated fiscal impacts of the proposed development upon the Town, school district and other taxing districts that provide services to the development. This report shall be based on criteria and assumptions established in advance by the Town, as provided to the applicant prior to the submission. h. Solid waste disposal plan. A proposed solid waste disposal plan, including the anticipated volume(cubic yards) of solid waste that will be generated by the development,proposed trash container size and location of said facilities. i. Energy conservation plan. A comprehensive energy conservation plan demonstrating how the development will comply with the provisions of am TC Ord.00-15 Page 64 Section 16A-4-330, Energy Conservation, together with a detailed description of the use of solar and other alternative energy resources, including an energy utilization analysis in relation to heating systems, swimming pools, saunas, Jacuzzis and other significant energy- consuming project elements. j. Development in proximity to ski lift. A report,plan or other documentation showing that any development located in proximity to any existing or proposed ski lift complies with all appropriate rules and regulations governing said lifts, including those of the Colorado Tramway Board. k. Open space map. A map shall be submitted showing all areas to be designated as common open space and the proposed use of each common open space area, including size of each area in acres and the size of the total common open space in acres and as a percentage of the total site. In addition,the type, size and general location of the planting and other screening techniques to be used in the perimeter buffer area shall be shown on this map and the landscape plan. 1. Homeowner's or condominium association documents. Whenever there is common open space within a proposed development,the following documents shall be submitted in a preliminary form,describing how the homeowner's or condominium association will maintain said open space. i. Articles of incorporation. The form of articles of incorporation of any homeowner's association or other organization to maintain common open space within the development. ii. Bylaws. The form of bylaws of any such organization, defining its rights, duties and responsibilities. iii. Master deed. A copy of the master deed detailing the rights and privileges of individual owners in the common open space areas. iv. Covenants. The language of covenants or easements restricting the use of common open space, together with the language of covenants or agreements requiring homeowners or residents to pay any organization for maintenance of common space, and the language of deed restrictions or other covenants running with the land which provide for the maintenance of common space. m. Water supply and sewage disposal. Detailed plans and reports describing the location, type and timing of proposed water supply and TC Ord.00-15 Page 65 sewage disposal facilities and lines to be constructed. The report shall describe water conservation methods to be employed and shall provide a detailed estimate of the project's average daily and maximum water requirements and sewer impacts. The applicant shall obtain from the Snowmass Water and Sanitation District a confirmation that, based upon the data submitted for this review, the assumptions, conclusions and calculations from sketch plan review remain valid. In the alternative,the District shall identify those changes or revisions to the conceptual water and sewer reports required as a result of the District's analysis of the preliminary submission. n. Clearing, grading and drainage plans. A detailed report identifying plans for clearing, grading and drainage including: i. Limits of clearing. The location and defined limits of all clearing and/or removal of vegetation cover. ii. Grading plan. Existing and proposed grades at a contour interval of two(2) feet or less, based on field survey controls, including location with proposed grades and elevations for all buildings,roads, walks, storm sewers and other drainage structures and devices,retaining walls and other landscape features. The plan shall provide designs for sediment control devices to be employed, including specifications of how graded areas will be stabilized and revegetated after construction is completed. Any changes from the grading and drainage plan submitted with the sketch plan shall be described. o. Transportation impact analysis. All development proposals shall analyze the impact of the proposal on the Town's transportation system, road capacities and parking facilities. The Planning Director may, however, waive this requirement for proposed development that contains less than ton (194 fi_vpA5)_dwelling units, or less than two thousand(2,000) square feet of nonresidential space, or an addition to a ski area if it is determined that the transportation impacts generated by the development are negligible and that requiring a detailed analysis is not warranted. If required,the applicant shall submit the following information in a manner that permits the Town to evaluate the impacts of the proposed development: 1. Daily traffic counts. All total daily traffic counts shall be actual machine counts and not based on factored peak hour sampling. All raw traffic count data, including average daily volumes and peak hour turning movements, shall be provided in the appendices of the report. ii. Trip generation rates. The applicant shall use the following y TC Ord.00-15 Page 66 vehicular trip generation rates to calculate the development's impact on the Town road network: Single-family detached dwelling 8.0 trips/dwelling Two-family dwelling 8.0 trips/dwelling Multi-family dwelling 5.0 trips/dwelling Hotel/lodge 4.0 trips/dwelling Commercial 40.0 trips/1,000 net sq.ft. Ski area To be determined during PUD review Uses Not Listed Above To be determined by Planning Director The Planning Director shall determine the trip generation rates for uses not listed above by consulting recognized professional publications, or studies completed for resort communities similar to the Town. The Town Council may, upon request by the applicant, accept different trip generation rates than those listed above, considering whether any special transit features are planned for the development, or if there are unusual land use, occupancy or other features of the development. iii. Existing conditions. The report shall identify the exact limits of the study area, which should be determined based on engineering judgment and an understanding of existing traffic conditions at the site. Within the study area,the applicant shall describe existing roadways and intersections, including geometry and traffic control. The report shall describe existing traffic volumes and the existing level of service at intersections and roadway segments. Daily and peak hour traffic counts shall be obtained by the applicant at locations determined by the Town. iv. Anticipated ridership. A determination of the anticipated public transportation ridership, using data supplied by the Town's Transportation Department for similar projects with the Town, and the potential cost to the Town for providing public transportation services to the development. V. Trip generation and design hour volumes. A summary table shall be provided listing each type of land use,the number of units or the amount of nonresidential square footage involved, the average trip generation for each use(total daily traffic and ;Fs� TC Ord.00-15 Page 67 a.m. and p.m.peaks) and the resultant total trips generated. vi. Trip distribution. The direction of approach for site-generated traffic shall be presented in the report. The technical analysis steps,basic methods and assumptions used shall be clearly stated. vii. Trip assignments. Internal trips shall not exceed ten percent (10%)without analytical support to demonstrate how the larger figures were determined. Non-generated passerby traffic reductions in generation volumes may be considered if applicable. The trip assignment shall include filling out a copy of the Trip Table(provided by the Community Development Department) for links in the transportation network. viii. Existing and projected traffic volumes. The report shall include the following illustrations: 1. Peak hour traffic. Illustrations of current a.m. and p.m. peak hour site traffic (in and out), including turning movements. 2. Future peak hour traffic. Illustrations of future a.m. and p.m. peak hour site traffic (in and out), including turning movements for current conditions and future buildout of the project,with background traffic projected five(5) years into the future. 3. Other peak hours. Illustrations of other peak hours that may be critical to site traffic and the road system in the study area. Other peak hours will be mutually agreed upon by the Town and the applicant. ix. Capacity analysis. The report shall include a capacity analysis for all public street intersections impacted by the proposed development and for all private property access points to streets adjacent to the proposed development identified in the previously defined study area. The a.m., p.m. and any other possible peak periods shall be tested to determine which peak hours need to be analyzed. Capacity calculations(intersection and roadway segments) shall be based upon the techniques described in the "1985 Highway Capacity Manual," Transportation Research Board, Special Report 209. All capacity analysis work sheets shall be included in the appendices of the report. X. Level of service. Level of service "C" or better on all but the ;901 r TC Ord.00-15 Page 68 ten(10)peak traffic days of the year has been determined to be the acceptable design standard for all intersection and roadway segment operations. The applicant shall propose mitigation measures that are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, including illustrations of each improvement showing the length, width and other pertinent geometric features for any operation in the transportation network that is caused to exceed a level of service "C" by the proposed development. xi. Traffic accidents. Traffic accident data for affected street corridors may be required for the study. The study period will normally be three (3)years. Such locations will be specified by the Town. Where this is necessary, estimates of increased or decreased accident potential shall be evaluated for the development,particularly if the proposed development might impact existing traffic safety problems in the study area. Safety improvements shall be proposed where necessary. xii. Conclusions. The report shall contain a clear and concise executive summary, describing the study's findings. If the analysis indicates unsatisfactory levels of service,a description of proposed improvements to remedy deficiencies shall be included in the executive summary. P. Air quality analysis. All development proposals shall conduct an analysis of the proposed development's impacts on air quality. The Planning Director may, however, waive this requirement for proposed development that contains less than tea(104 five-(5)_dwelling units, or less than two thousand(2,000) square feet of nonresidential space if it is determined that the air quality impacts generated by the development are negligible and that requiring a detailed analysis is not warranted. If required, analysis shall be prepared by a recognized expert in air pollution and shall include examinations and recommendations concerning those characteristics of the site and the proposed development that could affect air quality, including,but not necessarily limited to,the following: 1. Dispersal qualities. Dispersal qualities of the site and the extent to which those qualities are expected to provide for the efficient dispersal of air pollutants generated directly by on-site activities, including such sources as space heating, fireplaces, restaurants, etc.,or indirectly by traffic within and around the proposed development site. ii. Pollutants to be discharged. Quantity and composition of pollutants expected to be discharged within the site and daily (including peak period portions thereof)or seasonal variation -7W TC Ord.00-15 Page 69 in these characteristics. iii. Trip generation and impacts. Estimated current and future trip characteristics, including average daily traffic and peak volumes for each mode on each route linking the site to significant related destinations within the relevant air shed and implied pollutant emissions. Dispersal qualities of routes related to the proposed development site and anticipated effects of any added traffic on air quality on and along such routes or their damages. iv. Construction impacts. Anticipated air pollution caused by construction of the proposed project, including impacts caused by machinery,clearing of vegetation, rock and earth moving, paving operations, preparation of materials such as gravel,hot mix and cement, and any methods proposed to mitigate such pollution and its effect. V. Special mitigation techniques. A statement regarding any special mitigation related to design, construction methods, operating policies or public or private improvements that would reduce the quantitative or qualitative impacts of pollutants produced by the proposed development and use of the proposed site and their estimated effectiveness and costs to proponents and the public. vi. Improvement of site characteristics. A statement regarding any special design construction methods,operating policies or public or private improvements that could improve the proposed development site characteristics relative to air quality of the site and of the estimated effectiveness and costs to the applicant and the public. vii. Conform with regulations. A statement regarding the extent to which the proposal and resultant air quality levels (on the proposed development site and other portions of the relevant air sheds)will conform with existing federal, state and local air quality regulations and standards with and without any special design features,construction methods, operating policies or public or private improvements. viii. Description of area to be impacted. A geographic description of the area expected to be most significantly impacted by air pollutants generated on the proposed development site or generated by increased transportation and other activities related to its development and use. Z78 do q. Geologic report. A report evaluating geologic and soils conditions, including: 1. Potential geologic hazards. A site specific analysis of the geologic characteristics on,or in the vicinity of, the site that could have a significant impact on the proposed development shall be conducted. It shall be prepared by a geologist or engineer who is qualified to map and evaluate geologic hazards and to assess their potential impacts on the development. It shall discuss any recent activity associated with the geologic hazards and shall provide an expert opinion as to the degree of severity of the potential geologic hazards. It shall also include recommendations as to how the development will avoid or mitigate any dangers posed to life or property from these hazards. ii. Soils study. A study prepared by a qualified professional describing existing surface and sub-surface soil characteristics on the site,and evaluating the suitability of such soils for the planned construction. r. Brush Creek impact report. A site specific analysis shall be prepared for lands within the boundaries of the Brush Creek Impact Area, and for lands located outside of the Brush Creek Impact Area whose development is determined to have the potential to impact Brush Creek and its associated riparian habitat. The analysis shall be prepared to comply with the provisions of Section 16A-4-30(d), Brush Creek Impact Report. S. Wildlife habitat analysis. A site specific analysis shall be prepared for lands designated as sensitive wildlife habitat on the Environmental Sensitivity Map in the Comprehensive Plan and for lands not so designated on the map that are determined to be sensitive wildlife habitat. The analysis shall be prepared to comply with the provisions of Section 16A-4-20(d),Wildlife Habitat Analysis. t. Construction management plan. A detailed construction management plan describing development phasing, construction schedules and measures for mitigating impacts associated with all aspects of the project. (Ord.4-1998 §1) (d) Staff review. Staff review of the application shall be accomplished, as specified in Section 16A-5-50, Staff Review of Application. Staff shall then meet with the applicant to provide preliminary comments,discuss issues and concerns,request additional information necessary to adequately evaluate the proposal and make recommendations regarding the application. The applicant will then have the opportunity to amend their application or provide additional information in response to the staff comments. Upon receipt of the requested information, or within ten(10)days of the staff meeting, whichever occurs first, a public notice that the Planning Commission will hold a hearing to consider the application shall be given by publication,mailing and posting of notice,pursuant to Section 16A-5-60(b), Manner and Timing of Notice. A complete TC Ord.00-15 Page 71 copy of the application shall be forwarded to the Commission, together with a copy of the staff review. (e) Planning Commission public hearing. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing to consider the application. The public hearing shall be conducted pursuant to Section 16A-5-70(b), Conduct of Public Hearing. The Planning Commission shall consider: all relevant materials and testimony; whether the application complies with Section 16A-5-300(c),General Restrictions, and Section 16A-5-310,Review Standards; and,when applicable,whether the preliminary plan has responded to the direction given by the Town concerning the sketch plan. Following closure of the hearing,the Planning Commission shall,by resolution,recommend to the Town Council that the application either be approved,approved with conditions or denied. (f) Public notice. Public notice that the Town Council will hold a hearing to consider the application shall be given by publication,mailing and posting of notice,pursuant to Section 16A-5-60(b),Manner and Timing of Notice. A complete copy of the application shall be forwarded to the Town Council,together with a copy of the staff review and a copy of the Planning Commission's recommendation. (g) Town Council public hearing. The Town Council shall hold a public hearing to consider the application. The public hearing shall be conducted pursuant to Section 16A-5-70(b), Conduct of Public Hearing. The Town Council shall consider: all relevant materials and testimony; the Planning Commission's recommendation; whether the application complies with Section 16A-5-300(c),General Restrictions, and Section 16A-5-310,Review Standards; and, as applicable, whether the preliminary plan has responded to the direction given by the Town concerning the sketch plan. Following closure of the hearing,the Town Council shall,by resolution, either approve, approve with conditions or deny the application. If the Town Council approves the preliminary plan, it may require, as a condition of that approval,that the final plan be reviewed by the Planning Commission before it is reviewed by the Town Council. The Planning Commission's review of the final plan shall be accomplished pursuant to Section 16A- 5-360(4), Planning Commission Review. (h) Amendment. If an applicant wishes to amend a submission after a Planning Commission recommendation thereon, such request shall be made in writing and presented to the Town Council during the public hearing. The Town Council shall consider and make a determination as to whether the changes alter the nature of the project from that described in the original submission to such an extent that: 1. The amendment should not be allowed; it. The amendment should be allowed,but the Planning Commission should have an opportunity to review the amendment and make a recommendation thereon; or in. The amendment should be allowed and the application should proceed without additional hearings or consideration thereof. If the amendment is not allowed,the Town Council shall continue to consider the application without the amendment in _g6 00 TC Ord.00-15 Page 72 accordance with the provisions of this Section. If an additional Planning Commission recommendation is to be made,the Town Council may, at their discretion,table the application until it has received the Planning Commission's recommendation on the amendment. (1) Remand. An application may also be remanded to the Planning Commission when the Town Council determines that the application has otherwise been altered in a significant manner following the Planning Commission's action on the preliminary PUD. The Town Council shall table the application until it has received the Planning Commission's recommendation on the changes. (j) Effect of preliminary plan approval. Approval of the preliminary plan shall not constitute approval of a PUD, or permission to proceed with construction of any aspect of the development. Such action shall only constitute authorization for the applicant to prepare and submit a final PUD, in accordance with the representations made by the applicant and any conditions applied by the Town upon the preliminary plan approval. (k) Expiration. The applicant shall be required to submit the final plan application within twelve (12)months after the date of preliminary plan approval. Failure to submit the application within this time period shall render the preliminary plan null and void, and require the applicant to submit a new sketch plan for review by the Town. The Town Council may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant an extension of the deadline to submit a final plan application, provided that the applicant requests such an extension in writing no less than thirty (30)days prior to such lapse lapse and said extension is approved by at least three-quarters(3/4)of the Town Council members of the Town Council present and voting. TC Ord.00-15 Page 73 FIGURE 5-4 PRELIMINARY PUD APPLICATION PROCEDURES PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE (OPnONAL) SUBMIT APPLICATION STAFF PUBLIC REVIEW NOTICE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NOTICE TOWN COUNCIL PUBLIC OUNCIL TOWN COUNCIL ACTION (Ord. 4-1998 §1) See. 16A-5-360. Final plan. (a) Purpose. The purpose of final plan review is for the applicant to provide the Town with documentation of how the PUD will comply with all of the representations made during the application process,and will address all issues or concerns raised during that process. This documentation shall include a final development plan, a guarantee of public improvements and covenants, as applicable. The final development plan shall specify the zone district limitations and development regulations that will guide the future development of the property. This may be referred to as the "PUD Guide." (b) Final Plan Review Intent and Issues.The questions the Planning Commission(if required) and Town Council should fully resolve during review of the final plan (depending upon the size and complexity of the proposal) include the following: (1) Response to preliminary plan conditions. Has the applicant provided detailed, sufficient and appropriate responses to each of the conditions identified applied rQ sm TC Ord.00-15 Page 74 to the preliminary plan? (2) Agreements and guarantees. Has the applicant submitted an adequate subdivision improvements agreement and pledge of security to guarantee the performance of any public improvements required by the Town? (3) Other plans and documents. Has the applicant submitted such other documents (final development plan, final landscaping plan, final grading plan, final utility plan and final architectural plan)that set out the specifications for all relevant features of the development proposal? Has a final version of the homeowner's association or condominium association documents or covenants been submitted, describing how the association will maintain any common open space? (c) Final Plan Review. The following procedures shall apply to an application for review of a final PUD plan. These procedures are illustrated in Figure 5-5,Final PUD Application Procedures. (1) Pre-application conference. Attendance at a pre-application conference is optional, but recommended,prior to submission of an application for final PUD plan review. (2) Submission of application. The applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Director that contains the following materials: a. Minimum contents. The minimum contents for any application, as specified in Section 16A-5-40(b),Minimum Contents. b. Final plat. A final subdivision plat that conforms to the specification of Section 16A-5-280(d)(3), Plat. C. Other drawings. Final versions of such other drawings as may be required to document the approved final PUD plan, such as the final development plan, final landscaping/grading plan, final architectural plan and final utility plan. The final development plan shall specify the zone district limitations and development regulations that will guide the future development of the property. This may be referred to as the "PUD Guide." d. Covenants. A final version of the homeowner's association or condominium association documents or covenants,as applicable, describing how the association will maintain any common open space. e. Guarantee of public improvements. i. Applicant is responsible for public improvements. The applicant shall be responsible for constructing or providing 000,93 00 TC Ord.00-15 Page 75 public improvements that are necessary for the development. The applicant shall also be responsible for submitting a guarantee for said improvements, in a form and amount satisfactory to the Town, as a condition precedent to any final PUD or subdivision approval. ii. Required public improvements. Required public improvements include: permanent survey monuments,range points and lot pins; paved streets; curbs, gutters, sidewalks,trails and other pedestrian ways;paved alleys; traffic-control signs, signals or devices; street lights; street name signs in accordance with Town design standards; water lines and fire hydrants; bridges or culverts; storm drainage improvements and storm sewers; sanitary sewers; electrical lines; telephone lines; natural gas lines; and landscaping. In the event that additional improvements or items are required,they shall also be guaranteed in the manner provided below. iii. Subdivision improvements agreement. The guarantee of public improvements shall be in the form of a written subdivision improvements agreement and pledge of security for performance of such agreement. The subdivision improvements agreement shall obligate the applicant to make and install,according to a specific schedule, any improvements required by the Town. 1. Security. The applicant shall secure the faithful and diligent performance of its obligations under such agreement with a pledge of security sufficient to provide a reasonable guaranty of not less than one hundred percent(100%)of the current estimated cost of the improvements described in the agreement, which estimate shall be approved by the Town Engineer. 2. Form of security. The pledge of security may, at the option of the Town, be in the form of a mortgage on real property,cash escrow, security bond, irrevocable letter of credit from a financially responsible lending institution, adequate construction loan commitment on which the Town is permitted to draw, evidence of fully prepaid construction contracts,or any combination of the above satisfactory to the Town; provided that the Town shall have the unconditional and irrevocable right upon default by the applicant to withdraw or acquire funds upon demand to partially or fully complete and/or pay for any improvements. In no case shall the Town be obligated,pursuant to any subdivision improvements OW TC Ord.00-15 Page 76 agreement,to complete any improvements due to the applicant's default if the security should be determined inadequate. 3. Agreement to repair. The subdivision improvements agreement shall contain language by which the applicant agrees to repair any existing improvements damaged during construction and such other items as the Town Council deems appropriate. 4. Partial release of security. The subdivision improvements agreement may provide for the partial release of security as portions of the improvements are completed,provided that no such partial or final release shall be granted until the improvements guaranteed have been inspected and accepted by the Town Engineer and a report of such inspection and acceptance is filed with the Planning Director. The Town Council shall release the amount held for the completed items. The agreement shall make provisions for the Town to retain an appropriate amount in the event of partial releases. 5. Recording. The agreement and pledge of security shall be recorded in the records of the County Clerk and Recorder together with the final plat. iv. Warranty. The applicant shall warrant the quality, workmanship and function of all improvements dedicated to the Town, the public or a utility for a period of two (2)years, or until July 1 of the year during which the second winter terminates after acceptance by the Town, whichever is greater. V. Default. In the event of default by the applicant, under the terms of any subdivision improvement agreement,no building permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued within the subdivision until the default is corrected. (Ord.4-1998 §1) (3) Staff review. Staff review of the application shall be accomplished, as specified in Section 16A-5-50, Staff Review of Application. Staff shall then meet with the applicant to provide preliminary comments, discuss issues and concerns,request additional information necessary to adequately evaluate the proposal and make recommendations regarding the application. The applicant will then have the opportunity to amend their application or provide additional information in response to the staff comments. Upon receipt of the requested information, or within ten(10)days of the staff meeting,whichever occurs first, the Planning Commission and/or Town Council meeting(s) shall be scheduled by the Planning Director. ss aw TC Ord.00-15 Page 77 (4) Planning Commission review. If, as a condition of its preliminary plan approval, the Town Council has required that the final plan be reviewed by the Planning Commission,then a complete copy of the application shall be forwarded to the Planning Commission,together with a copy of the staff review. The Planning Commission shall consider: all relevant materials and testimony; whether the application complies with Section 16A-5-300(c), General Restrictions,and Section 16A-5-310,Review Standards; and whether the final plan is consistent with the approved preliminary plan, and shall,by resolution,recommend that the Town Council approve, approve with conditions or deny the application. (5) Town Council action. A complete copy of the application shall be forwarded to the Town Council, together with a copy of the staff review. The Town Council shall consider: all relevant materials and testimony; whether the application complies with Section 16A-5-300(c), General Restrictions, and Section 16A-5- 310, Review Standards; whether the final plan is consistent with the approved preliminary plan; and,when applicable,the Planning Commission's recommendations, and shall,by resolution, approve,approve with conditions or deny the application. (6) Effect of final PUD approval. Approval of the final PUD plan shall confer upon the owner of all or a portion of such property the right to apply for a building permit for development that is consistent with the limitations, restrictions, conditions and parameters set forth in the final PUD plan. Following recording of the final plat,the applicant shall be authorized to convey individual ownership interests. Final PUD plan approval shall remain in effect for a period of up to but not more than three(3)years,unless the time frame is extended by the Town Council. (7) Recording of final plan. Within ninety (90)days of the date of approval of the final PUD plan,the applicant shall submit three(3)Mylar copies of the final plan to the Planning Director,together with any other documents that are to be recorded. The final PUD plan maps and plat shall also be submitted in a digital form acceptable to the Planning Director, for incorporation in the Town's geographic information system(GIS). a. Planning Director review. The Planning Director shall review the documents to ensure they comply with the terms and conditions of approval, shall obtain signatures for all of the applicable certificates on the final plan and shall return the documents to the applicant. b. Recording by applicant. The applicant shall thereafter cause the documents to be recorded in the records of the County Clerk and Recorder, at the applicant's expense. OOM &000 - TC Ord.00-15 Page 78 FIGURE 5-5 FINAL PUD APPLICATION PROCEDURES PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE (OPTIONAL) SUBMIT APPLICATION STAFF REVIEW PU1N.COMM. ACTION (IF REQUIRED) TOWN COUNCIL ACTION (Ord. 4-1998 §1) Sec. 16A-5-380. Enforcement of approved PUD plan. (a) Provisions run in favor of Town. To further the mutual interests of the residents, occupants and owners of a PUD, and of the public in the preservation of the integrity of the final PUD plan,the provisions of the plan relating to the use of land and the location of common open space shall run in favor of the Town and shall be enforceable at law or in equity by the Town without limitation on any power or regulation otherwise granted by law. (b) Provisions run in favor of residents. All provisions of the final PUD plan shall run in favor of the residents,occupants and owners of the planned unit development, but only to the extent expressly provided in the plan and in accordance with its terms and, to the extent, said provisions,whether recorded by plat, covenant,easement or owners acting individually,jointly or through an organization designated in the plan to act in their behalf. However,no provisions of the plan shall be implied to exist in favor of residents, occupants and owners except as to those portions which have been finally approved. (c) Rights to maintain and enforce remain in effect. No modification,removal or release of 197 00 TC Ord.00-15 Page 79 the provisions of the final plan by the Town,pursuant to the provisions of this Code, shall affect the rights of residents, occupants and owners of the PUD to maintain and enforce those provisions at law or in equity, subject to the limitations contained in the plan and Subsection(b),Provisions Run in Favor of Residents. (Ord. 4-1998 §1) Sec. 16A-5-390. Amendment of final PUD. An applicant may amend an approved final PUD by complying with the following procedures and standards. (1) Overview of amendment procedures. There are three(34 types of amendments that an applicant may propose to a PUD. The applicable procedures for each type of amendment are as follows: a. Administrative amendment. An administrative amendment to an approved PUD may be considered pursuant to Section 16A-5-250, Administrative Modifications. b. Minor amendment. A minor amendment to an approved PUD shall comply with the procedures of Subsection(2),Procedures for Minor Amendment of Final PUD, and with the standards of Subsection(3), Review Standards. C. Major amendment. A major amendment that would substantially modify all or a part of an approved PUD, or any amendment to an approved PUD that does not comply with the provisions of Subsection (3),Review Standards, shall require a full PUD process. During the full PUD process, the Town shall determine whether the application complies with the standards of Section 16A-5-300(c), General Restrictions, and Section 16A-5-310, Review Standards, and shall also consider(but not be bound by)whether the application complies with the standards of Subsection (3), Review Standards. (2) Procedures for minor amendment of final PUD. a. Pre-application conference. Attendance at a pre-application conference is mandatory prior to submission of an application for a minor amendment to a final PUD. b. Submission of application. The applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Director that contains the following materials: i. Minimum contents. The minimum contents for any application, as specified in Section 16A-5-40(b), Minimum Contents. ii. Written statement. A written statement describing those TC Ord.00-15 Page 80 elements of the original PUD that are proposed to be modified. iii. Other information. The applicant shall submit such other written or graphic information as is necessary to describe and evaluate the proposed amendment, such as revised building elevations, or a marked-up copy of the final development plan. iv. Amendment of PUD approved under prior code. An applicant proposing to amend a PUD approved prior to the effective date of this Development Code shall, as part of the application, propose any other amendments that are necessary to make the PUD conform with the provisions of this Division 3, Planned Unit Development. a. Staff review. Staff review of the application shall be accomplished, as specified in Section 16A-5-50, Staff Review of Application. b. Action by Planning Commission. A complete copy of the application shall be forwarded to the Planning Commission, together with a copy of the staff review. The Planning Commission shall review the application, considering the standards of Subsection(3),Review Standards, and shall make its recommendations to the Town Council. C. Public hearing. Public notice that the Town Council will consider the application shall be given by publication,posting and mailing of notice, pursuant to Section 16A-5-60(b),Manner and Timing of Notice. The Town Council shall hold a public hearing to consider the application. The public hearing shall be conducted pursuant to Section 16A-5-70(b), Conduct of Public Hearing. A complete copy of the application shall be forwarded to the Town Council, together with a copy of the staff review. The Town Council shall consider all relevant materials and testimony, shall consider the standards of Section 16A-5-390(3), Review Standards, and shall,by ordinance, approve, approve with conditions or deny the application. d. Recording of amended plan. Within ninety(90)days of the date of approval of the amendment, the applicant shall submit three(3)Mylar copies, suitable for recording,of the amended plan to the Planning Director,together with any other documents that are to be recorded. The Planning Director shall review the documents to ensure that they comply with the terms and conditions of approval, shall obtain signatures for all of the applicable certificates on the amended plan and shall return the documents to the applicant. The applicant shall record the documents in the records of the County Clerk and Recorder, at the applicant's expense. The final amended plan maps shall also be submitted in a digital form acceptable to the Planning Director, for incorporation in the Town's geographic information system(GIS). fop 11 TC Ord.00-15 Page 81 (3) Review standards. An application for a minor amendment to a final PUD shall comply with the following standards: a. Consistent with original PUD. The proposed amendment shall be consistent with, or an enhancement of, the original PUD approval. b. No substantially adverse impact. The proposed amendment shall not have a substantially adverse effect on the neighborhood surrounding the land where the amendment is proposed, or have a substantially adverse impact on the enjoyment of land abutting upon or across the street from the subject property. C. Not change character. The proposed amendment shall not change the basic character of the PUD or surrounding areas. d. Comply with other applicable standards. The proposed amendment shall comply with the other applicable standards of this Division 3, Planned Unit Development, including but not limited to Section 16A-5- 300(c),General Restrictions, and Section 16A-5-310,Review Standards. (Ord. 4-1998 §1; Ord. 13-1998 §1; Ord. 1-1999 §1; Ord. 6-1999 §1) Division 4. Subdivision Regulations Sec. 16A-5-400. Applicability. This Section shall apply to the subdivision of all land in the Town,unless exempted pursuant to Article V,Division 5, Subdivision Exemptions. (Ord.4-1998 §1) Sec. 16A-5-410. General prohibitions. (a) No land shall be transferred,conveyed,sold or subdivided. No lot or parcel of land,nor any interest therein,shall be transferred,conveyed,sold,subdivided or acquired either in whole or in part, so as to create a new nonconforming use or to avoid, circumvent or subvert any provision of this Section,or the provisions or any final PUD plan. (b) No lot line shall be altered. No structure shall be constructed,nor building permit issued for a structure,on any parcel of land within a subdivision approved pursuant to this Section except where such structure is to be constructed upon a lot separately designated on the plat of such approved subdivision. The lot lines established in such approved subdivision shall not be altered by conveyance of a part of any lot,nor shall any part of any lot be joined with a part of any other lot for conveyance or construction without approval of the Town Council as a subdivision or subdivision exemption. (c) No dwelling unit shall be occupied. No dwelling unit shall be occupied or used in violation of any of the provisions of this Section. (d) Action in event of violation. doo Ordinance 15, Series of 2000 Page 82 (1) Action to enjoin. The Town Council shall have the power to bring an action to enjoin any subdivider from selling or otherwise conveying,before full compliance with the provisions of this Section,any parcel of land or other interest,which activity would constitute a subdivision. (2) Permits shall not issue. The Building Official shall not issue permits of any kind for the construction of any building or other improvements upon any land for which an approved final plat is required, unless and until the requirements of this Section have been complied with. (3) Town Council may withdraw approval. The Town Council may withdraw any approval of a plat if and when it is determined that information provided by the subdivider in the application upon which such decision was based is false,materially inaccurate,or the subdivider has failed to comply with the terms of the approval,or with the provisions of Section 16A-5-420(7),Recording of Final Plat. The Town Council shall cause written notice to be served upon the subdivider or his or her agents,directing the subdivider to appear at a certain time and place for a hearing before the Town Council not less than thirty(30)nor more than sixty(60)days after the date of service of such notice. At the hearing,the allegations shall be examined by the Town Council,which shall have the power,upon good cause being shown,to withdraw any previous approval or to require such corrective or additional measures to be taken by the subdivider as are found to be proper. (Ord.4-1998 §1) Sec. 16A-5-420. Procedure. The following procedures shall apply to a subdivision application. These procedures are illustrated in Figure 5-10, Subdivision Application Procedures. (1) Pre-application conference. Attendance at a pre-application conference is mandatory prior to submission of a subdivision application. (2) Submission of application. The applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Director that contains those materials specified in Section 16A-5-430,Application Contents. (3) Staff review. Staff review of the application shall be accomplished,as specified in Section 16A-5-50,Staff Review of Application. A complete copy of the application shall be forwarded to the Planning Commission,together with a copy of the staff review. (4) Planning Commission review. The Planning Commission shall consider the application. The Planning Commission shall consider all relevant materials and testimony, and whether the application complies with Section 16A-5-440, Review Standards, and shall recommend to the Town Council that the application either be approved, approved with conditions or denied. (5) Public notice. Public notice that the Town Council will hold a hearing to consider the application shall be given by publication,mailing and posting of notice,pursuant to Section 16A-5- 60(b),Manner and Timing of Notice. A complete copy of the application shall be forwarded to the Town Council,together with the staff review and the Planning Commission recommendation. (6) Town Council public hearing. The Town Council shall hold a public hearing to consider the application. The public hearing shall be conducted pursuant to Section 16A-5-70(b),Conduct of Public Hearing. The Town Council shall consider all relevant materials and testimony, the Planning Commission's recommendation and whether the application complies with Section 16A-5- 440,Review Standards. Following closure of the hearing,the Town Council shall,by resolution, either approve, approve with conditions or deny the application. OP Ordinance 15, Series of 2000 Page 83 (7) Recording of final plat. Within ninety(90)days of the date of approval of the subdivision, the applicant shall submit three(3)Mylar copies of a final plat to the Planning Director. The final plat shall also be submitted in a digital form acceptable to the Community Development Department, for incorporation in the Town's geographic information system(GIS). a. Planning Director review. The Planning Director shall review the final plat to ensure it complies with the terms and conditions of approval, shall obtain signatures for all of the applicable certificates on the plat and shall return the exemption plat to the applicant. b. Recording by applicant. The applicant shall thereafter cause the final plat to be recorded in the records of the County Clerk and Recorder,at the applicant's expense. (8) Effect of final plat approval. Recording of the final plat shall confer upon the applicant the right to establish individual ownership interests, according to the final plat, within the area defined in said final approval,subject to any conditions imposed as part of the final approval and subject to the provisions of this Development Code,and any other applicable municipal ordinances and regulations. (9) Consolidation with PUD review. If the application requests both subdivision and planned unit development approval,then in lieu of the above procedures,the subdivision application shall be considered at the same time and following the same procedures as preliminary PUD plan review by the Planning Commission and final PUD plan review by the Town Council. sow Ordinance 15, Series of 2000 Page 84 FIGURE 5.10 SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROCEDURES cc CONFERENCE (MANDATORY) SUBMIT APPLICATION STAFF REVIEW PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PUBLIC NOTICE TOWN COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING I � TOWN COUNCIL ACTION (Ord.4-1998 §1) Sec. 16A-5-430. Application contents. An application for subdivision shall include the following information: (1) Minimum contents. The minimum contents for any application,as specified in Section 16A-5-40(b),Minimum Contents. (2) Improvements survey. An improvements survey,showing the location and dimensions of all existing structures, streets, alleys, easements, drainage areas, irrigation ditches, public and private utilities and other significant features within the proposed subdivision. (3) Plat. A proposed subdivision plat,which shall have accurate dimensions for all lines, angles and curves used to describe boundaries,streets,setbacks,alleys and easements. Areas to be reserved or dedicated for public or common use or other important features shall be shown with appropriate dimensions. All curves shall be circular arcs and shall be defined by the radius,central angle, tangent, arc and chord distances. All dimensions, both linear and angular, are to be ow-11; 00 Ordinance 15, Series of 2000 Page 85 determined by an accurate control survey on the field which must balance and close within a limit of one(1)in ten thousand(10,000). The plat shall depict the following information: a. Lots,blocks and streets. A systematic identification of all lots and blocks and names for all streets. b. Adjoining subdivisions. Names of all immediately adjoining subdivisions with dotted lines of abutting lots. If adjoining land is unplatted,it shall be shown as such. c. Public areas and facilities. An identification of the streets,alleys,parks and other public areas or facilities as shown on the plat,and a dedication thereof to the public use,when required. An identification of the easements as shown on the plat and a grant thereof to those persons identified on the plat. Areas reserved for future public acquisition shall also be shown on the plat. d. Survey description. A written survey description of the area,including the total acreage and a description of areas to be dedicated. e. Survey monuments. A description of all survey monuments,both found and set,which mark boundaries of the subdivision,and a description of all monuments used in conducting the survey. The Colorado Coordinate System may be used. f. Surveyor's certificates. A certificate of a registered land surveyor explaining how bearings, if used, were determined. A certificate by the registered land surveyor as to the accuracy of the survey and plat, stating that the survey was performed by him or her in accordance with Title 38,Article 51,C.R.S. g. Certificate by attorney or title insurer. A certificate by an attorney admitted to practice in the State,or corporate title insurer,that the person or persons dedicating the public rights-of- way,areas or facilities as shown thereon are the owners thereof in fee simple,free and clear of all liens and encumbrances that would adversely affect the intended use of the property to which dedications are made to the public. h. Town signature blocks. Certificates providing for"Approval as to Form"by the Town Attorney and"Approval as to Content"by the Planning Director and a certificate providing for approval of the plat and acceptance of dedications and easements by the Town Council,with signature by the Mayor and attestation by the Town Clerk. i. Clerk and Recorder's Certificate. A certificate of recording for the County Clerk and Recorder. (4) Additional material. The application shall also contain the following material: a. Engineering plans. Complete engineering plans and specifications for all public improvements on- and off-site, including roads, trails, bridges and storm drainage improvements. Plans and specifications for improvements to be designed and constructed by special districts or utility companies shall not be required. b. Landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan showing locations,size and type of landscape features and planting schedule. Ordinance 15, Series of 2000 Page 86 c. Monument records. Copies of any monument records required of the land surveyor in accordance with Title 38,Article 53,C.R.S. d. Agreements. Any agreements with utility or ditch companies,when applicable. (Ord.4- 1998 §1) See. 16A-5-440. Review standards. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the following review standards. (1) Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision shall be consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. (2) Compatibility with surrounding land uses. The proposed subdivision shall be compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. (3) Comply with other applicable provisions. The proposed subdivision shall comply with all other applicable provisions of this Development Code,including,but not limited to,the applicable standards of Article III,Zone Districts,and Article IV,Development Evaluation Standards. (4) Suitability for development. The property proposed to be subdivided shall be suitable for development, considering its topography,environmental features and any natural or man-made hazards that may affect its development potential. (5) Adequate facilities. The applicant shall show that: (a)adequate facilities will be provided to the proposed subdivision for water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection, roads and pedestrian circulation;(b)the proposed subdivision has been located so as to be reasonably convenient in relation to police and fire protection, emergency medical services and schools; and(c) the proposed subdivision will accommodate the efficient provision of transit facilities and services. (6) Spatial pattern shall be efficient. The proposed subdivision shall be located so as not to create spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services,or that require duplication or premature extension of public facilities. a. Roads. Any new road developed to serve the proposed subdivision shall be continuous and in alignment with existing platted streets to which the street is to be connected. Where appropriate,new streets shall be planned so that they can create an interconnected Town road network, with provision for adequate road and utility easements. Where cul-de-sacs are incorporated in a subdivision,the applicant is encouraged to provide a trail or similar pedestrian link between them. b. Water and sewer lines. Any water or sewer line extension necessary to serve the proposed subdivision shall be consistent with the Snowmass Water and Sanitation District's service plan and with the Town's Comprehensive Plan. (7) Phasing. If the proposed subdivision is to be developed in phases,then each phase shall contain the required streets,utilities,landscaping and other improvements that are necessary and desirable for residents of the project. If the subdivision incorporates any amenities for the benefit of the Town,such as trail connections,these shall be constructed within the first phase of the project, 01K goo Ordinance 15, Series of 2000 Page 87 or, if this is not possible,then as early in the project as is reasonable. (Ord.4-1998 §1) Sec. 16A-5-450. Amendment of final plat. An applicant may amend an approved final subdivision plat by complying with the following procedures and standards. (1) Overview of amendment procedures. There are three(3)types of amendments that an applicant may propose to an approved subdivision. The applicable procedures for each type of amendment are as follows: a. Administrative amendment. An administrative amendment to an approved subdivision may be considered pursuant to Section 16A-5-250,Administrative Modifications. b. Minor amendment. A minor amendment to an approved subdivision shall comply with the procedures of Subsection(2),Procedures for Minor Amendment of Final Plat,and with the standards of Subsection(3), Review Standards. c. Major amendment. A major amendment that would substantially modify all or apart of an approved subdivision,or any amendment to an approved subdivision that does not comply with the provisions of Subsection (3), Review Standards, shall require a full subdivision process. During the full subdivision process, the Town shall determine whether the application complies with the standards of Section 16A-5-440,Review Standards,and shall also consider(but not be bound by)whether the application complies with the standards of Subsection(3),Review Standards. (2) Procedures for minor amendment of final plat. a. Pre-application conference. Attendance at a pre-application conference is mandatory prior to submission of an application for a minor amendment to a final plat. b. Submission of application. The applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Director that contains the following materials: 1. Minimum contents. The minimum contents for any application, as specified in Section 16A-5-40(b), Minimum Contents. 2. Written statement. A written statement describing those elements of the original subdivision approval that are proposed to be modified. 3. Other information. The applicant shall submit such other written or graphic information as is necessary to describe and evaluate the proposed amendment,such as a marked-up copy of the final plat. c. Staff review. Staff review of the application shall be accomplished, as specified in Section 16A-5-50, Staff Review of Application. d. Public notice. A complete copy of the application shall be forwarded to the Town Council,together with a copy of the staff review. Public notice that the Town Council will consider the application shall be given by publication, posting and mailing of notice, pursuant to Section 16A-5-60(b), Manner and Timing of Notice. OW%so Ordinance 15, Series of 2000 Page 88 e. Town Council action. The Town Council shall hold a public hearing to consider the application. The public hearing shall be conducted pursuant to Section 16A-5-70(b), Conduct of Public Hearing. The Town Council shall consider all relevant materials and testimony and the standards in Subsection(3),Review Standards,and shall,by resolution, approve, approve with conditions or deny the application. f. Recording of amended plat. Within ninety(90) days of the date of approval of the amendment,the applicant shall submit three(3)Mylar copies,suitable for recording,of the amended plat to the Planning Director, together with any other documents that are to be recorded. The Planning Director shall review the documents to ensure that they comply with the terms and conditions of approval, shall obtain signatures for all of the applicable certificates on the final plan and shall return the documents to the applicant. The applicant shall thereafter cause the documents to be recorded in the records of the County Clerk and Recorder, at the applicant's expense. (3) Review standards. An application for a minor amendment to a final plat shall comply with the following standards: a. Consistent with original subdivision. The proposed amendment shall be consistent with or an enhancement of the original subdivision approval. b. No substantially adverse impact. The proposed amendment shall not have a substantially adverse effect on the neighborhood surrounding the land where the amendment is proposed,or have a substantially adverse impact on the enjoyment of land abutting upon or across the street from the subject property. c. Not change character. The proposed amendment shall not change the basic character of the subdivision or surrounding areas. d. Comply with other applicable standards. The proposed amendment shall comply with the applicable standards for review of a subdivision application,as specified in Subsection (3), Review Standards. (Ord.4-1998 §1; Ord. 1-1999 §1) See. 16A-5-460. Vacation of recorded plat. Vacation of a recorded plat, or portion thereof, such as a public right-of-way or a dedicated easement,shall only be approved by the adoption of an ordinance by the Town Council. The following procedures shall apply to an application to vacate a recorded plat or portion thereof: (1) Pre-application conference. Attendance at a pre-application conference is optional,but recommended,prior to submission of an application to vacate a recorded plat or portion thereof. (2) Submission of application. The applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Director that contains the minimum contents for any application,as specified in Section 16A-5- 40(b),Minimum Contents,together with a copy of the recorded plat,indicating the portions of the plat proposed to be vacated. (3) Staffreview. Staff review of the application shall be accomplished,as specified in Section 16A-5-50,Staff Review of Application. A copy of the staffreview shall be forwarded to the Town Council,together with a complete copy of the application. r Ordinance 15, Series of 2000 Page 89 (4) Town Council action. Town Council action on the proposed vacation shall comply with the Town's procedures for adoption of an ordinance. The Town Council shall consider the following standards in determining whether to approve, approve with conditions or deny the application: a. Access to a public road. No roadway shall be vacated so as to leave any adjoining land without a means of access to another public road. b. Easements. When vacating a public road, the Town may reserve easements for the installation or maintenance of utilities, ditches and similar improvements. c. Transfers or sales of lots. A subdivision plat may be vacated if none of its lots have been sold or transferred, or if there have been sales or transfers,then if there has been no development on any lots in the subdivision and all of the owners agree to the vacation of the plat. d. Comprehensive Plan. The proposed vacation shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (5) Actions following approval. a. Documentation. The applicant shall record the documentation of the approved vacation in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder. The documentation shall also be submitted in a digital form acceptable to the Community Development Department,for incorporation in the Town's geographic information system(GIS). b. Quit claim deeds. Whenever the Town shall approve an application vacating a public right-of-way,abutting land owners shall be provided with a quit claim deed for the vacated lands. Each abutting land owner shall be deeded that portion of the vacated right-of-way to which the owner's land is nearest in proximity. (Ord.4-1998 §1) Division S. Subdivision Exemptions Sec. 16A-5-500. Exemptions authorized. The Town Council shall be authorized to exempt the following activities from the terms of the subdivision regulations: (1) Lot line adjustments. Lot line adjustments between previously platted lots. (2) Lot combinations. Lot combinations of platted lots. (3) Conveying title. Conveying title and/or fulfilling legal obligations when no development will result thereafter,without subdivision or PUD approval. (4) Condominiumization and timeshare. Condominiumization of a development,or approval of timeshare estates. (Ord.4-1998 §1) Sec. 16A-5-510. Review procedure. The following procedures shall apply to a subdivision exemption application. These procedures are it Ordinance 15, Series of 2000 Page 90 illustrated in Figure 5-9, Subdivision Exemption Application Procedures. (1) Pre-application conference. Attendance at a pre-application conference is optional,but recommended,prior to submission of an application for subdivision exemption. (2) Submission of application. The applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Director that contains those materials specified in Section 16A-5-520,Application Contents. (3) Staff review. Staff review of the application shall be accomplished,as specified in Section 16A-5-50, Staff Review of Application. (4) Town Council action. A complete copy of the application shall be forwarded to the Town Council,together with a copy of the staff review. The Town Council shall consider all relevant materials and testimony, shall consider whether the application complies with the standards in Section 16A-5-530,Review Standards,and shall,by resolution,approve,approve with conditions or deny the application. (5) Recording of exemption plat. Within ninety (90) days of the date of approval of the subdivision exemption,the applicant shall submit three(3)Mylar copies,suitable for recording,of an exemption plat to the Planning Director. The Planning Director shall review the exemption plat to ensure it complies with the terms and conditions of approval,shall obtain signatures for all of the applicable plat certificates and return the exemption plat to the applicant. The applicant shall thereafter cause the exemption plat to be recorded in the records of the County Clerk and Recorder,at the applicant's expense. FIGURE 5-9 SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION APPLICATION PROCEDURES PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE (OPTIONAL) SUBNR APPLICATION F� STAFF REVIEW TOWN COUNCIL ACTION (Ord.4-1998 §1) Sec. 16A-5-520. Application contents. An application for a subdivision exemption shall contain the following materials: (1) Minimum contents. The minimum contents for any application,as specified in Section 16A-5-40(b),Minimum Contents. (2) Improvements survey. An improvements survey,showing the location and dimensions of _q1 - Ordinance 15, Series of 2000 Page 91 all existing structures, streets, alleys, easements, drainage areas, irrigation ditches, public and private utilities and other significant features within the property. (3) Exemption plat. The applicant shall submit a proposed exemption plat, which shall contain the applicable information for a final plat, as specified in Section 16A-5-430(3), Application Contents. (4) Condominium documents. For an application for condominiumization,the applicant shall also submit proposed condominium documents,including condominium declaration,articles of condominium association,bylaws,maps and all other applicable information,including Secretary of State_disclosure statement as required by the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act, Section 38-33.3-101 et. seq.,C.R.S. The application shall also include a proposal for restricting owner usage and how the units will remain in the short-term rental market,if applicable. (Ord.4- 1998 §1) Sec. 16A-5-530. Review standards. An application for a subdivision exemption shall comply with the following standards: (1) Exemption is necessary. The exemption shall be necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights of the applicant. (2) Consistent with subdivision. The exemption shall be consistent with the preservation of the goals, objectives and standards of the particular subdivision or land area involved. (3) No new lots created. Granting of the exemption shall not create any new lots in any single-family subdivision. (4) Comply with Development Code. The exemption shall comply with the standards of the zoning district in which the property is located and all other applicable standards of this Development Code. With respect to an application for a lot line adjustment,if any of the lots or structures thereon are nonconforming prior to the adjustment,then no adjustment shall be allowed that increases the nonconformity of the lot or structure. (5) No adverse impacts. Granting of the exemption shall not be detrimental to the public welfare and shall not affect in a substantially adverse manner the enjoyment of land abutting upon or within the area in which the subject property is situated. (6) Not increase total allowable floor area. Granting of the exemption shall not increase the total allowable floor area on a lot or lots affected by the proposed exemption beyond the total allowed without the exemption,and any change in allowable floor area permitted by the exemption within those totals shall be consistent with the surrounding area. (7) Special circumstances. In the instance where the Town Council is unable to find that an application is consistent with any of the above standards,the exemption may only be granted if the Town Council finds that there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the subject property such that the strict application of these standards would result in undue hardship and deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the land. (Ord.4-1998 §1) �66 I Ordinance 15, Series of 2000 Page 92 bring old sWjQ4QF@S to Aill 99"URA90 With now Wilding gons4m6tion 90dor, (Qfd 4 1998 §14 Sec. 16A-5-550. Time share. (a) Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to make available a development technique that under controlled conditions and in certain circumstances may be of economic benefit to the community through increased investment and greater utilization of facilities. This is accomplished by: (1) Avoid problems. Setting high standards for time share projects to avoid the undesirable aspects that have been associated with these programs in other resort communities. Based on research of past experience with time share,special attention is directed to problems related to: (a) long-term maintenance,repair and replacement;(b)market and sales practices;(c)management arrangements; and(d)full disclosure provisions. (2) Consumer protection. Protecting the consumer,the interest of the public and the present character and ambience of the community are principal objectives of these regulations. (3) Innovation. Providing certainty that all appropriate innovative planning and development measures maybe utilized for the betterment of the Town with strong enforceable safeguards against abuse. (b) Applicability and authority. No time share estates shall be created with respect to any dwelling unit,hotel/lodge or suite unless the applicant therefore has complied with the requirements of this Section and the underl ing zone district. The objectives,standards,application contents and other provisions of this Section shall be applied to the review of any application which proposes or contemplates the creation and sale of time share estates,to the extent specifically provided herein. It is acknowledged that,depending upon the type of time share estate created and the manner in which it is sold, the ownership right in and to such estate, as evidenced by contract, license, membership or otherwise,maybe considered personal property understate law. Since the object of ownership and use is a dwelling unit or room which in and of itself is considered real property,the fact that the ownership right may be considered personalty(i.e.,for the purpose of imposition of sales tax),does not exempt the sale,exchange,rental,transfer or use of time share estate from this Section. For the purpose of this Section,an interest in a time share estate shall be considered an interest in real property. This Section is intended to supplement the provisions of the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act as applied in the Town by adding the right-to-use estate to the definition of a time share estate and by imposing the specific local review standards and requirements set forth herein. 2. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or application hereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid,the invalidity shall not affect any other provision or application of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application,and,to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. READ,APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Town Council of the Town of Snowmass Village on First Reading on September 25,2000 upon a motion by Council Member Mercatoris,the second of Council Member Costello,and upon a vote of 4 in favor and 1 against. Council Member Hatfield was opposed. READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED as amended, by the Town Council of the Town of _M so Ordinance 15, Series of 2000 Page 93 Snowmass Village on Second Reading on October 13, 2000 upon a motion by Council Member ,the second of Council Member and upon a vote of in favor and against. TOWN OF SNOWMASS VILLAGE T. Michael Manchester, Mayor ATTEST: Trudi Worline,Town Clerk _160 - TOWN OF SNOWMASS VILLAGE TOWN COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING WHEN: MONDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2000 WHERE: SNOWMASS VILLAGE TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 0016 KEARNS ROAD 2ND FLOOR SNOWMASS CENTER BUILDING WHY: TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON: ORDINANCE NO. 20, SERIES OF 2000, AN ORDINANCE GRANTING THE SNOWMASS VILLAGE HOUSING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONAL AUTHORIZATION TO COMMENCE CERTAIN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN PARCEL N, FARAWAY RANCH GROSS PARCEL PLAT TIME: AT A MEETING WHICH BEGINS AT 4 : 00 P.M. THE EXACT TIME OF THE HEARING WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE AGENDA. INFO: 923-3777 Trudi Worline, Town Clerk Posted and Publish @d in the Snowmass Sun on 10-11-2000 . http://www.tosv.com clerk @tosv.com COUNCIL COMMUNIQUE Meeting Date: October 16, 2000 Presented By: Planning Division Chris Conrad, Planning Director Subject: Second Reading: Ordinance No. 20, Series Of 2000, an ordinance granting the Snowmass Village Housing Department conditional authorization to commence certain construction activities within Parcel N, Faraway Ranch Gross Parcel Plat. Overview: The Snowmass Village Housing Department ("Applicant') has requested approval to commence certain construction activities within Parcel N, Faraway Ranch Gross Parcel Plat, prior to receiving Final PUD approval for the Parcel "N" Affordable Housing Preliminary PUD application. The work will be limited to: 1) creating an access road into the site; 2) installing safety and silt fencing; 3) the placement of interim erosion control measures; 4) the installation of the interceptor trench drain uphill of the proposed building locations as directed by the soils engineer; 5) grading the parking lot area as allowed by the soils engineer; and 6) preparing the site for winter. Staff Comments: First reading approval of the enclosed ordinance was granted on October 9, 2000 following the Preliminary PUD approval for the Parcel N Affordable Housing project. Staff Staff recommends second reading approval of the enclosed Recommendation: ordinance. H:\user\cconrad\MS Word Docs\TC 00-20 Parcel N Construction TCMemo02 _)ay . TOWN OF SNOWMASS VILLAGE TOWN COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 20 SERIES OF 2000 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING THE SNOWMASS VILLAGE HOUSING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONAL AUTHORIZATION TO COMMENCE CERTAIN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN PARCEL N, FARAWAY RANCH GROSS PARCEL PLAT. WHEREAS, the Snowmass Village Housing Department (the "Applicant") has requested authorization from the Town of Snowmass Village (the "Town") to commence certain construction activities within Parcel N, Faraway Ranch Gross Parcel Plat; and WHEREAS, the construction activities involve what would be the initial site development phase of the Parcel "N" Affordable Housing project (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, said work will be limited to: 1) creating an access road into the site; 2) installing safety and silt fencing; 3) the placement of interim erosion control measures; 4) the installation of the interceptor trench drain uphill of the proposed building locations as directed by the soils engineer; 5) grading the parking lot area as allowed by the soils engineer; and 6) preparing the site for winter; and WHEREAS, Town Council Resolution No. 25, Series of 2000, which was adopted on October 9, 2000, concerned the Parcel "N" Affordable Housing project Preliminary PUD and granted authorization for the Applicant to prepare and submit the final architectural, civil, and site drawings that are customarily included as part of the Final PUD application; and WHEREAS, during the course of the Preliminary PUD review process the Applicant and Town Council discussed the various geotechnical and ground water issues relating to the project site and the advantages of being able to commence installation of the interceptor trench drain as soon as possible before the winter ground freeze and commencement of the spring run-off; and WHEREAS, the subject interceptor trench drain and other construction activities described above are consistent with the Project's Preliminary PUD development proposal; and WHEREAS, it was generally found that the subject drain system, if properly designed and constructed, would aid in the stabilization of the hillside oow-)C6 g Ordinance No.20,Series of 2000 Page 2 and could be installed independent of the other improvements proposed as part of the Project PUD; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance only concerns granting authorization for the Applicant to commence the specific construction activities listed above prior to receiving any Final PUD approval; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the adoption of this Ordinance is necessary for the immediate protection of the public health, safety and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF SNOWMASS VILLAGE, COLORADO, as follows: Section One: Findings: In consideration of the Applicant's request, the Town Council finds as follows: 1. The geotechnical studies submitted during the Preliminary PUD process have considered on-site and neighboring property conditions. The Engineer's Opinion describes the Applicant's design considerations and construction techniques that will be incorporated within the interceptor trench drain system to ensure that said work will occur and the improvements will be placed in a manner that will not cause greater slope instability or increase the potential for slope failure of the surrounding hillside. 2. It is the responsibility of the Applicant's professional engineers and contractors to design and construct the proposed system such that there will be no significant risk that damage to adjacent property will result from the proposed trench drain installation. 3. The Town Council finds, based upon the information provided and Applicant's representations, that the interceptor trench drain, if properly designed and constructed under strict supervision of the geotechnical engineers, reflect generally accepted engineering, civil and/or structural design practices and standards which could be expected to be reasonably effective in mitigating the risk of damage to adjacent property. 4. The Town Council finds, based upon the information provided and Applicant's representations, that the proposed construction activity and '0• Ordinance No.20,Series of 2000 Page 3 improvements, if properly designed and constructed under strict supervision of the geotechnical engineers, would not cause greater slope instability, increase the potential for slope failure or present a significant risk that damage to adjacent property will result from the proposed construction. 5. The Town Council does find that it is desirable to commence this construction of the de-watering facilities prior to the Spring run-off and onset of the rising water tables. They further find that sufficient understanding has been gained during the Preliminary PUD review and in reviewing the submission documents to allow the Applicant to make permit application for the subject construction activities in order to commence development prior to their Final PUD to the extent authorized pursuant to any building permit approval that may be granted by the Town Community Development Department. 6. Recognizing the significance of the construction activity proposed and that the work is of a nature and scale that is beyond the scope of the Town's typical building permit inspection program, the Town Council finds that a project of this type should have some form of specialty inspection and reporting mechanism occurring during the course of construction. 7. Any such permit so issued may only be exercised at the Applicant's own risk. Section Two: Authorization. The Town Council hereby authorizes the Applicant to submit and the Community Development Department to accept for review a building permit application for certain construction activities within Parcel N, Faraway Ranch Gross Parcel Plat. Said application involves: 1) creating an access road into the site; 2) installing safety and silt fencing; 3) the placement of interim erosion control measures; 4) the installation of the interceptor trench drain uphill of the proposed building locations as directed by the soils engineer; 5) grading the parking lot area as allowed by the soils engineer; and 6) generally preparing the site for winter. Further, the authorization granted shall be subject to the conditions specified within Section Three below. Section Three: Conditions of Authorization. 1. No construction activities, including the drainage trench system Owl/ 00 Ordinance No.20,Series of 2000 Page 4 installation, may occur until such time as the necessary Town permits have been reviewed, approved and issued by the appropriate Town departments. The Applicant and/or landowner shall be responsible for completion of the permitted work within the specified time-frame and to satisfy all other terms and conditions of any Town permits issued. 2. The Applicant shall provide a construction management plan specific to the work described within this ordinance for review and approval by the Planning Director. During the ski season, trucks will not be operating except between the hours of 9:00 am and 3:00 pm. All heavy equipment will be limited to no earlier than 7:30 am for warm-up and may not commence operations before 8:00 am. 3. Construction and/or project management issues may arise or problems may occur during construction that could not have been reasonably anticipated at the time the permits are issued or that are not sufficiently addressed within the Applicant's Construction Management Plan. The Planning Director shall have the authority to amend the Construction Management Plan as reasonably necessary to resolve the issue or problem. 4. The proposed work is customarily reviewed by the Town Council during the Final PUD process and conditions are specified within the final ordinance. Staff may include the conditions of this ordinance, by reference, as part of the building permit issued such that violation of the terms and conditions of this ordinance shall also be enforceable pursuant to Chapter 18 of the Municipal Code. Additional conditions may also be included as necessary to ensure compliance with all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. Should disagreements occur or issues arise that cannot be resolved at the staff level, the Applicant may then appeal the matter to the Town Council for final resolution. Said appeal shall be submitted in writing to the Community Development Department within five (5) days of the planning or community development director's decision. 5. The building permit application shall include some form of specialty inspection and reporting mechanism which ensures necessary oversight during the course of construction. The final proposal shall specify: 1) the manner in which the inspections will be conducted; 2) who will be conducting the inspections; and 3) how the Applicant will submit reasonable and necessary reports as may be required during I � ' r Ordinance No.20,Series of 2000 Page 5 construction by the Town Building Official or Planning Director. The final necessary inspection and reporting procedures shall be established by the Town Building Official or Planning Director following review of the permit application and shall be a condition of the permit being issued. Section Four: Severabiiity. If any provision of this Ordinance or application hereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity shall not affect any other provision or application of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Town Council of the Town of Snowmass Village on First Reading on October 9, 2000 upon a motion by Council Member Costello, the second of Council Member Mercatoris, and upon a vote of 4 in favor and 0 against. Council Member Brady was absent. READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Town Council of the Town of Snowmass Village on Second Reading on October 16, 2000 upon a motion by Council Member , the second of Council Member and upon a vote of in favor and against. TOWN OF SNOWMASS VILLAGE T. Michael Manchester, Mayor ATTEST: Trudi Worline, Town Clerk H:\Shared\Clerk\Ord.tc\00-20 Parcel N Construction 2nd Read _� 09 00 TOWN OF SNOWMASS VILLAGE TOWN COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING WHEN: October 16, 2000 WHERE: Snowmass Village Town Council Chambers 2nd Floor, Snowmass Center 0016 Kearns Road, Snowmass Village WHY: TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON: RESOLUTION NO. 36, SERIES OF 2000, A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND LANDSCAPING FOR AN ADDITION TO AND RENOVATION OF THE WOOD SHOP STUDIO BUILDING, PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 2, SERIES OF 1990. TIME: AT A MEETING WHICH BEGINS AT 4:00 P.M. THE EXACT TIME OF THE HEARING WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE AGENDA. INFO: A copy of the proposed architectural drawings are on file and available for review in the Snowmass Village Community Development Department at the above address. For further information call 923-5524. Trudi Worline, Town Clerk Posted and Published in the Snowmass Sun on 09/13/00 H:\wpdata\Planning\Phnotice\TC Ord00-15 Article V Code Amend PHNotice0l VIP COUNCIL COMMUNIQUE Meeting Date: October 16, 2000 Presented By: Planning Division Chris Conrad, Planning Director Subject: Discussion and Action: Resolution No. 36, Series Of 2000, a resolution approving the architectural design and landscaping for building additions and partial or whole renovation of the cafeteria, dorm building, and wood shop studio building at the Anderson Ranch Arts Center, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1990. Overview: The Anderson Ranch Arts Center proposes to add to and architectural modify the cafeteria building on the site to match the pavilion building to the west, to add minor enclosures on the dorm building to the east of the cafeteria, and to construct two additions onto the studio building located south of the cafeteria. Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1990granted approval for the Anderson Ranch Arts Center Master Plan and states that any future improvements need to be consistent with the 1990 conceptual plan. It also requires that prior to construction of any future improvements,the applicant shall submit architectural and associated landscaping details to the Town for its review and approval. Staff Comments: Please refer to the attached Planning Division Staff Report prepared by Jim Wahlstrom for additional information. Staff Staff recommends conducting the Public Hearing and then adopting Recommendation: the enclosed resolution. P:\user\jw\Anderson Ranch\TC Report Communique 01 _) I 1 Town of Snowmass Village Agenda Item No.5 Town Council Meeting Agenda Date 10/16/00 Planning Division Staff Report Project Name: Anderson Ranch Architectural and Landscaping Modifications RESOLUTION NO. 36, SERIES OF 2000, A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND LANDSCAPING FOR BUILDING ADDITIONS AND PARTIAL OR WHOLE RENOVATION OF THE CAFETERIA, DORM BUILDING, AND WOOD SHOP STUDIO BUILDING AT THE ANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER, PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO.2,SERIES OF 1990. Part 1: Summary of Application and Major Issues Applicant Information: Applicant: Anderson Ranch Owner: Anderson Ranch Contact: Doug Casebeer,Program Director Project Summary: The applicant and owner, Anderson Ranch,proposes to add to and architectural modify the cafeteria building on the site to match the pavilion building to the west,to add minor enclosures on the dorm building to the east of the cafeteria, and to construct two additions onto the studio building located south of the cafeteria. Trees affected by the improvements will be relocated and more trees added to the site. The site is generally located to the east of the intersection of Brush Creek Road and Owl Creek Road and east of the fire station located on Owl Creek Road. Please see Exhibits A through E describing the proposal. Applicant's Request: • Approval of Architectural and Landscape Modifications History or Background: According to Ordinance#02 of series 1990 for the Anderson Ranch Arts Center Master Plan, it states that"any future improvements shall be consistent with the conceptual plans attached hereto as Exhibit B. Prior to construction of said improvements,the applicant shall submit architectural and associated landscaping details for each improvement to the Town for its review and approval. The Town may grant said approval after a public hearing,noticed in a local newspaper for not less than 30 days, is held." See attached ordinance (Exhibit G). Community or Adjacent Owner Comments: None submitted at this time Major Issues Discussed During Development Review: • Exterior finishes and colors. Staff requested that the exterior finishes and material colors be labeled on all the building elevations. The applicant supplied the elevations for the cafeteria, the dorm, and the studio building noting the exterior finishes and colors proposed,which are _1 Town of Snowmass Village Agenda Item No. 5 Town Council Meeting Agenda Date 10/16/00 intended to match the treatment on the existing buildings located on the campus. Overall, staff finds that the upgrades and architectural changes proposed with the building additions are upgrade for the campus. Below are detailed descriptions of the changes proposed. • Exterior design upgrades for the cafeteria. The exterior finish or design modifications planned for the cafeteria are designed to be similar to or match the treatment on the pavilion meeting hall located to the west of the cafeteria. The improvements include: a) Remodeling interior to relocate kitchen to the east side of the cafeteria, including a 90 square foot addition on the northeast side of the building, and relocating the main entry from the east to the west side of the building; b) Constructing a 70 square foot addition on the southwest corner of the cafeteria for new bathroom space; c) Replacing the metal siding with 1"x 6" Spruce wood siding(untreated to weather naturally); d) Replacing the galvanized roof with a corrugated,raw steel roof,allowed to rust(similar to the meeting hall to the west); e) Replacing the fenestration in the cafeteria with glass overhead doors with wood stiles similar to the ones used on the meeting hall to create an open-air pavilion feel; f) Adding a covered porch for the pedestrian entry on the south elevation over new surface decking or boardwalk for improved pedestrian convenience; g) Replacing the 5-foot covered porch on the north side with an 8-foot covered porch; h) Adding a new fabric awning on a steel pipe frame over the expanded patio and outdoor seating area; i) Expanding and wrapping the surface decking for the outdoor seating area around the west,north and east sides of the cafeteria to create improved pedestrian connectivity between the meeting hall,the cafeteria and the dorm. • Exterior design upgrades for the dorm building. The following improvements are proposed for the dorm, design to blend or match the materials already on the building: a) Enclosing the northeast corner of the dorm and adding a second level deck; b) Enclosing two open vestibule areas at the two existing entries on the west side of the dorm, including the addition of a handicap restroom to serve the cafeteria; c) Adding a covered porch over the expanding surface decking, connecting to the outdoor seating area for the cafeteria, at the southwest inside corner of the dorm building; and d) Reconfigure the windows around the affected areas where the additions occur. • Exterior design upgrades for the studio building. The following improvements are proposed for the studio building,also designed to blend or match the materials already on the building: a) Constructing a 600 square foot addition on the north side is proposed for additional space for the wood shop located on the west portion of the building; b) Constructing a 500 square foot addition on the north-central side of the building for additional studio space, an office, and an enclosed main entryway area; c) Installing a covered deck with stairways above the garage/delivery area located on the west side of the building in order to remove stairs on the interior for additional space. • Floor Area. The net floor area increases by about 124 square feet for the cafeteria, 62 square feet for the dorm, and 1,100 square feet(plus an above-grade partially covered deck on west side) for the studio building. The total allowable floor area permitted by Ordinance No. 2, Series 1990, is 55,111 square feet. The applicant indicates that 53,276 square feet exists now _fie .. Town of Snowmass Village Agenda Item No. 5 Town Council Meeting Agenda Date 10/16/00 (Exhibit E). The additions,totaling 1,294.5 square feet, would increase the net floor area to 54,571 square feet,which is under the 55,111 square feet permitted. • Number of Units. Per Ordinance#02, of series 1990,the following number of units were approved for Anderson Ranch: 30 dormitory units(18 existing,with no more than 12 additional units) 1 dorm manager's unit existing 5 single family dwelling units existing 1 apartment unit existing The applicant is converting the lounge area on the first level of the dorm building into an additional unit with kitchen facilities. Staff recommends that either a PUD Amendment or an administrative modification to the PUD should be submitted by the applicant to revise the previous unit chart for consistency with the current proposal. • Parking. The applicant submitted a letter indicating that they believe the major additions are intended for extra space needed in the workshop and will not result in an increase in class sizes or additional classes(Exhibit F). The additions on the cafeteria and dorm are thought to be minor. Overall, staffs view is that the increase in floor area overall is negligible and won't have a significant impact, if any,upon the parking needs for the campus. The additional unit in the dorm building may generate one additional vehicle. • Landscaping. The applicant plans to relocate a few trees where the surface decking is expanding for the outdoor seating area, where building additions occur, and where a retaining wall is planned for the fire lane relocation south of the cafeteria. The applicant also plan to retain the Aspen trees along the south side of the cafeteria as well as add more trees in the general vicinity. The fire lane will be shifted to the south into the embankment with the addition of a retaining wall and an additional tree. There are no trees existing along the north side of the studio building where the additions are planned. Overall,the additions planned will not adversely impact or reduce the open space area on the campus. Please see the attached Landscape Plan for details(Exhibit Q. Summary of Staff Recommendation: Approval, with condtion that either a PUD Amendment or an Administrative Modification be submitted to address the additional unit in the dorm building. Part 2: Other Case Details (for reference only) Related Cases: None. Public Notification: No notice was required for the Planning Commission meeting. A legal notice appeared in the Snowmass Sun on September 13, 2000, 30 days prior to the scheduled October 16, 2000Town Council meeting,per ordinance#02 of series 1990. gnaw ) IY - Town of Snowmass Village Agenda Item No. 5 Town Council Meeting Agenda Date 10/16/00 Community Referrals: No referral notices were sent to town departments or outside agencies as the proposal was thought to be minor in nature given the extent of the existing improvements on the site. The applicant indicated that they're working with the Fire District to address the fire land relocation issues. Other Project Information: None Resolution Exhibits: (for reference and informational purposes only) Exhibit A Site Plans showing existing conditions and proposed additions(3 sheets) Exhibit B Affected building elevations of the cafeteria,dorm and studio building (7 sheets) Exhibit C Landscape Plan and letter(2 sheets) Exhibit D Applicant's Summary Letter of Description Exhibit E Letter from applicant justifying adequacy of parking on the site (1 sheet) Project Statistics: Surrounding Properties Direction Tlaingaa ` r_,A�tuai Ltae North OS Owl Creek Road and Open Space area beyond East PUD Fire Station,Parking Lot, and Community Chapel South PUD Golf Course West PUD Multi-Family Residential F.A.R.Ae of now F.A.R.u of 1990 Muter Plan Bu0doul Greta FAX Gross F.A.R. Staff House I Staff House I Ground Floor 742A SF 742.4 SF Ground Floor 742.4 SF 7424 SF Second Floor 655.0 SF 655.0 SF Second Floor 655.0 SF 655.0 SF Sair Opemng 281 SF 128.51 SF Sair Opening 28.5 SF 28S)SF 13689 SF I368.9 SF Staff House 2 Staff House 2 Ground Fluor 821.2 SF 821.2 SF Ground Floor 821.2 SF 821.2 SF Second Floor 500.0 SF 5W.0 SF Second Floor 500.0 SF 5W.0 SF Sass Opening 283 SF (2931 SF Sair Openme 28.5 SF 283)SF 1293.7 SF 1293.7 SF Staff House 3 Staff House 3 Ground Floor 828.4 SF 828.4 SF Ground Floor 828.4 SF 828.4 SF Second Floor 4700 SF 430.0 SF Second Fluor 430.0 SF 4100 SF Sair Opening 28.5 SF ,83)SP Sair OPCning 283 SF 128.51 SF 1229.9 SF 1229.9 SF Staff House 4 Staff House 4 Ground Floor 705.2 SF 705.2 SF Ground Floor 705.2 SF 705.2 SF Second Floor 580.4 SF 580.4 SF Second Floor 580.4 SF 580.4 SF Mech.Rm(exclm 20.0 SF 120.0)SF MecRRmmacim 20.0 SF ('_0.0)SF 1285.6 SF 1285.6 SF Dormitory Dormitory Ground Floor 3410.0 SF 341(K0 SF Ground Floor 3410.0 SF 3410.0 SF Second Fluor 3410.0 SF 3410.0 SF Second Floor 3410.0 SF 3410.0 SF MecRRmlexclu) IW.0 SF I Iwo)SF Mtth.Rm/exclm IWO SF (1(10.0)SF $air Ope min 38.5 SF 12831 SF So"Opening 28.5 SF (28.5)SF 67915 SF 6791.3 SF Cafe' Cafe Basement 1753.0 SF 1605.0 SF Basement 1605.0 SF 1755.0 SF Ground Floor 17520 SF 1752.0 00.0)SF Ground Floor 182.0 SF 1752.0 Wit)SF Mech.Rm(extlul 100.0 SF (100.01 SF Mtth.Rmlexdm IW.O SF (I(X.0)SF San Opemng 283 SF (28.5)SF Sair Opemne 28.5 SF . 1'_8.51 SF 77283 SF 3328.5 SF ccounicadsculpture Ceramicsl5culpture Lowm Floor 27280 SF 2728.0 SF lower Flour 2592.5 SF 2592.5 SF Ground Floor 3416.0 SF 3416.0 SF Grouts Floor 3419.3 SF 3419.3 SF Second Floor 1737A SF 1737.4 SF Second Floor 1960.1 SF 1960.1 SF M3enRm(exclul :450 SF 1245.01 SF Meeh.1to l 245.0 SF (245,0)SF 7881.4 SF 7971.9 SF Wood Shop wood Shop Ground Floor 2862.0 SF 2862.0 SF Ground Fluor 2862.0 SF 2862.0 SF Seared Floor 1087.3 SF 1087.3 SF Second Floor 1087.3 SF 1087.3 SF MccoArn(exclu) 50.0 SF (50.01 SF Mech.Rmlexclu) 500 SF 1500)SF 39493 SF 39493 SF Un Shnd/Stnd(o Un SheNStudio Ground Fluor 7563.9 SF 3563.9 SF Ground Floor 3563.9 SF 7563.9 SF 3563.9 SF 3563.9 SF GYY and Go.B. Ground Fluor 6994 SF 699.4 SF Ground Floor 699A SF 699A SF Second Flom 200.0 SF 200.0 SF Second Floor 200.0 SF 200.0 SF SWA SF 899.4 SF Painting Building Painting Building Basement 2957.0 SF 2957.0 SF Brearomt 2957.0 SF 2957.0 SF Ground Floor 2694.8 SF 36944 SF Ground Floor 2694.8 SF 2694.8 SF Second Floor 144.0 SF 144 0 SF Second Floor 144.0 SF 144.0 SF Mech.Rm(exclu) 167.5 SF (167.51 SF Mech.Rmtexdu) 167.5 SF (16)51 SF 5795.8 SF 5795.8 SF Photography Building Photography Building Basamem 1964.7 SF 1964.7 SF Basement 1964]SF 19643 SF Ground Fluor 20880 SF 2088.0 SF Ground Fluor 2088.0 SF 2088.0 SF Second Fluor 6000 SF 600.0 SF Second Floor 600.0 SF 6000 SF Mech.Rm(ealul 2110.0 SF 12W.01 SF Mech.Rm(exclul 21X.0 SF 1200.0)SF 4652.7 SF 4652.7 SF Children',Building Children's Building Ground Fluor 1024.0 SF 1024.0 SF Ground Floor 10240 SF 1020.0 SF 1024.0 SF 1024.0 SF Mole Hole IOId Pump Housing) Ground Floor 1275 SF 1273 SF 1275 SF Wash House Wash House Ground Floor IW.5 SF 1605 SF Ground Fluor 100.5 SF 1605 SF 1755 SF 1 W.5 SF Ranch House Ranch House Basement 881.0 SF 881.0 SF Ground Fluor 881.0 SF 881.0 SF Ground Floor 881.0 SF 881.0 SF Second Floor 8810 SF 881.0 SF Second Floor 881.0 SF 881.0 SF Sair Opemng 25,0 SP 125.0)SF Sair Opening 250 SP (25.01 SF Mech.Rmmxcly 50.0 SF (50,0)SF 1762.0 SF 2568.0 SF Dow,S. Dow Bum-Remodeled Lower Floor 1492.1 SF 1492.1 SF Lower Fluor 3087.0 SF 3087.0 SF Gallery level 1372.1 SF 17721 SF Gallery Level 1726.0 SF 1726.0 SF Second Floor 1157.8 SF 1157.8 SF Seared Fluor 1159.0 SF 1159.0 SF ---- Mech.Rmlexclu) 50.0 SF (500)SF Mech.Ro lm 500 SF (50.0)SI' 4022.0 SF 5922.0 SF Lecture Hall Ground Fluor 2354.0 SF 2354.0 SF 2354.0 SF D fZ Tu 49135.6 SF UIXI SF 541596 SF 53276.1 SF rl+ls prpPHlcat�oN Told Allowable 551116 SF Total AOolrable $51116 SF Religious,AnOabk AIM.Na Arta 69326 SF Remaining Available 19369 SF ■1 Baluice a%of Total 3.3% as",Rant 7709 Meg 1.I.a9 � • '6 r 1013100 T.C. 90-2 Page Four � p�n�q�GE 2 SERIES 19�b Exhibit A. Development Parameters A. Permitted uses sha: l be: - Community Cultural and Educational Facilities - Associated Residential Dwellinas - Residential Dormitory Housing fo :ility which snal). be directly associated with the Cu/.rural and Educational principle use of the property and wnich may rerrit employee housing that is not relat,�l to the pr3.ncipl use only during the months of Sept.e^b•2r throucr!h tray . Short term rental , as defined in ttz Town Mvni-__pal Code , of said units to emplovees and/or guests during these months is prohibited. - Kitchen and dining facilities that shall be f_r .::e use of dcrmitc,. y and manager's ui:it residents , Anderson Ranch Staff and students and attendees of Anderson Ranch functions only. - Trails - Open Space - Surface Parking B. Acreage: 2.54 acres C. Maximum Height: 38 feet to top of Ridge D. Maximum Floor Area: 55 , 11= square feet E. Minimum Setback: 1 foot front setback; 10 feet for sides and rear setbacks F. Maximum Number of Dwelling units : 30 dormitory units dorm manager's unit 5 single family dwelling units 1 apartment unit G. Unit Size: 144 square feet dorm room (average) 432 square feet dorm manager's unit 1 , 340 square feet average single family dwelling 550 square feet maximum for apartment dwelling in TOWN OF SNOWMASS VILLAGE TOWN COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 36 SERIES OF 2000 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND LANDSCAPING FOR BUILDING ADDITIONS AND PARTIAL OR WHOLE RENOVATION OF THE CAFETERIA, DORM BUILDING, AND WOOD SHOP STUDIO BUILDING AT THE ANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER, PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 2, SERIES OF 1990. WHEREAS, the Town Council previously approved the final P.U.D. Plan for the Snowmass Club Subdivision by Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1980, on March 31, 1980 (Snowmass Club PUD); and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1983 permits a developer to gain development approval on certain parcels of the Snowmass Club PUD only after an architectural design approval, including the subject property; and WHEREAS, the Town Council amended Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1980 in Ordinances 14 and 15, Series of 1987, thereby amending the zoning for the subject property that permitted certain expansions to the Anderson Ranch Arts Center; and WHEREAS, being concerned about future piecemeal expansions, the Town Council adopted Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1990, thereby granting zoning for the Anderson Ranch Master Plan; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1990, required further architectural and landscape approval of any improvements contemplated in the Anderson Ranch Master Plan; and WHEREAS, the Anderson Ranch Arts Center submitted on September 1, 2000 an application for architectural design and landscaping review for the building additions, architectural design, and partial or whole renovation of the cafeteria, the dorm, and the studio building, as described per the attached exhibits. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has heard a presentation by the Applicant and the Town Staff, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this application at their October 11 meeting subject to the conditions and findings contained within this resolution; and -Ilb • TC Reso.00-36 Page 2 WHEREAS, in accordance with published and posted notice, a public hearing was conducted before the Town Council on October 16, 2000 to receive public comments of the architectural design and landscape plans; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has heard a presentation by the applicant and the recommendation by the Town staff regarding the Applicant's proposal. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Snowmass Village, Colorado: Section One: Findings. Based upon the information provided and the testimony given during the meeting, the Town Council finds as follows: 1. The proposed project is generally consistent with the Anderson Ranch Master Plan, approved in Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1990. 2. The applicant has submitted sufficient information and designs to permit an adequate architecture design review. 3. The architectural design and renovation of the cafeteria building is considered an upgrade as the replacement exterior finishes will resemble the meeting hall building located to the west. 4. The building additions and renovations for the dorm and studio buildings will be designed to blend or match the existing design treatment and finishes on the buildings. 5. The increased surface decking and boardwalk areas around the cafeteria are not considered an increase in the floor area, but rather serves to improve the enjoyment of the surrounding open space area and serves to improve connectivity between the meeting hall, cafeteria, and the dorm. 6. The application has been submitted in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1990 and is in general compliance with the allowable zoning, floor area and land use parameters of the Anderson Ranch Arts Center Master Plan. goo TC Reso. 00-36 Page 3 7. Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1990 requires that the Town Council review the parking situation at Anderson Ranch each time a component of the Master Plan is submitted for review by the Town. The Planning Commission finds that the proposed additions and renovations will not increase the need for additional parking and that an adequate amount of parking for the proposed additions and renovations exists on adjacent property provided that proper parking, enrollment, and program schedule management continues to occur and that cooperation between the Chapel, Fire Station, and applicant continue to exists to ensure that problems will be resolved, as referenced in Exhibit C, Parking Lot Use, Maintenance and Improvement Agreement from Ordinance No. 2 of Series 1990. 8. Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1990 requires Anderson Ranch to provide a suitable number of trash dumpster container and sheds as future expansions occur. Trash dumpster sheds were constructed in conjunction with the approval conditions for the Ceramics Building Renovation (Council Resolution No. 31, Series of 1996) and no that additional sheds are necessary at this time. The Director of Public Works may require additional dumpster area as deemed to be necessary. 9. Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1990, requires that any architectural design proposal include a landscaping plan. Said plan, including the planting and schedule, sufficiently documents the applicant's plans to relocated impacted existing trees and add new trees on the site. 10.The applicant has proposed constructing a new dormitory manager's quarters as part of the dormitory remodel. This unit was not authorized by Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1990. Said ordinance did, however, permit twelve (12) additional dormitory units. The Town Council finds that the new manager's quarters could be permitted provided the applicant agree to remove the additional dormitory units from the Anderson Ranch Master Plan. Staff may then process an Administrative Modification to amend the Master Plan accordingly. 11.Following this approval, the applicant will have approximately 540 square feet remaining for future improvements. The Town Council believes that this floor area should be used to provide for minor A VWWWF TC Reso.00-36 Page 4 adjustments to the existing structures within the ranch and should not be used to create an additional detached building or dwelling unit. Section Two: Architectural and Landscaping Approval. The Town Council hereby approves the building additions, architectural design, and landscape modifications for the Cafeteria, Dorm, and Studio Buildings and the related update to the Anderson Ranch Master Plan 1990-2000, the plans which are more particularly shown in Exhibits A (Site Plans), B (Building Elevations and Floor Plans), and C (Landscape Plan) attached hereto, subject to the conditions contained in Section Three. Section Three: Conditions. This approval shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant submit an Administrative Modification application for review and approval to revise the PUD data to incorporate the additional manager's quarters residential unit with kitchen facilities on the first level of the dorm building prior to issuance of a permit on the studio building. 2. The remaining 540 square feet available pursuant to Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1990, should be used to provide for minor adjustments to the existing structures within the ranch and not used to create an additional detached building or dwelling unit. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on the motion of Council member and the second of Council member by a vote of in favor and against, on this 16th day of October, 2000. TOWN OF SNOWMASS VILLAGE T. Michael Manchester, Mayor ATTEST: Trudi Worline, Town Clerk H:\Shared\C1erk\Reso.tc\00-36 Anderson Ranch Arch Design •1011 so r e - AN K ' WON rf f, AiM Ilk Ky ¢ le � I • k � C a ' 1 � 1 " nowsm.av AWITM 11 �� I � � � a 00, M O ZOO y ,.. ...- c... ,I � ■ .rc.s w��sve.m..NU Sr rsvx��os� sneinrexani i' ALO �SZo�os�� ADDITION57 -- - / J uvsd¢seax ! / I F—-- 1 oQ og cn gz - x , WOE NOTE:An trees iMt ero renwveC ar ItlIbE Mml oonelrucllon 0 wltl M wltlt Inge of yeY eellim e 1 of cams les. D •i I, �_ In o"tlm%pros 70 e0ultlmel vacs an going to be —.LnnEsepe 0eelgning Is In pog� i .�.. � --- _ ■ .rsorosfowwm„s ses nexovs,uxs srn:ri nry A1.0li / - -- - T t_ N.,NTIII.14VpTry IN m - 0 < X WEST Vpl10N I EAST ELEVATIONS (p �MY.A4x�a�k W, ' :• __ VWxiYI,T�ntW Lmwwr�a x.nwir� V O 7 n` W CY, T s 0 Mi �n m ------------ a-���_ S01JiH ELEVpI%IN j —_ ivA1Ps Itirn9ivuwv�L.rc rerwxxu I I CAFE ELEVATIONS M.,a I •.. [A4001 N i Exhibit "B" Building Elevations and Floor Plans TC Reso. 00.36 Pg.2 of 7 .— W { M NK)UNYMNV NOS WNV .�1 dOHSQOOM/.IUOIIMOQ/.HdVD ly lffi i - - ° — yE d �a(P OW Exhibit "B" Building Elevations and Floor Plans 03MVITASSVWMONS TC Reso. 00-36 N (j 3 N 3D SLN q' V HJNV NOMONV P 3 of 7 1 F�l xuoaii�xoais�D 9iLLW1J - LQ iI IMP". 9 i n R uCl II 91 M1, O 1 W I b tF QI P Q IS W III a I g i E a ! i a � 1777111 Ill 11 j i I I W j a . _)�-� Exhibit "B" i i 83J.N3aSUV NJN NOSS3ONV Building Elevations and Floor Plans ii kNO11MOG/S:1VJ TCReso. 00-36 Pg.4 of 7 b 3 W a 0 a of° z Q Ij 6g e aa@ g \ \ --q li:-- I-,-, � `m' m 4l ago \ 00 00 33JN3J USY HJN"NOSV30NV Iyl• 7 9 T Exhibit "B" Building Elevations and Floor Plans TC Reso. 00-36 Pg.5 of 7 0 \ �Is N Y J$I S Q z! ZI apQl O U2 W N Q z 2 y ¢ 3 F I 5 \ w / '10 TO SCOTTO AT(—T- I I) � III I i �'� III I III Ly i„Ili L ,i e - - - mo T 6J W J ryl NfTl Fl f V AT(IN V s a zq m tWz,W z �— O . %u i 'l II9�I I i•�--`.u�m..._x._cw u.nu u m+V�o o o w 0�l a a m TOwwLA) (nRO%)<� '' v T W 0 v ALL N I.NOTE: -- ALL NEW WINDOWS: °� PAINTED WOOD WINDOWS,SIM. ON RtOPOSI AILO'IIffR WOOD MNDOWSON CAMPII$ WOODSI'8ARNRED FRAf.II'S ANDIRV WNN E Al...... -_ ... PALEGREPN SASH HIGUt2H n. Ip--1' wwdr W/LOW-E INSVLA'IING GLALNG ^.. . WF_SiE EVAiKK1 A4.1. I °:Yaovwnssv ONS Exhibit °B" aew33siavxaNVnN003ary Building Elevations and Floor Plans e NOId.IQQd dOHSQOOM TC Reso. 00-36 Pg.7 of 7 F yrs �_ aE ° s ° ° d UI ",4 b b —131 - / wi Oe rrl1 aM10y bMa rldltl. tb dnr lreea#Intl Oe alleaae AR F / RE L ATIdL� nmrsr�. STAFF RESmENCE LAWNS _—_ \ _—_ ...-. ' -- --'-• Aapem aneaea wnnataaaxl mlper in:MS. , F' e �_ bebrtresgance lswrl rea.Replace wnhabaa.- \ 21 :Ialesa ASpen lreea ebrg tlw Spefl Wel p -- -- \ (1 4•Cortamvootl aMeUeO. a111e CMe eller mn9lructlOn. O 1j Move b Sort real istee lawn area- Hu<i Iwo wCI Oetlennooa(s(a a leas) ' M.n..x. \. � a Inches artr coratueion. ccc]�!lJJJ Quh o 0 I 12•Hawlhom artecteE. : r Z // .--------- lxoxanng grove 09 M gxoA.5abolbthe well. - S Q Z –An I comheyeree a min.of (1)1 12•Hewtlwrn to be mgame in � � a O - "-- boa oro\. � o m O o • � " 3 T O m EXISTING TREE GROVE T � •I \ \ / V \ mud NOTE:Any trees that need to be moved or removed urepl replaced vduetlon vdtl either al moved slightly or the same rdM tress of equal caliper Inches and of the same apecles. • CononwooE tree alfecleal by construction. \ • Hawabm tree artecb l by constmc bran . _ • Aepentre9aneCteEbyeMshuCtoan LAHa IIAM� MIl1GATON Bristbcone Pine tree anecte l by colatructbn. 5�PISN 1U/11/VU OLD UY:10 (:11 b/UNGIO{OI L1Y111.. ^:lrtiVL!( Lei V V 4 L A N D S C A P E A R C M I T f C T P..'orC" Bo. 1537 JULIA MARSHALL 27400 T.<-R"re Rd*A.1 MT DALY ENTERPRISES LLC Bamh.olarado 81671 Exhibit "C" ra.97o 927 0138 a70 927 BaBi Landscape Plan TC Reso. 00-36 Pg.2 of 2 October 11, 2000 To: Chris Conrad Director of Community Development Snowmoss Village, Colorado Vio Fax: 923.1861 2 Pages Total Dear Chris. I worked with Lathrop Strang to develop the Landscape Mitigation Site Plan for the Anderson Ranch Arts Center woocishop/Cafe/Dormitory.The plan indicates that one cottonwood tree,seven aspen trees,two bristlecone pine and one hawthorn tree will be transplanted and relocated on the Anderson Ranch property. In evaluating the impact of construction with the contractor and owner in the field,it became apparent that Three additional howthoms would need to be transplanted. These hawthoms will be intermingled with the existing Mtn. Ash and Hawthoms on the hillside. The other trees are being transplanted to locations around the Staff Residences.The trees are being transplanted in conjunction with the schedule for construction. This is a good time to tronspicnt the trees as they are going into dormancy. I will be working with the Ranch to develop a landscape plan which will reflect the replacement of the trees around the Cafe and Woodshop. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Julia Marshall CC: Doug Casebeer Lathrop Strong 1� l Summery of proposed Anderson Ranch prolects-9.27.00 Cafe/Dormitory renovation- permit#4608 Exhibit "D" Woodshop Addition- oermit#4617 Project Summary TC Reso. 00-36 Cafe: Pg. 1 of 1 • Move kitchen to East end of building and dining room and entry to West end of building (adjacent to Meeting Hall and rest of campus). • Replace metal siding with wood siding to fit in with the rest of the Ranch. • Replace galvanized metal roof with rusty steel roof similar to Meeting Hall. • Expand footprint at entry (-70 S.F.)and kitchen (-90 S.F.)and extend north porch roof from 5 ft. to 8 ft. • Reconfigure and replace doors and windows to accommodate the reconfiguration of the program, including O.H. doors at dining area similar to the O.H. doors at the Meeting Hall. • Replace and reconfigure North Deck and Awning to allow for more comfortable and efficient outdoor seating curing inclement weather. • Replace pea-gravel with wood decking between Meeting Hall and Cafe. • Add wood boarawalk along south side of building. Dormitory: Move lounge from N/E comer to S/W corner. Expand existing bath there to be H.C. accessible. • Add covered porcn at S/W entry door. • Convert former lounge into another staff apartment, similar to the existing one upstairs. • Add uncovered wood deck to second floor staff apartment. • Reconfigure wincows in new lounge and new apartment to suit the new functions. Add new H.C. accessible bathroom next to south stairs with exterior door to serve the Cafe. • Refinish existing and new wood siding with clear sealer/stain. Woodshop: • Add 600 S.F. of shop space on the North side of the woodshop building. • Add 500 S.F. for a studio and office for the woodworking program director. • Replace an existing interior stair with an exterior stair with covered porch at the west end of the woodshop building. General Site: • Carve farther into the bank between the Cafe ana Ceramics Studio to allow more trees to be planted along south side of Cafe wnile maintaining a 24 ft. fire lane. • All wood siding, .vith the exception of Dorm. to remain untreated to allow natural weathering. • All metal roofs ana roof flashing, inciuding rlasningftrim for roof-top equipment. to be raw steel, allowed to rust similar to Meeting Hall. • All new wood windows to be painted to match the wood windows on the rest of the Ranch (dark red trim and frames. paie green sasnes). Anderson Ranch arts(enter Exhibit "E" Parking Report TC Reso.00-36 f000t September 29. 2000 Pg. 1 of 1 Jim Walstrom & Chris Conrad Building & Planning Department Town of Snowmass Village 16 Kearns Road Snowmass Village, CO 81615 Sirs. I understand you've requested a status of our parking requirements. The proposed projects (Cafe/Dormitory remodel. Woodshop addition) will not increase the student count. the Cafe and Dorm remodel is a quality upgrade of our current facilities. The Woodshop addition is to accommodate more turning equipment (lathes) and to provide more studio space for existing staff. The Woodshop addition will not result in larger class sizes or additional classes. Two years ago we redesigned the parking lot that we share with the Snowmass Chapel. The new design has provided us with more than adequate parking surplus over the last two workshop seasons. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 923-3181 #203 or email me at jbakerea-andersonranch.org Thanks for your assistance. Sincerely, ja es aker Exe ive Director - 13S COUNCIL COMMUNIQUE Meeting Date: October 16, 2000 Presented By: Gary Suiter/Steve Connor Subject: RESOLUTION NO. 31, SERIES OF 2000, APPROVING THE ENTRANCE INTO AN INTGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE SNOWMASS WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT Overview: This resolution approves an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town and the Water and Sanitation District. This agreement formalizes the previously informal agreement concerning building permit fee waivers and discounted system development fees for Town projects. Steve Connor drafted the IGA and will be available to answer questions. Recommendation: Incorporate any proposed changes from Work Session discussions and approve the resolution. v1NOso TOWN OF SNOWMASS VILLAGE TOWN COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 31 SERIES OF 2000 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ENTRANCE INTO AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE SNOWMASS WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT. WHEREAS,the Town is authorized to enter into this Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions of Section 1.4 of Article I of the Home Rule Charter; and WHEREAS, the District is authorized to enter into this Agreement in accordance with the provisions of Colorado Revised Statutes 32-1-1001(1)(d); and WHEREAS, the Town Manager recommended to the Town Council that an agreement with the District be approved to formalize the respective fees to be paid by the Town and the District; and WHEREAS, the Town and the District currently have a verbal agreement on the payment of fees that is formalized by the proposed intergovernmental agreement; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the entrance into an intergovernmental agreement with the District accomplishes a more efficient use of government resources. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Town Council of the Town of Snowmass Village, as follows: 1. Approval of Agreement. The Intergovernmental Agreement, a true and accurate copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein by this reference, is hereby approved on behalf of the Town. 2. Direction to Town Manager. The Town Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Intergovernmental Agreement on behalf of the Town. The Town Manager is further authorized and directed to take such actions as are necessary and proper to carry out the intention of the Agreement. 3. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or application hereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity shall not affect any other provision or application of this Resolution which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and, to this end, the provisions of this Resolution are severable. Res 00-31 Page 2 INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Town Council of the Town of Snowmass Village, Colorado on the 16th day of October, 2000, upon the motion of Council Member , the second of Council Member and approved by a vote of_ in favor and _ opposed. TOWN OF SNOWMASS VILLAGE By: T. Michael Manchester, Mayor ATTEST: Trudi Worline, Town Clerk Exhibit "A" INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the Town of Snowmass Village, Colorado, a Colorado home rule municipality, whose address is Post Office Box 5010, Snowmass Village, Colorado 81615, hereinafter referred to as the "Town", and the Snowmass Water and Sanitation District, a Colorado special district, whose address is Post Office Box 5700, Snowmass Village, Colorado 81615, hereinafter referred to as the "District'. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, this Agreement is authorized by the provisions of Section 29-1-201, C.R.S., et sea., concerning intergovernmental relationships; and WHEREAS, the Town is authorized to enter into this Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions of Section 1.4 of Article I of the Town Home Rule Charter; and WHEREAS, the District is authorized to enter into this Agreement in accordance with the provisions of Section 32-1-1001(1)(d) C.R.S.; and WHEREAS, the Town and the District have determined that the establishment of an intergovernmental relationship to determine the most efficient and effective use of the assets, powers and responsibilities of the Town and the District through cooperation; and WHEREAS, both the Town and the District are political subdivisions within the meaning of Section 29-1-202(2) C.R.S.; and WHEREAS, the Town and the District have approved the entrance into this Agreement by the adoption of Resolution No. 31, Series of 2000 and Resolution No. 6, Series of 2000, respectively; and WHEREAS, the Town and the District have determined that an agreement setting forth which fees are to be paid by each political subdivision for services from the other benefits the public health, safety and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties, and for other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Fees for Services. The Town and the District shall pay all applicable fees and charges of the other, except as follows: a. The Town shall pay the following: - 139 Res 00-31 Exhibit "A" i. The system development fee for potable water and sanitary sewer service shall be 30% of the system development fee set forth in the Rules and Regulations of the District. In the event that the Town facility is converted to a private facility, then at the time of conversion, a system development fee in the amount of 70% of the then existing rate shall be paid. ii. The Town shall be responsible for the payment of all cost and expense to physically connect the Town facility to the District system. iii. Service fees shall be determined in accordance with the Equivalent Residential Unit(EQR)schedule at the standard rate at set forth in the Rules and Regulations of the District. b. The District shall pay the cost of outside consultants actually incurred by the Town employed to assist the Building Official perform his duties as defined in Chapter 18 of the Town of Snowmass Village Municipal Code in lieu of the fees prescribed therein. 2. Termination. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, unless sooner terminated by either the Town or the District by providing ninety (90) advance written notice of termination to the non-terminating party. 3. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 2000 irrespective of the date this Agreement is actually executed. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused their respective names to be hereunto subscribed by their respective managers. Town of Snowmass Village Snowmass Water and Sanitation District By: By: Gary Suiter, Town Manager Richard G. Wall, District Manager Dated on October , 2000 Dated on October—, 2000 TO: SNOWMASS VILLAGE TOWN COUNCIL FROM: GARY SUITER, TOWN MANAGER RE: MANAGER'S REPORT DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2000 tttt***i*ttttttttt******KKKK#tf 1rt**Ott#tK*KK#tf fKKK#KfK***ir*ir#tt*****#*#**ff*fRRRttttt#*f*R*R*R BUDGET MEETINGS A reminder that the Town Council Budget meetings are scheduled for this Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, from noon until 4:00 p.m. Budget packets were distributed on Thursday, October 12'h. Keep in mind there is a tentative EOTC meeting scheduled for Thursday, the 19'h, at 4:00 p.m. in Snowmass Village. *AMENDMENT 21 Amendment 21 is the tax cut amendment, as proposed by Douglas Bruce. Does Council wish to pass a resolution or take a stand on this or any other election issue? Please let me know. OCTOBER MEETINGS For your information, there are no meetings scheduled for the 23d or the 301h of October. Please let me know if you have any agenda item that would require a meeting on either of those dates. *CAST PARK CITY TRIP A reminder that Town Council and staff will be departing for Park City Thursday morning, October 26'h. We will return on Saturday October 28'h. Please let me know if you have any concerns or specific requests with regard to this trip. *Response requested SNOWMASS VILLAGE TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 09-05-2000 Mayor T. Michael Manchester called to order the Regular Meeting of the Snowmass Village Town Council on Monday, September 5, 2000 at 5:16 p.m. Item No. 1: ROLL CALL COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor T. Michael Manchester, Douglas Mercatoris, Mark Brady, Jack Hatfield, Kevin Costello COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: All Council Members were present. STAFF PRESENT: Gary Suiter, Town Manager; Steve Connor, Town Attorney; Hunt Walker, Public Works Director; Craig Thompson, Community Development Director; Chris Conrad, Planning Director; Bernadette Barthlenghi, Landscape Architect; Dean Stahman, Planning Technician; David Peckler, Transportation Manager; Jim Wahlstrom, Senior Planner; Carey Shanks, Assistant to the Town Manager; Trudi Worline, Town Clerk PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: George Huggins, Bob Purvis, Bob Gaudin, Jim Benson, Doug Faurer, Arnold Mordkin, Jim Gustafson PUBLIC PRESENT: Jim Hooker, Dick Wall, John McCarty, Don Schuster, Bill Burwell, John Dresser, Bob Purvis, Lance Burwell, Linda Sandels, Michael Somma, John Skanks, Bruce Gentry, Larry Nelson, Madeleine Osberger, Bill Boineau, Dave Spence, Roger Malar, Jay Weinberg, John Meckling, Alan Richman, Sherri Sanzone, Bill Kane, Gerd VanMoosel, John Skank, Dave Hanna, Deidre Boineau, Scott Smith, David Bellack and other members of the public interested in today's Agenda items. 09-05-00tc Page 2 Item No. 2: PUBLIC NON-AGENDA ITEMS There were no Public Non-Agenda items. Item No. 3: GUEST— MICHAEL SOMMA HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS POLICY DISCUSSION Michael Somma, owner of a Country Club Townhome employee housing unit, explained that in 1994 when he purchased his home it was in need of repairs and upgrades. He requested that Council make an exception to the Employee Housing rules outlined in the Municipal Code and approve a credit of$6,000 to be added to the resale price of the unit for the improvements he was obliged to make after purchasing the home. He referred to his memo written to Council which listed the improvements made and the reasons he felt qualified him to receive the credit. Council discussed allowances for Crossings improvements, the need to maintain all of the Town's employee housing and the escalating price of employee housing in Snowmass Village. Council stated the need to address this issue for all employee housing and explained that to allow improvements would require changing the language in the Town's Municipal Code. After further discussion, Council majority denied the request. Item No. 4: JOINT MEETING WITH PLANNING COMMISSION - RODEO GROUNDS PRE-SKETCH DISCUSSION - SNOWMASS CLUB SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Rodeo Grounds Pre-Sketch Plan The Planning Director explained that Ordinance No. 9, Series of 2000 creates the opportunity for informal, non-binding discussion between the developer, Planning Commission, Council and the public. He stated that OTAK/Rock Creek Studios had submitted a Pre-Sketch Plan application for the Rodeo Grounds parcel on behalf of a potential purchaser of the land. OTAK representatives explained that the property is under contract to purchase from the Snowmass Recreational Land Company, LLC, although the sale has not yet been finalized. The design concept included employee housing as well as Townhomes to be used for working operations as well as for living space. The representative described the design as a means to preserve the Rodeo and its amenities. The proposal included employee housing, continuation of the current trail, realignment of Brush Creek Road as currently proposed in the Entryway Plan and a fishing pond. The plan also allowed for commercial construction and a convenience store/gas station in the area. 09-05-00tc Page 3 Conrad outlined the concept in relation to the Town's Comprehensive Plan. Roger Malar and John McCarty, of OTAK, representing the applicant, further outlined the conceptual plan for the site. Council and Planning Commission Members provided their comments and direction to the applicant regarding the conceptual plan. Members of the public and neighbors of the site, which included Jim Hooker, Linda Sandels, Hunt Walker and Bill Clark, stated opposition to the plan as presented at this Meeting. Snowmass Club Sketch Plan Council Member Brady stepped down from the Council table stating a conflict of interest. The Town Planner outlined the Sketch Plan Review process. Don Schuster of the Snowmass Club explained that this application is a re-submission of Phase II for the Snowmass Club. He further explained that the initial Phase II Sketch Plan was withdrawn in order to re-submit a more simplified application. He stated that the current plan reduces the density from thirty to twenty-one 4- bedroom units as well as reduced potential profits, capital risk and market risk. Sherri Sanzone presented two optional site plans based upon the 1999 Entryway Plan, which included relocation of Brush Creek Road. Gert VanMoosel described the architecture, exterior materials and height of the buildings, made up of single-level flat and two-story stacked units. He provided preliminary sketch elevations for the golf course building. Exterior materials will be those utilized in Phase I construction. Manchester requested that this plan be reviewed as a new, major PUD according to the Land Use Code. He read the language in the Land Use Code addressing a new PUD process and the related review criteria. Schuster explained changes proposed for the golf course. Hatfield stated that he does not feel the golf improvements are community benefits, the application is not consistent nor does it address the adverse impacts, increased density and additional unknown factors. He requested that the applicant pursue an entrance to the project from Brush Creek Road. Bellack stated that information requested by Hatfield is required for Preliminary Review of an application. Mercatoris requested that when reviewing the PUD the Planning Commission examine the application to determine if the development provides amenities for the public and determine if the variations are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and requirements of the Land Use Code. Costello stated that he felt the development would fill a need in the community. Schuster and Bellack addressed the history of zoning on the site and stated that the conceptual design had been reviewed and accepted by the neighboring communities. Gaudin suggested that the applicant expand the club house to include a community center. _ � 4q 09-05-00tc Page 4 Council requested future discussions be scheduled regarding future golf course expansion and stated the need to determine the appropriate desity for the site. Item No. 5: PUBLIC HEARING — SNOWMASS CLUB PHASE 11 SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING THE SNOWMASS CLUB PHASE II SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION (REVISED JUNE, 2000), AMENDING THE SNOWMASS CLUB PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, INVOLVING PARCELS 3, 4 AND 10 THEREOF Mayor Manchester opened the Public Hearing at 7:46 p.m. The Town Planner stated that the Public Hearing was published in accordance with the Municipal Code. He further stated that this application is scheduled for review by the Planning Commission on September 20, 2000 at 4:00 p.m. Bill Boineau asked Council to consider the proximity of this development to the Villa's North condominiums. Hatfield requested that this issue be addressed by the applicant. There being no further comments, Manchester closed the Public Hearing at 7:49 p.m. Item No. 6: PUBLIC HEARING AND DISCUSSION — PARCEL "N" AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING A RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE PARCEL "N" AFFORDABLE HOUSING PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMISSION INCLUDING SUBDIVISION PLAT AND REZONING FROM SPA-1 TO MF MULTI-FAMILY (continued from 08-21-00) Mayor Pro Tern Mercatoris opened the Public Hearing at 7:55 p.m. He explained that this Public Hearing was being continued from the August 21, 2000 Regular Town Council Meeting. The Planning Director stated that discussions are being continued from the Council Work Session held prior to this Meeting regarding the amended proposal. He requested direction on matters that Council may determine need to be referred back to the Planning Commission for further review and requested comments from the applicant and Council regarding recommendations received from the Planning Commission. Council reviewed the two optional site plans introduced during the Work Session prior to this Meeting and which reduced the number of units previously proposed. Council concerns were the effect on site stability and ground water retention. Scott Smith gave an overview of the new site plans which would reduce the "wall" effect of the buildings, move the buildings and emergency vehicle access farther away from the steeper slopes and from the property line and create additional 4� )45400 09-05-00tc Page 5 landscaping opportunities as well as substantial cost savings for the project. He explained that the new plans are a response to Planning Commission recommendations. In response to an inquiry from the Mayor, Meckling, site engineer, stated that he has not been allowed sufficient time to review the new plans. In response to an inquiry from Mercatoris, the Planning Director explained that the new design is a reaction by the applicant to the recommendations of the Planning Commission. Manchester stated that he felt the new plans to be an improvement and further explained the reasoning for the site plan submissions. Scott Smith further explained "Option No. 1" site plan, which eliminates one, 2- bedroom unit. This option includes 16 units. Mercatoris requested that the applicant investigate replacing the 2-bedroom with a smaller unit rather than eliminating the space altogether. Costello stated his understanding for the plan changes, although was not in favor of the new design. He also stated that he would defer his comments until he receives site information from the engineer and requested a report on the cost savings created by this optional plan. Hatfield requested information regarding the effect of the new plans on slope stability in relation to the original submission and further explanation of the decision to eliminate the unit. He also requested information regarding site impacts of the original plan. Hatfield stated that Council is in need of additional information in order to evaluate the optional plans and a reconfigured original plan. In response to a request for clarification from Mercatoris, Meckling explained that the optional plans present significantly less cost for retainage. He further explained the retainage needs for the optional plans versus the original plan. Manchester stated his preference for the plan which included three buildings on the site and explained his reasons. Mercatoris requested the amount of cost savings and a recommendation from staff. He stated the importance of visual impact as it relates to cost of construction. Smith explained that the optional designs were a direct response to Planning Commission recommendations. Alan Richman explained that the optional plans would allow for extensive landscaping surrounding this project as required by the Planning Commission Resolution. Manchester requested that the applicant re-evaluate the plans in consideration of Council requests for discussion at the next Council Meeting. He explained that Council would then determine if the plans require further Planning Commission review. Conrad stated that he would meet with the applicant and address future scheduling and topography. Manchester requested that the applicant provide the site engineer with information necessary to develop a Council report. After further discussion, it was determined that this item would be scheduled for the September 18, 2000 Regular Council Meeting. The Town Attorney requested that the Ridge Homeowners be advised of all changes well in advance of future discussion to allow time for their response. Meckling advised Council of the am- ' {(00 09-05-00tc Page 6 status of soil reports. In response to a question from Costello, Meckling reported that information gathered from a utility company employee, as well as the engineer's comparison of old and new aerial photographs, indicates that some of the 30-percent slopes on the site are natural and some are man-made. He indicated on a map where the man-made slopes and natural slopes were located. Richman explained that in order for Council to allow construction on 30- percent slopes, it must be determined if the slopes were man-made or natural. The group discussed the areas of 30-percent slopes using a map provided by the applicant. Meckling stated that he would provide a formal report to Council at the next discussion. Conrad further addressed construction on 30-percent slopes in relation to the restrictions of the Land Use Code. Dresser clarified the indications that some of the 30-percent man-made slopes are on top of natural 30-percent slopes. Manchester confirmed Dresser's statement. Ken Elbound, a Ridge Homeowner, stated his interest in the aestethics and economics and stated his concern with the stability of the hillside. He suggested construction of three smaller buildings set farther back from the toe of the hill. Hatfield reported that construction further up on the hillside increases the instability of the hillside, according to the site engineer. Hatfield requested that Meckling provide an opinion on his statement. There being no further comments, Mayor Manchester stated that this Public Hearing would be continued to the September 18, 2000 Regular Town Council Meeting at 4:00 p.m. Hatfield requested information relating to the number of feet between the buildings for each of the site plan options. Item no. 7: SECOND READING — ORDINANCE NO. 22, SERIES OF 2000 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING EMPLOYEE HOUSING RESALE PROCEDURES Mercatoris made a motion to table Second Reading of Ordinance No. 22, Series of 2000, seconded by Costello. The motion to table was approved by a vote of 5 in favor to 0 opposed. Item No. 8: SECOND READING — ORDINANCE NO. 23, SERIES OF 2000 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE VII, OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE IN ORDER TO MODIFY THE COMPOSITION AND DUTIES OF THE ARTS ADVISORY BOARD Mercatoris made a motion to approve Second Reading of Ordinance No. 23, Series of 2000. Costello seconded the motion. There being no further discussion, a roll-call vote was taken and the Ordinance was approved by a vote -141 - 09-05-00tc Page 7 of 4 in favor to 0 opposed. Council Member Brady had left the meeting. Item No. 9: RESOLUTION NO. 21, SERIES OF 2000 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ENTRANCE INTO AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE FORMATION OF THE ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, A RURAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Mercatoris made a motion to approve Resolution No. 21, Series of 2000, seconded by Costello. Manchester explained four changes made to the language as requested by the City of Glenwood Springs. The Mayor read the changes. The Town Attorney explained the changes. Mercatoris made a motion to accept the changes to the Intergovernmental Agreement as outlined by the Mayor. Costello seconded the motion. The motion to amend was approved by a vote of 4 in favor to 0 opposed. The Town Attorney stated that the Resolution is also being amended to include the Intergovernmental Agreement as "Exhibit A". There being no further discussion, the Resolution was approved as amended, by a vote of 4 in favor to 0 opposed. Council Member.Brady was absent. Item No. 10: MANAGER'S REPORT CAST Meeting In response to an inquiry from the Town Manager, Council majority tentatively agreed to travel to Park City, Utah for a Colorado Association of Ski Towns (CAST) Meeting. Council requested that Don Schuster of the Aspen Skiing Company be invited to provide a tour of the Park City and Deer Valley base areas. Council also requested that staff contact Council Member Brady to determine if he would be attending the CAST meetings. Staff will investigate travel arrangements. EOTC Meeting Hatfield stated that the next Elected Officials Transportation Committee Meeting (EOTC) is scheduled for September 21, 2000. Mall Transit Plaza/Initiative The Town Attorney explained that if a proposed State Initiative is placed on the ballot approved, it would affect future growth including construction of the Mall Transit Plaza as well as other development. He recommended that an application and Sketch Plan review be completed by September 13, 2000. Item No. 11: APPROVAL OF WORK SESSION SUMMARIES FOR 07-10-00 AND 07-24-00 09-05-00tc Page 8 Manchester made a motion to approve the Work Session Summaries as listed above. Mercatoris seconded the motion. There being no changes or additions, the motion was approved by a vote of 4 in favor to 0 opposed. Council Member Brady was absent. Item No. 12: DISCUSSION COMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCIL COMMENTS/STATUS REPORT Citizen of the Year Mercatoris requested that Council consider nominations for "Citizen of the Year" to be reviewed by Council at the next Meeting. Item No. 13: CALENDARS Town Hall Meetings Mayor Manchester stated that a Town Hall Meeting is scheduled for September 6, 2000, 5:30 p.m. at the Snowmass Conference Center. He requested an overhead projector be available for Regional Transportation Authority presentations. Tent— Summer Concert Series Mercatoris requested approval from Council for the Town to replace the tent used for the Summer Concert Series. He disclosed that he is the President of the Snowmass Community Fund, which sponsors the Summer Concert Series. Council requested that staff investigate and provide costs for the purchase. Council discussed appropriate ownership of the tent. The Town Attorney will advise Council on the issue of ownership. Aspen Mass Employee Housing The Mayor stated that the Aspen Mass Employee Housing competition process is nearing conclusion. Mayor Manchester stated that he would act as a member of the "jury" to determine a winner, whose name will be announced on Monday, September 11, 2000. Guber Trail Dedication Manchester requested that he be the first bicyclist to ride the new section of the Guber Trail following the dedication ceremony for the new trail connection. Mercatoris recommended the Mayor cut the ceremonial ribbon. 09-05-00tc Page 9 CAST Meeting Report Hatfield reported that he attended a recent CAST Meeting. Topics discussed included management evaluations and budget processes. Employers from Telluride reported on the rent control issue and ultimate Supreme Court case decision. The group made the decision to attend a State Legislative Session in an attempt to remove the rent control law as well as to remove the restrictions pertaining to Real Estate Transfer Tax in counties as well as municipalities. Hatfield further reported that information would be forthcoming from the Colorado Municipal League (CML) regarding the effect of Douglas Bruce's proposed election ballot question on governments and special districts. Country Club Estates Landscaping Hatfield requested that staff report on the status of the Country Club Estates sign landscaping project. Council Lim itations/Iniatiative In response to an inquiry from Hatfield, the Town Attorney will investigate Council limitations on any statement of support or opposition to a Citizen Initiated Ordinance Petition and report his findings to the Mayor and Council Members. Item No. 14: ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mercatoris made a motion to adjourn the Meeting, seconded by Hatfield. The motion was approved by a vote of 4 in favor to 0 opposed. The Meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. Council Member Brady was absent. Submitted By, Trudi Worline, Town Clerk _ ISO SNOWMASS VILLAGE TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 09-25-2000 CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 Mayor T. Michael Manchester opened the Regular Snowmass Village Town Council Meeting on Monday, September 18, 2000 at 1:00 p.m. He stated that this Meeting is being continued from September 18, 2000. Item No. 1: CALL TO ORDER AT 1:00 P.M. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor T. Michael Manchester, Jack Hatfield, Mark Brady, Kevin Costello. Mercatoris arrived at 1:20 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: All Council Members were present. STAFF PRESENT: Gary Suiter, Town Manager; Steve Connor, Town Attorney; Joe Coffey, Housing Manager; Chris Conrad, Planning Director; Hunt Walker, Public Works Director; Jim Wahlstrom, Senior Planner; Marianne Rakowski, Finance Director; Carey Shanks, Assistant to the Town Manager; Rhonda Coxon, Deputy Town Clerk; Trudi Worline, Town Clerk PUBLIC PRESENT: Alan Richman, John Dresser, Paul Broome, Scoff Smith, Madeleine Osberger, Bill Kane, Terry Hunt and other members of the public interested in today's Agenda items. NOTE: FOLLOWING ARE THE AGENDA ITEMS CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 REGULAR TOWN COUNCIL MEETING. NON-AGENDA ITEMS COMMUNITY POOURODEO PARCEL BALLOT QUESTION Rakowski provided Council with financial information regarding bonding for construction of a Community Pool. She explained that initially, Council reviewed bonding numbers for a 20-year payoff. At the Mayor's request she explained bonding information for 10-year and 5-year payoffs and the impact on residential and commercial property owners. Council discussed the numbers presented and _)s1 _ 09-18-00tc-cont'd Page 2 requested that the Finance Director provide further information regarding bonding for 5 years and 10 years. Item No.3: PUBLIC HEARING AND DISCUSSION — RESOLUTION NO. 25, SERIES OF 2000 TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING A RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE PARCEL "N" AFFORDABLE HOUSING PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMISSION INCLUDING SUBDIVISION PLAT AND REZONING FORM SPA-1 TO MF MULTI-FAMILY (cont'd from 09-05-00) (Public Hearing cont'd to 4:00 p.m.10-2-00) Applicant, Joe Coffey provided a revised site plan and explained that the units have been included in two buildings, one of which is stepped to eliminate the previous "wall" effect, moved the development further away from the Ridge Condominiums and the property line and farther uphill, to allow for additional landscaping. The revised plan presents a cost savings to the Town and includes ten 3-bedroom and six 2-bedroom units. The group discussed a revision to the three-building scenario in an attempt to retain 17 units, inclusion of gas fireplaces in the units, snow storage, emergency vehicle accessibility, height of buildings in relation to the story poles, number of parking spaces per unit and use of Real Estate Transfer Tax Funds for landscaping along Brush Creek Road. Coffey explained the Landscape Plan. Council requested that the landscaping include less evergreen trees and more Cottonwood, Aspen and variable color trees and that the project move forward as quickly as possible. The Town Manager stated that an Ordinance approving commencement of construction is scheduled for the October 9, 2000 Town Council Meeting. Due to a delay in planning, Coffey recommended that the interceptor drains be installed this Fall and the construction begin in March, 2001. Council requested that construction continue in 2000 as long as the weather conditions permit. Scott Smith provided exterior building material samples and colors. Council requested minor color changes. Council requested that cost per square foot and unit cost be provided as soon as possible. The Town Attorney stated that if this project receives approval for construction and is issued a Building Permit, the project would be exempt from the restrictions contained in the proposed Initiative Ordinance No. 1, Series of 2000, which will be included on the November 7, 2000 Election ballot. He explained that the Initiative is a project issue and not a Tabor issue. He further expounded on the statement. Sam 1 54;� aw 09-18-00tc-cont'd Page 3 Item No. 4: PUBLIC HEARING AND 1 ST READING — ORDINANCE NO. 15, SERIES OF 2000 TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT AND 1ST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RESTATING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE V OF CHAPTER 16A OF THE SNOWMASS VILLAGE MUNICIPAL CODE The Planning Director identified a correction to the Agenda, stating that a Public Hearing on this matter was scheduled for October 2, 2000. Mayor Manchester determined that the Agenda provided for public comment and opened the Public Hearing at approximately 2:15 p.m. The Planning Director explained his recommendation for unit equivalency. Hatfield requested that a certain unit equivalency for modifications be determined and included in the Code. Conrad provided his recommendation for determining unit equivalency regarding lock-out units, and stated that he felt lockout units are an item that need to be evaluated. Bill Kane suggested that individual condominium owners might not choose to participate in the unit lockout program and suggested that unit equivalency be determined at the time the application is being reviewed by Council. Manchester requested that language be included to address the issue of inconsistencies between the Buildout Chart and the Unit Equivalency Chart. The Town Attorney, Planning Director and Council further discussed the Buildout Chart as it relates to modifications of existing units and determined that language be included in this Ordinance that creates an interim process for evaluating unit equivalency for modifications of existing units until such time as the Buildout Chart can be reviewed and amended to address the discrepancy. Hatfield requested that the square footage of existing units be identified and a certain number be determined. The group discussed this issue at length. Bill Kane stated his appreciation to changes addressing building heights. Council further discussed the language addressing building height restrictions. There being no further public comment, Mayor Manchester closed the Public Hearing at 3:04 p.m. Mercatoris made a motion to approve First Reading of Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2000 as amended, seconded by Costello. The motion was approved by a vote of 4 in favor to 1 opposed. Mayor Manchester, Council Members Mercatoris, Costello and Brady voted in favor. Council Member Hatfield opposed. COMMUNITY POOL AND RODEO PARCEL BALLOT QUESTION At this time, the Finance Director returned with additional information regarding the Community Pool and Rodeo Parcel bonding information. She provided three financing scenarios: 20-year bonding for both issues; 10-year bonding for both issues; 20-year bonding for the Community Pool and 10-year bonding for the saw I� 09-18-00tc-cont'd Page 4 Rodeo Parcel. Council discussed the scenarios and chose the 10-year bonding for both the Community Pool and Rodeo Parcel ballot questions. RECONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 38, SERIES OF 2000 Mercatoris made a motion to reconsider Resolution No. 38, Series of 2000, seconded by Hatfield. The motion was approved by a vote of 5 in favor to 0 opposed. Rakowski stated that with 10-year financing, the amount for the Pool would be $2,320,000 with an interest rate of 6.55%, maximum repayment $3,295,950 and maximum annual debt service $351, 593. On the Rodeo Parcel, the amount would be $3,585,000 with an interest rate of 6.55%, total repayment cost of$5,092,155 and maximum annual debt service of$541,720. Mercatoris made a motion to amend Resolution No. 38 to replace the numbers and percentages with those listed by Rakowski. Hatfield seconded the motion to amend. Item No. 6: 2nd READING — ORDINANCE NO. 22, SERIES OF 2000 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING EMPLOYEE HOUSING RESALE PROCEDURES (Tabled from 09-05-00) Coffey explained that changes have been made to the Ordinance per Council's request. Mercatoris requested clarification to the language addressing improvements and the inclusion of a definition for "house option". Hatfield made a motion to separate definitions addressing employee housing condominiums from those addressing the Crossings by capitalizing the definition headings. The motion died for lack of a second. Council discussed a proposal that school teachers of the Aspen School District and employees of the Hospital District be qualified for purchase of Snowmass Village employee housing. Council also discussed retirement in relation to an employee who retires while living in employee housing and employment qualification requirements. Hunt Walker, representing the Crossing Homeowners Association, requested clarification of capital improvements and requested that appreciation on the homes be allowed to continue during the 30-day advertising period. Council determined that the request would escalate the resale prices of the employee housing and therefore would be inappropriate. Mercatoris made a motion to amend the Ordinance by distinguishing definitions of condominiums and the Crossings by capitalizing the definition headings. Costello seconded the motion to amend. The motion was approved by a vote of 5 in favor to 0 opposed. After further discussion, Hatfield made a motion to approve Second Reading of Ordinance No. 22, Series of 2000 as amended. Mercatoris seconded the motion. A roll-call vote was taken and the motion was approved by a vote of 5 in favor to 0 opposed. u.1sq . 09-18-00tc-cont'd Page 5 Council Member Costello left the Meeting at this time. Item No. 9: DISCUSSION COMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCIL COMMENTS/STATUS Speed Hump In response to an inquiry made by Hatfield, Walker explained that the speed hump on Meadow Road was removed with road construction for installation of fiber optics. The construction company will replace the speed humps when installation has been completed. Trail Closure Dates In response to an inquiry made by Hatfield, Manchester reported that John Wilkinson of the Trails Committee has requested to meet with Kevin Wright of the United States Forest Service (USFS) and discuss a more flexible schedule regarding trail closures. The Community Development Director stated that Barthelenghi would call and arrange the meeting. Trail/Melton I Hatfield requested that Council send a letter to the Melton I Homeowners Association advising them of Council's desire to complete the trail through their property and make the offer to pay for construction costs. Wildlife Official Hatfield stated a need for the Town to hire its own Wildlife Official rather than share a Wildlife Official with Pitkin County. RTA/RFTA Mercatoris encouraged voters to approve the Rural Transportation Authority (RTA) ballot question scheduled for the November 7, 2000 Pitkin County Election. He explained that if the measure is not approved, the Roaring Fork Transportation Authority (RFTA)would need to cut service or increase ticket fees in order to continue operation. Voter's Registration Drive Council agreed to a request made by Manchester to expend funds to promote voter's registration. He suggested a manned voter's registration table outside the Post Office, advertisement flyers and posters, registration forms be made available at the Employee Housing Office and advertising in the Snowmass Sun. Item No. 10 CALENDARS so 09-18-00tc-cont'd Page 6 Council/Staff Budget Review Council approved a verbal schedule for Council/Staff Budget Review meetings. The meetings will be held on October 17, 18 and 19 from noon until 4:00 p.m. Council directed staff to request that the Elected Officials Transportation Committee meet in Snowmass Village following the Budget meetings on October 19. Guber Trail Dedication The Community Development Director stated that dedication of the Guber Trail connection is scheduled for Wednesday, September 20, 2000 at 4:00 p.m. A Town shuttle will be available to provide transportation to the event. C.A.S.T. Meeting The Town Manager reported that airline tickets have been purchased for Council and designated staff members to travel to the Colorado Association of Ski Towns (C.A.S.T.) Meeting in Park City, Utah scheduled for October 26 through 28. Council Meeting Dates Manchester stated that October Council Meetings are scheduled to be held on the 2nd, 91h and 16th. November Meetings will be held on the 6`n, 13In, and 20`n. Item No. 11: ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Hatfield made a motion to adjourn the Meeting, seconded by Mercatoris. The motion was approved by a vote of 4 in favor to 0 opposed. Council Member Costello was absent. The Meeting adjourned at 4:20 p.m. Submitted By, Trudi Worline, Town Clerk � ' CI SNOWMASS VILLAGE TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 10-02-2000 Mayor T. Michael Manchester called to order the Regular Meeting of the Snowmass Village Town Council on Monday, October 2, 2000 at 3:43 p.m. Item No. 1: ROLL CALL COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor T. Michael Manchester, Doug Mercatoris, Mark Brady COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Jack Hatfield, Kevin Costello STAFF PRESENT: Gary Suiter, Town Manager, Joe Coffey, Housing Manager, Hunt Walker, Public Works Director, Craig Thompson, Community Development Director; Steve Connor, Town Attorney; Dean Stahman, Planner; Chris Conrad, Planning Director; Rhonda Coxon, Deputy Town Clerk; Jim Wahldron, Senior Planner; Trudi Worline, Town Clerk PUBLIC PRESENT: John Dresser, Rocky Huber, Anna Huber, Madeleine Osberger, Tim Truelove, Bob Purvis, Scott Smith, Bill Kane, Paul Taddune, Rick Griffin, Carolyn Purvis, Ann Larson, Tim Gomez and other members of the public interested in today's Agenda items. NOTE: Mayor Manchester stated that Item No. 8 on this Agenda would be heard at this time. Item No. 8: RESOLUTION NO. 39, SERIES OF 2000 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING JUNE BREEN GORDON AND SANDY STAY TO THE SNOWMASS VILLAGE ARTS ADVISORY BOARD Mercatoris made a motion to approve Resolution No. 39, Series of 2000, seconded by Brady. Council interviewed Gordon and Stay at the September 18, 2000 Council Work Session. There being no further discussion, the motion was approved by a vote of 3 in favor to 0 opposed. Council Members Hatfield and Costello were absent. dam 10-02-00tc Page 2 Item No. 9: MANAGER'S REPORT G rassRoots/Channel 11 IGA The Town Manager reported that he has been meeting with other Valley entities to discuss the possibility of forming a new television station on the existing Channel 11. Currently, the Public Education/Government Television Channel resides on Channel 11. Since resources are not available at this time for this endeavor the group has proposed creation of an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with GrassRoots Television. Goals for the IGA would be to stabilize government funding for GrassRoots, improve the quality of telecasts, provide more predictable air time for government meetings as well as additional air time for government issues, in exchange for the predictable funding. The Town Manager will provide Council with formal documents and additional information from GrassRoots for further discussion in the near future. County Health & Human Services The Town Manager reminded Council that the Pitkin County Health and Human Services budget meeting scheduled for October 3, 2000 in the Aspen City Council Chambers, 4:00 p.m. Voter's Registration Drive Mayor Manchester reported that a Voter Registration Drive is underway by the Town of Snowmass Village. Voter Registration forms will be available from 8:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. throughout this week. Volunteers will be stationed outside the Post Office to assist citizens who wish to register to vote. The Town Manager stated his appreciation to Town staff and volunteers from the public who are helping in this effort. Candidate Applications Manchester stated that applications are available for those who wish to run for the office of Snowmass Village Mayor or Council Member. The deadline to submit an application is 5:00 p.m. on October 6, 2000. Applications and petition forms can be obtained at the Snowmass Village Town Clerk's Department. The deadline to register to vote in the upcoming November 7, 2000 Election is October 10, 2000, 5:00 p.m. Item No. 10: APPROVE COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF 08-14-00, 08-28-00 AND WORK SESSION SUMMARIES OF 08-21-00 Mercatoris made a motion to approve the Meeting Minutes and Work Session Summaries as listed above. Brady seconded the motion. Mercatoris requested an addition to the 08-21-2000 Work Session Summary. There being no further " )Sg • 10-02-00tc Page 3 additions or corrections, the Minutes were approved by a vote of 3 in favor to 0 opposed. Council Members Costello and Hatfield were absent. Item No. 2: PUBLIC NON-AGENDA ITEMS Community Pool Council requested an update on the Community Pool. The Town Manager reported that Gary Ross is preparing a preliminary site plan, renderings and elevations for the pool, which is currently proposed for construction on the Horse Ranch Homeowner's Association common area property and utilities parking at the Rodeo Lot. The plans are conceptual at this time and subject to Council review and amendment. The information will be available to the public by the middle of October. Mercatoris requested that operation and maintenance costs be identified for public information. The Town Manager stated that he anticipates that operation and maintenance will require Town subsidy in order to make access affordable for local residents and ensure that use of the facility is optimized. Joe Coffey/Weed Warder Shannie Bliss, Chairperson of the Pitkin County Week Advisory Board and Ann Larson, both Snowmass Village representatives on the County Board, presented Joe Coffey, Housing Manager, and staff Ron Eggars and Tim Gomez with a certificate of accomplishment for their outstanding contribution to the war against noxious weeds. Bliss explained that poison Hemlock, which was identified on the Employee Housing site, was immediately eliminated by the Housing staff. The Board will provide Coffey with seed mix in 2001 for revegetation purposes. Item No. 3: PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. 15 SERIES OF 2000 TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RESTATING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE V OF CHAPTER 16A OF THE SNOWMASS VILLAGE MUNICIPAL CODE (Continued from 09-18-00) (Continue to 10-16-00) Mayor Manchester opened the Public Hearing at 4:02 p.m. The Town Manager stated that all submittals and notification requirements have been satisfied according to the Snowmass Village Municipal Code. He explained that the Planning Commission has not had sufficient time to review the document and provide recommendations to Council, therefore he recommended that this Public Hearing and Second Reading of Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2000 be continued to the October 16, 2000 Regular Town Council Meeting. There being no further public comment, Mayor Manchester stated that this Public Hearing would be _ )55 so 10-02-00tc Page 4 continued to the October 16, 2000 Regular Town Council Meeting scheduled to begin at 4:00 p.m. Item No. 4: PUBLIC HEARING AND ACTION — RESOLUTION NO. 37, SERIES OF 2000 TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT AND COUNCIL ACTION ON A RESOLUTION CONCERNING AN ANNUAL TEMPORARY USE PERMIT REQUEST BY THE TIMBERS AT SNOWMASS, LLC TO ALLOW THE RELOCATION AND CONTINUED USE OF A TEMPORARY MODEL FACILITY AND ASSOCIATED SIGNAGE WITHIN PARCEL K, FARAWAY RANCH GROSS PARCEL PLAT, FOR MARKETING THE TIMBERS CLUB AT SNOWMASS. Mayor Manchester opened the Public Hearing at 4:04 p.m. Dan Stahman, Planner, stated that all submission and notification requirements have been met by the applicant according to the Snowmass Village Municipal Code. He informed Council that the Planning Commission recommended approval at their meeting held on September 20, 2000. There being no comment from the public, Mayor Manchester closed the Public Hearing at 4:05 p.m. Mercatoris made a motion to approve Resolution No. 37, Series of 2000, seconded by Brady. Manchester questioned the issue of access to this property across Fanny Hill. The Planning Director explained that those accessing the facility would be ski-in customers. Tim Truelove, representative for the Timbers, stated that he anticipates the majority of the clients will be ski-in clients or will use snowshoes to access the facility from the parking area across the slope. After further discussion, Mercatoris made a motion to include a Condition in the Resolution which states that the applicant shall coordinate with the Aspen Skiing Company concerning all aspects of this operation including pedestrian access to the model unit and shall abide by their requirements. Brady seconded the motion. The motion to amend was approved by a vote of 3 in favor to 0 opposed. There being no further discussion, the Resolution was approved as amended, by a vote of 3 in favor to 0 opposed. Council Members Costello and Hatfield were absent. Mayor Manchester stated that sandwich boards are not permitted by the Town's Sign Code and requested that the applicant address this issue. In response to an inquiry from Mercatoris, Truelove stated that the current noise related to installation of underground drains on the project, should come to an end in approximately two weeks. Truelove stated that following this segment of installation, other equipment will be brought in for site work, which will also create 1000 10-02-00tc Page 5 additional noise. The Town Planner provided the days and times allowed for construction equipment operation. Item No. 5: PUBLIC HEARING AND DISCUSSION — RESOLUTION NO. 25, SERIES OF 2000 TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING A RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE PARCEL "N" AFFORDABLE HOUSING PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMISSION INCLUDING SUBDIVISION PLAT AND REZONING FORM SPA-1 TO MF MULTI-FAMILY (Public Hearing cont'd from 09-18-00) Mayor Manchester opened the Public Hearing at 4:13 p.m. He stated that this Public Hearing is being continued from the September 18, 2000 Regular Town Council Meeting. Joe Coffey, applicant representing the Town, requested that this item be tabled until later in the Meeting to allow time for the Parcel "N" team to arrive. Item No. 6: PUBLIC HEARING — SNOWMASS VILLAGE MALL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT CONCERNING THE CREATION OF THE SNOWMASS VILLAGE MALL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATUTORY PROVISIONS SET FORTH AT 31-25-1201, ET. SEQ. OF COLORADO REVISED STATUTES. THE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE BOUNDARIES AND SERVICE AREA OF THE PROPOSED DISTRICT IS COMMERCIALLY ASSESSED REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON OR ABUTTING THE SNOWMASS VILLAGE MALL, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION THE GATEWAY BUILDING, EXCEPTING THE CONDOMINIUM OWNED BY THE TOWN OF SNOWMASS VILLAGE (Continued from 09-13-00) Council Members Mercatoris and Brady stepped down from the Council table. Mayor Manchester opened the Public Hearing at 4:15 p.m. The Town Manager recommended that Council accept public comments and close the Public Hearing. He stated that an Ordinance for Council review and approval for formation of the BID is scheduled for November, 2000. There being no comments from the public, Mayor Manchester closed the Public Hearing at 4:16 p.m. Item No. 7: FIRST READING — ORDINANCE NO. 19, SERIES OF 2000 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RESTATING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 16A OF THE SNOWMASS VILLAGE ��W'v 10-02-00tc Page 6 MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ACCESSORY CARETAKER UNITS WITHIN THE DU DUPLEX ZONE DISTRICT Mercatoris made a motion to approve First Reading of Ordinance No. 19, Series of 2000. Brady seconded the motion. The Planning Director explained that an application has been received for a Subdivision Exemption for Lot I, Ridge Run Unit I. That property contains a duplex where one of the units is referred to as a Manager's quarters. He explained that this issue was discussed at a previous Town Council Meeting, when Council directed staff to consider creating a provision in the Municipal Code to legalize situations where duplexes with caretaker or manager units were in existence prior to the incorporation of the Town. Conrad explained that before 1985, owners were required to register caretaker or manager units with the Town. An investigation proved that several units constructed before 1985, as well as units constructed after the Code was changed in 1985, have not been not registered with the Town. Conrad explained that this Ordinance provides a mechanism for the Town to address the older, unregistered units. He further explained that all of the old registration provisions were eliminated with the adoption of the new Land Use Code in September of 1985. He further explained the method by which this Ordinance would provide an avenue to address any illegal caretaker and manager units. If Council approves the criteria set forth to address this issue, staff will provide an Ordinance setting forth criteria for registering caretaker and manager units as well as criteria for resale of the employee housing manager units and applicable housing guideline procedures. Mayor Manchester identified an error in the current Code related to AEU units and requested that the error be addressed by staff. Paul Taddune, stated that his client's request was that Council recognize the duplex at Ridge Run as an existing, non-conforming use since the units were created prior to the time the Town was incorporated. In consideration of the request, the owner's would agree to deed restrict the unit and include it as a part of the Town's employee housing. The Town Planner further explained the process. Manchester stated that this Ordinance allows anyone who has a current caretaker unit within a duplex, which was constructed prior to incorporation of the Town and which has not been registered, to come forward and register the unit. After further discussion, the Mayor called the question and First Reading of the Ordinance was approved by a vote of 3 in favor to 0 opposed. Manchester directed staff to provide language in the Resolution that requires the proposed manager's unit to remain an employee housing unit forever. 000M GOP 10-02-00tc Page 7 Item No. 5. cont'd from above: PUBLIC HEARING AND DISCUSSION — RESOLUTION NO. 25, SERIES OF 2000 TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING A RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE PARCEL "N" AFFORDABLE HOUSING PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMISSION INCLUDING SUBDIVISION PLAT AND REZONING FORM SPA-1 TO MF MULTI-FAMILY (Public Hearing cont'd from 09-18-00) John Dresser, representing the Ridge Homeowners, requested that the Homeowners be allowed to review the development plans before the Public Hearing is closed. Mayor Manchester opened the Public Hearing at 4:50 p.m. The Planning Director stated that the applicant has provided a written request to submit an amended application. He explained that a letter dated October 2, 2000 from Alan Richman of Alan Richman Planning Services, is included in the information provided for this meeting, and proposes amendments to the preliminary PUD Plan. Richman explained the formal proposal to amend the application, which he stated was in respond to Conditions outlined in Planning Commission Resolution No. 25, Series of 2000 and comments from the neighboring communities. He outlined the amendments, stating that the amendment reduces the number of units from 17 to 16, consolidates the project from three buildings into two buildings and now includes 10 three-bedroom units and 6 two-bedroom units. He also explained that parking spaces have been reduced from 49 to 47 spaces, although the parking ratio remains the same. Richman also stated that the project has been moved farther away from the property boundary, which allows all project construction and retention to occur within the limits of the property, allows for a significant increase in landscaping, reduces the visual impact to the neighbors, reduced the wall effect created by the previous three-building plan and enhances the site with other positive visual amenities. He requested that the applicant be allowed to move forward with installation of site drainage infrastructure. Mercatoris made a motion to accept the amendments and to determine that there is no need to remand the amendments back to the Planning Commission for review. He requested that the amended plan be provided to the Planning Commission for comments and informational purposes only. Brady seconded the motion. Council discussed affects the amendment may have on the site drainage plan and requested a site plan review and comments from the Planning Commission be included as a part of the Final Resolution approval. Council requested that less spruce trees and more Cottonwood and Aspen trees and various 10-02-00tc Page 8 landscaping material be used in the Landscape Plan. Council also requested that the applicant work with adjacent property owners to determine a final Landscape Plan for the site. There being no further comments from the public, Mayor Manchester continued the Public Hearing to the October 6, 2000 Regular Town Council. There being no further discussion, the motion to accept the amendments to the PUD plan were approved by a vote of 3 in favor to 0 opposed. Council Members Brady and Costello were absent. Item No. 11: DISCUSSION COMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCIL COMMENTS/STATUS REPORT This item was not addressed. Item No. 12: CALENDARS This item was not addressed. Item No. 13: ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mercatoris made a motion to adjourn the Meeting. Brady seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a vote of 3 in favor to 0 opposed. Council Members Costello and Hatfield were absent. The Meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m. Submitted By, Trudi Worline, Town Clerk SNOWMASS VILLAGE TOWN COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES 10-09-2000 Mayor T. Michael Manchester called to order the Special Meeting of the Snowmass Village Town Council on Monday, October 9, 2000 at 4:07 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor T. Michael Manchester, Douglas Mercatoris, Kevin Costello, Jack Hatfield COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Brady STAFF PRESENT: Gary Suiter, Town Manager; Steve Connor, Town Attorney; Chris Conrad, Planning Director; Craig Thompson, Community Development Director; Carey Shanks, Assistant to the Town Manager; Robert Voight, Senior Planner; Trudi Worline, Town Clerk PUBLIC PRESENT: Houston Cowan, Mardell Burkholder, Amanda Boxtel, Paul Broome, Alan Richman, Scott Smith, Madeleine Osberger, Bill Boineau and other members ofthe public interested in today's Agenda items. Item No. 2: GUEST — REQUEST FOR FUNDING — CHALLENGE ASPEN Houston Cowan, Mardell Burkholder and Amanda Boxtel were present at the Meeting to request grant funding for Challenge Aspen. Cowan explained that Challenge Aspen was not included on the Citizen Grant Review Board (CGRB) agenda to be considered for 2001 grants funding. He requested a grant of $9,000 from the Town to provide salaries for two Americore volunteers. The volunteers will assist the organization during the upcoming year. Boxtel outlined the activities for the upcoming year and further explained the need for funds. The Town Manager reported that he received information from the CGRB who reported that Challenge Aspen was not included on the grants review agenda because the organization did not meet the deadlines for filing required information with the Town. After further consideration, Council majority agreed to grant $4,500 to Challenge Aspen. Council Members stated their support and appreciation of the organization and requested that a grants contract for the funding include language which states that in order for Challenge Aspen to receive the funding, the group must meet all deadlines required by the Town. 16C go 10-09-00tc Page 2 Item No. 3: PUBLIC HEARING AND DISCUSSION ON RESOLUTION NO. 25, SERIES OF 2000 TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT AND COUNCIL ACTION ON A RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE PARCEL "N" AFFORDABLE HOUSING PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMISSION, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION PLAT AND REZONING FROM SPA-1 TO MF MULTI-FAMILY Mayor Manchester opened the Public Hearing at 4:31 p.m. The Planning Director stated that all submittal and public notice requirements have been met in accordance with the Snowmass Village Municipal Code. He explained that a draft form of Resolution No. 25, Series of 2000 has been included in the information packet for this Meeting for Council to review and provide further direction to staff. Conrad further explained that the Planning Commission would review the application before Final Review by Council. Conrad outlined changes to the Resolution as directed by Council during previous discussions, and reported that the issue of dust control during construction will be addressed in the Construction Management Plan. Mercatoris made a motion to approve Resolution No. 25, Series of 2000, seconded by Costello. Council requested that the contractor operate during the same hours as those set for the Timbers development. After further discussion, Mercatoris made a motion to approve amendments as outlined by the Planning Director and the applicant. Costello seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a vote of 4 in favor to 0 opposed. Council Member Brady was absent. Council discussed the amendments to the Landscape Plan as requested at their previous Meeting. After discussing the issue, Mercatoris made a motion to include a Condition, which states that an amended Landscape Plan will be provided to Council for review and approval during Final PUD Review of this application. Costello seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a vote of 4 in favor to 0 opposed. Council Member Brady was absent. Madeleine Osberger spoke in favor of Council's decision to address such items as window coverings and pets in the PUD Guide. There being no further public comments, Mayor Manchester closed the Public Hearing at 5:10 p.m. Council discussed construction proposed for the 30-percent slopes. After further discussion, and as required in the Municipal Code to address the safety for the development and surrounding neighborhoods, Hatfield made a motion to approve development on the 30-percent slope area. Costello seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a vote of 4 in favor to 0 opposed. Council Member - 14400 10-09-00tc Page 3 Brady was absent. There being no further discussion, Mayor Manchester called the question on the Resolution as amended. The Resolution was approved as amended by a vote of 4 in favor to 0 opposed. Council Member Brady was absent. Item No. 4: FIRST READING — ORDINANCE NO. 20, SERIES OF 2000 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING THE SNOWMASS VILLAGE HOUSING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONAL AUTHORIZATION TO COMMENCE CERTAIN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN PARCEL N, FARAWAY RANCH GROSS PARCEL PLAT Mercatoris made a motion to approve First Reading of Ordinance No. 20, Series of 2000, seconded by Costello. The Planning Director explained that approval of this Ordinance will allow the developer to proceed with limited construction activities specified in the Ordinance and further explained that bonding will not be required until construction for slope stabilization begins. Manchester requested that the bike path be available for use in September, 2001 to accommodate a bicycle race scheduled for that time. Staff will also notify the Timbers representatives of the need for the section of the bike path on their property to also be completed at that time. Paul Broome, contractor, explained that the goal is to begin construction on November 1, 2000. After further discussion, the motion was approved by a vote of 4 in favor to 0 opposed. Council Member Brady was absent. The Town Attorney explained that although it is not required, a Public Hearing on this Ordinance will be noticed and scheduled for the October 16, 2000 Regular Town Council Meeting. Item No. 5: RESOLUTION NO. 40, SERIES OF 2000 A RESOLUTION NAMING THE CITIZENS OF YEAR FOR THE YEAR 2000 The Resolution was provided at the Meeting. Mercatoris made a motion to approve Resolution No. 40, Series of 2000, seconded by Costello. Mercatoris stated Council's support to name Bill and Marilyn Getz as Citizens of the Year. He explained that the award would be presented to the couple at a Council Meeting in December, 2000. Council stated their appreciation to Mr. And Mrs. Getz. The motion was approved by a vote of 4 in favor to 0 opposed. Council member Brady was absent. ... '�� r 10-09-00tc Page 4 Item No. 6: ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Hatfield made a motion to adjourn the Meeting, seconded by Mercatoris. The motion was approved by a vote of 4 in favor to 0 opposed. Council Member Brady was absent. The Meeting adjourned at 5:25 p.m. Submitted By, Trudi Worline, Town Clerk - i�g - SNOWMASS VILLAGE TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION SUMMARY 08-14-00 COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor T. Michael Manchester; Kevin Costello; Jack Hatfield; Mark Brady COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Douglas Mercatoris was absent. STAFF PRESENT: Gary Suiter, Town Manager; Hunt Walker, Director of Public Works; Dave Peckler, Transit Manager; Steve Connor, Town Attorney; Craig Thompson, Community Development Director; Joe Coffey, Housing Manager; Chris Conrad, Planning Director; Rebecca Harlowe, Records Manager PUBLIC PRESENT: Mick Ireland, Dorothea Farris, Leslie Lamont, Patti Clapper, Nan Sundeen, Suzanne Konchen, Chris Kiley, Doug Mackenzie, Madeleine Osberger and other members of the public interested in today's Agenda items. The Work Session began at 12:30 p.m. JOINT WORK SESSION WITH PITKIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Mick Ireland of the Board of County Commissioners, summarized recent Commissioner discussions regarding a means to generate additional funds for affordable housing construction in Pitkin County as well as within the Towns and Cities incorporated within the County. He explained that the Board is currently considering requesting voter approval to assess an impact fee on larger structures and a property and/or use tax on smaller structures under a certain square feet number in size. Ireland suggested an Agreement between the County and the Town as a means to provide a share-back portion of the impact or use fees to the Town. These funds could be used to construct employee housing in Snowmass Village. He also informed Council that if the appropriate option is a property tax, a portion of the tax could be set aside by the County to subsidize future employee housing construction projects within Snowmass Village. Council Members and the Commissioners discussed options available, proposed ballot issues for the November 7, 2000 County and State Ballot and the County Housing Focus Group Survey recommendations. Council agreed that the County should pursue this effort and determine which option would be the most appropriate method for an election question to be included on the November 7, 2000 Election Ballot. County staff will investigate the options and report back to Council in the near future. 08-14-00ws Page 2 Mayor Manchester explained that the Town has been pursuing construction of a sign at the intersection of Highway 82 and Brush Creek Road to identify the direction to Snowmass Village for Highway 82 traffic. He further explained that an agreement on the exact location has proven to be a stumbling block between the County and the Town. He provided four options that have been identified for placement of a sign. Council Members and the Commissioners discussed the options provided. Commissioner Lamont explained that the locations proposed are not on Snowmass Village property, the sign proposals have not been directional signs and that the County is skeptical to amend their Sign Code, which could allow the proposed sign variances for all of Pitkin County. Ireland stated that he is willing to amend the sign code to allow a direction sign not to exceed a particular size for this particular sign, and to be located on the corner location. He suggested the composition of the sign be revised and presented to the County Variance Board. Lamont reported that during the last discussion on this issue, she requested that staff from the County, the Town and the City of Aspen determine the impediments and necessary approach to locate a sign on the Cozy Point corner. Staff will proceed as directed. UPDATE FROM JIM NISWENDER, GENERAL MANAGER OF AT&T CABLE Jim Niswender, General Manager of AT&T Cable, provided an update on additional services that would soon be available. He explained that a project is in process to upgrade cable television with new technology, employ new services and provide high- speed Internet services without the use of telephone lines. He further explained that infrastructure construction is underway to install fiber-optic lines to provide a hybrid, coaxial, broadband network. The new services are scheduled to be available by February 1, 2001. Invitations will be mailed for demonstrations to be held at the AT&T office. Niswender stated that Internet connection will cost the customer approximately $39.95 per month, per residence. In reply to inquiries regarding rate increases, he explained that rates would continue to rise as long as local providers have contracts with programmers whose rate increases are built into the contracts. Costello reported that he has received complaints from Basalt residents regarding GrassRoots television reception. Niswender stated that he is aware of the problems and is working to provide better technology and reception for GrassRoots. He addressed new programming, subscriber rates, expounded on upcoming services and transfer from digital to the new fiber-optic services. Council requested that AT&T meet with the Town Manager to discuss an issue related to recent construction on Fanny Hill where AT&T did not revegetate as required. DISCUSSION — ARTICLE V. SNOWMASS VILLAGE LAND USE CODE Planning Director, Chris Conrad summarized staff concerns and recommendations for amending the Code. He recommended a building permitting section and inclusion of enforcement provisions. Council discussed whether special reviews should come before Council, inclusion of the Pre-Sketch Plan process procedures in the Chart and a requirement for visuals of site plans. Council requested that the Town Manager develop a policy regarding provisions of waiving base fees. Council further discussed clarification of review standards for applications which amend zoning and decisions 08-14-00ws Page 3 made by the Planning Director's on Special Reviews that are consistent with the Code. Council determined that Special Reviews not consistent with the Code would be reviewed by the Planning Commission and Council. The group discussed variances subject to Excise Tax, determination of the area to notice neighboring communities around a development, notification to Council regarding ATUP renewals, appeal process for ATUPs. After further discussion Council determined that appeals would be reviewed by the Town Manager. Council requested reorganization and grouping of language pertaining to each review process in the Land Use Code. Council further discussed specific information to be provided during Pre-Sketch Plan presentations and requested that the Planning Commission review the sections pertaining to Pre-Sketch and Sketch Plan processes and provide recommendations to Council. Council requested that site plans be presented to Council in a form larger than 16 scale and that models and exterior materials and colors be presented during Preliminary Review. Work Session time will be scheduled to address the inconsistency between the Unit Equivalency Chart and the Buildout Chart. The Planning Director stated that he will contact Matt Delich to review the Traffic section and trip generations related to the Standard Traffic Code and review the criteria related to traffic at all intersections. Manchester summarized Council requests for staff to change or further investigate a building permit criteria section, architectural changes to a PUD, enforcement, unit equivalency, and referrals to the Planning Commission for the Preliminary Approval Process. Council also requested that information required for Sketch Plan Process and Preliminary Review Process be clarified and reviewed by the Planning Commission. The Planning Director will revise the document per Council direction for review at the September 5, 2000 Council Meeting. Mayor Manchester requested Work Session time to further discuss unit equivalency. TWO-CREEKS FREE PARKING David Peckler, Transportation Manager, stated that per Council's request during the previous discussion of the Winter 2000/01 parking program, staff met with representatives of the Aspen Skiing Company (ASC) and of the United States Forest Service (USFS) to further investigate free parking at the Two Creeks parking lot. The ASC has determined that the portal is under-utilized and would better serve all interests if free parking and equal-access were allowed at this location. Forest Service representatives have stated that discontinuing bus service at the portal is not a concern. Peckler explained that discontinuing bus service to the portal would create a cost savings to the Roaring Fork Transportation Authority (RFTA) as well as for the Town Shuttle bus service, with the elimination of bus service from the Rodeo Lot to Two Creeks. Peckler reported that the experiment to create free parking at Two Creeks was successful and provided a recommendation to continue the experiment through the upcoming winter season, and reviewed on an annual basis. Hatfield stated that he believes a fee should be charged for weekend parking, that free parking at Two Creeks undermines the Town's intention to promote use of the transit system and that free parking displaces the Aspen Valley Ski Club. He requested that 1") so 08-14-00ws Page 4 the permit system be further researched. Doug Mackenzie, of ASC, explained the process and bussing plans for the parking lot. Council requested that the ASC and Transportation Director develop an alternate plan in case of increased use of the lot. Peckler stated that the Annual Agreement with the ASC would be amended to allow flexibility. Council will review the Parking Management Plan before the Winter season. RECLAMATION OF PARCEL F. LOT 3. EAST VILLAGE P.U.D Mayor Manchester stated that this item would be discussed at the end of the Special Meeting following this Work Session or at another date. The Work Session ended at 5:30 p.m. Submitted by: Trudi Worline, Town Clerk POW IV UO SNOWMASS VILLAGE TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION SUMMARY 09-05-2000 The Work Session began at 2:00 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor T. Michael Manchester, Douglas Mercatoris, Mark Brady, Kevin Costello, Jack Hatfield STAFF PRESENT: Gary Suiter, Town Manager; Steve Connor, Town Attorney; Rebecca Harlowe, Records Clerk; Chris Conrad, Planning Director; Bernadette Barthelenghi, Landscape Architect. PUBLIC PRESENT: Don Schuster, Gary Ross, Mark Moebius, Scott Smith, Paul Broome and other members of the public interested in today's Agenda items. COMMUNITY POOL DISCUSSION Gary Ross provided a preliminary diagram sketch for a community swimming pool proposed for construction in the area North of the Town's Skateboard Park. He explained that the sketch was developed for the purpose of determining an estimate for construction costs to be included in a ballot question on the November 7, 2000 Town Election. He estimated the cost to be approximately $2.4M based on discussions with a pool expert and information related to the Basalt pool. The sketch included a 25-meter basic pool in a 7" shape and a small kiddie pool separate from the main pool. Acquisition of the Horse Ranch land proposed as the pool site, was not included in estimated cost. Snowmelting the deck area for winter use would cost an additional $80,000 and a solar water preheat system would be an additional $40,000 — $65,000. Since the pool will be an ongoing operation, Ross recommended including infrastructure for all cost- savings amenities, such as for solar pre-heating and snowmelting, in the initial construction. After further discussion, Council requested an upgraded fencing and the inclusion of infrastructure for future installation of snowmelting equipment. Council stated their desire for pool operation 6 to 8 months per year and that plans allow for future expansion. Council also requested information regarding operation and maintence costs and height requirements for fencing. Council will consult with the Town Attorney to determine the appropriate bonding amount to be included on the election ballot. DISCUSSION REGARDING ADD-ON FOR PARK SHELTER Barthelenghi provided estimated costs for additional items at the Community Park shelter as previously requested by Council. She stated that the addition of � 1 ► A 09-05-00ws Page 2 a stone fireplace with a two-sided seat wall would be $38,950, $13,500 for a three-sided stone veneer seat wall, and $17,200 for a custom-made stone barbeque. Including these items would leave $10,041 remaining in the budget for the shelter. After further discussion, Council requested that the three- sided stone seat wall and reinforced concrete floor be constructed within the shelter. Barthelenghi will provide Council with a date of completion in the near future. NOTE: Mayor Manchester stated that Parcel "N" discussion would be delayed until the end of the Work Session. REVIEW BALLOT QUESTIONS FOR 11-07-2000 REGULAR ELECTION Time Share Excise Tax The Town Manager provided research information regarding a Time-Share Excise Tax and average daily tax rates. After a lengthy discussion, Council determined that a ballot issue related to an Excise Tax on Time-Share units be postponed until further information is made available related to Time-Share units currently under construction. Comm_unite Pool The Town Attorney presented draft ballot language for funding construction of a Community Pool which was included in Council's packet of information. He recommended a separate ballot question for funding operations and maintenance for the pool. After further discussion, the Town Attorney stated that final ballot language will be scheduled for review and approval by Council at the September 18, 2000 Town Council Meeting. PARCEL "N" DISCUSSION The Planning Director outlined an amendment to the site plan which proposed elimination of one unit, reducing the proposed number of units to 16. The new site plan moves the construction farther away from the property line. He asked that Council review the amended application and determine if the amendments warrant further review by the Planning Commission. Scott Smith of Reno, Smith Architects, explained that the revisions combine three buildings into two buildings, eliminate one 2-bedroom unit, provide for additional landscaping and moves a portion of the construction away from the steeper slopes. Council discussed changes to grading and retainage and height of the two-buildings. Smith described exterior colors and materials planned for the buildings. He stated that John Meckling, site engineer, would be present during the Council Meeting following this Work Session, to answer questions regarding effects on the site. Council reviewed the Construction Management Plan with Broome, who explained the plan for site excavation, installation of trench drains and _ 17y - 09-05-flows Page 3 stabilization, winter impacts on scheduling and completion date. Conrad outlined the proposed hours of operation and review scheduling. The Planning Director reviewed the Condominium Documents, which address concerns expressed by the Ridge Homeowners. The Town Attorney provided information outlined in the Municipal Code which addresses a homeowners ability to rent out extra bedrooms in units containing two-bedrooms or more. Hatfield stated opposition to this allowance for condominium residences due to the impact on parking. Council further discussed this issue. Council requested that the applicant provide information relating to parking management and rental of extra bedrooms. The Town Attorney stated that the Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws are standard, although the Condominium Documents are specific to the needs of this development. Council discussed fines related to offenses against restrictions within the Documents, locations and procedures for Homeowners Association Meetings, authority of the Association Board, number of votes required for approval of various issues and liability for common area expenses upon resale in order to capitalization the Association. The Town Attorney explained that Condominium Documents can be amended and changed by the Association. The Work Session ended at 5:00 p.m. Submitted By, Trudi Worline, Town Clerk SNOWMASS VILLAGE TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION SUMMARY 09-11-2000 COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor T. Michael Manchester, Kevin Costello, Douglas Mercatoris, Kevin Costello, Jack Hatfield COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Council Member Mark Brady was absent. STAFF PRESENT: Gary Suiter, Town Manager; Steve Connor; Town Attorney; Chris Conrad, Planning Director; Jim Wahlstrom, Senior Planner; Rebecca Harlowe, Secretary/Records Clerk; Carey Shanks, Assistant to the Town Manager; Donna Garcia, Secretary; Rhonda B. Coxon, Deputy Town Clerk PUBLIC PRESENT: Patrick Leto, John Francis, Bill Kane, Bob Purvis and other members of the public interested in today's Agenda items. The Work Session began at 2:08 p.m. NOTE: Mayor Manchester determined that the Business Improvement District would be discussed at this time. BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (BID) Council Member Mercatoris stepped down from the table for this discussion. The Town Manager explained the square footage for the properties included in the BID, which were obtained from the County Assessor's office, and to obtain Council direction on this issue in preparation for the September 13, 2000 Special Meeting. The September 13th Meeting will include a Public Hearing on the BID and Council review of the BID Financial Plan. He explained that lots 2 and 3 of Silvertree PUD have been included, as well as the former location of the Cowboy's Restaurant, Silvertree executive offices and Mall retail space. He provided Council with a Financial Plan for the BID. John Francis, an owner at the Mall, stated that representatives of the properties included in the proposed BID have agreed to pay $1.00 per square foot to create a budget for the District. This should amount to approximately $1.6M in revenue 09-11-00ws Page 2 to be used for construction of the proposed Mall Transit Plaza. Francis explained that the $1.6M is a conservative number and could increase with an independent audit of the total square footage amount. Although the amount makes a statement of support by the Mall properties for the Transit Plaza, it falls short of the anticipated $2M. He explained that Snowmass Village Resort Association Board of Directors has agreed to pay $30,000 toward the inclusion of a new Conference facility in the Mall Transit Plaza. The Town Attorney explained that a Resolution approving formation of the BID would also be presented to Council at that time on September 13th. If the Resolution is approved, Council will then adjourn the Council Meeting and as the ex-officio BID Board of Directors, open the first meeting of the BID. If the Resolution is approved, acting as the BID Board of Directors, Council will review and approve the Financial Plan as well as review and certify the debt question. He stated that a Petition to form a BID was submitted to the Town Clerk and meets the requirements of the Colorado Revised Statutes. The Town Attorney stated his concern that a preferred plan and related costs for the Mall Transportation Plaza have not yet been identified. He explained that a preferred Transit Plaza Plan, the debt amount, a budget, the amount of the debt question, the contribution amount and the means for repayment of the debt all need to be identified for formation of the BID and for developing a ballot question. Staff and those proposing the development of the BID will provide the necessary information at the September 13, 2000 Council Meeting. The Attorney will meet with Bond Counsel in an effort to identify a bonding amount for a debt question. ARTICLE V— LAND USE DISCUSSIONS Chris Conrad, Planning Director, outlined amendments to Article V of the Land Use and Development Code (LUC). He stated that the PUD section has been amended by gathering all information throughout the document for each review process and consolidating it in one location. Conrad explained that the Building Permit Process calls for the Building Official to determine when a Building Permit is issued according to the Uniform Building Code. The Building Permit Process is being reviewed and will be included in the Land Use Code per Council's request. Also included was a statement that relates to development review, which allows Council to refer information back to the Planning Commission for further review and recommendations during Council's review of an application. Clarification of staff's role on enforcement issues and information to be provided by the applicant for Sketch Plan and Preliminary review processes has also been added. Council reviewed the changes to the document and discussed eliminating the Buildout Chart from the Land Use Code in order to simplify the process both for the applicant and for Council. After a lengthy discussion, Council requested that 09-11-flows Page 3 staff make adjustments to the Unit Equivalency Chart, leave the Buildout Chart as it is and add language which explains how redevelopment relates to the Unit Equivalency Chart. Council instructed the Planning Director to make the amendments to Article V and provide the changes for Council review at the next meeting. Mayor Manchester left the Meeting at this time. CITIZEN GRANT REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS Linda Sandals, Chairman of the Citizen Grant Review Board, was present to explain the recommendations made by the Board. After reviewing the recommendations made by the Citizens Grant Review Board Council made the following changes: Anderson Ranch Arts Center - Reduced from $13,000 to $11,000; Aspen Theater in the Park - Reduced from $5,000 to $2,000; Leadership Aspen - Reduced from $500 to $0 Little Red Schoolhouse - Reduced to $13,900 Sandels requested that the Town Manager provide the Grants Board with a firm budget number for the 2002 grants review. She provided information related to Challenge Aspen and explained that they were removed from the grants list due their history of disregard for Town reporting deadlines and lack of respect for the process. Council acknowledged the time and effort donated by the Grants Review Board and stated their appreciation. ARTICLE V— LAND USE DISCUSSIONS - Continued Council continued review of Article V and provided recommendations and direction to staff. They discussed community purpose, inclusion of a definition for sustainable development, the Unit Equivalency Chart as it relates to the Buildout Chart and requested clarifications and changes. After a lengthy discussion, Council stated that review of this item would be continued at the next Town Council Work Session. The Work Session ended at 6:03 p.m. Submitted By: Rhonda B, Coxon - Ilg - i Please Turn in Your Status Report Updates to Donna J. Garcia by November 1, 2000 at 5 P.M. Status Report Bullets in Italics have been previously listed State of the Town October 2, 2000 Town Council / Town Manager Activity/Staff Manager Status Mall Transit Plaza a Tabled until first of the year. Gary Suiter Entryway Planning Project ■ Working on Highline/Brush Creek intersection Gary Suiter design. ■ Developing site plan and rendering for pool. ■ Developing operating budget for pool. Town Manager's Office Activities ■ Doing employee reviews. Gary Suiter ■: Little Red School House lease renewal. ■ Water&Sanitation IGA. ■ Pay&Classification Plan up date. Town Attorne Activity/Staff Manager Status Town Attorney General Activities ■ Finishing Guber trail license. Steve Connor ■ Finishing revisions to the Snowmass Club I. ■ Finishing Timbers project documents. ■ Assisting on Droste reclamation project. ■ Assisting with Parcel Nproject documents. Housing Activity/Staff Manager Status Housing Department Activities ■ Joe had to leave for a family emergency. Joe Coffey ■ No new information to report. Parcel N. Employee Housing ■ Joe had to leave for a family emergency. Joe Coffey ■ No new information to report. Finance Activity/Staff Manager Status Finance and Personnel Activities ■ Finalizing Draft Pay& Classification Plan. Marianne Rakowski ■ Reviewing Parcel Nfinancial proposals GON111 • 1 I • Training two new employees. • Closing September financial statements. • Preparing budget document for Town Council budget hearings. Web Page Enhancement ■ Added Quick Links to main page. Nick Tucker Public Works Activity/Staff Manager Status ROAD STRIPING ■ Complete. Hunt Walker ROAD FUND ■ Work completed the week of October. Hunt Walker BRUSH CREEK CORRIDOR ■ Final report is complete. If you would like a copy, TRANPORTATION STUDY contact Hunt Walker. Hunt Walker SNOWMELT ROAD ■ Two loops have leaks that we have not been able Hunt Walker to find even using one of the top leak detector guys in the state. The two loops have been shut down, and will not be operable this winter. Fortunately, they are not located in the drive lanes. Town Clerk Activity/Staff Manager Status Town Clerk's Office Activities ■ Revising central file system Trudi Worline ■ Due to minimal response to Call-to-Artists AAB has decided to rollover existing public art budget until next year for a larger public art piece. ■ Updating Town Clerk section of Town Web Page. ■ Preparing for Municipal CodeBook updates. ■ Sending letters to real estate purchasers whom failed to file a RETT application in 1999. ■ Advertising for front desk position vacancy. ■ Issuing Business Licenses to businesses renewing their licenses for another year. ■ Preparing ballots, documents,and judges for November election. ■ Organized Voter's Registration drive and collected 73 new registrants to date. -1g0 - 2 Police Manager Police Department Activities W. Officer Brian Lemke is leaving the Department to Art Smythe take a position with the Pitkin County Sheriffs Office. We have started the hiring process for his replacement. • Laurie and Tina from our Animal Control Department have prepared a curriculum, and are going to be presenting a bear education program to the Aspen Middle School science classes. • The Animal Control department is coordinating with the Community Development on the Fall trail closures. The D.O.W. will be re-evaluating the dates of closure for the RIM Trail for a possible change next year. • We have started planning for this year's safe Trick or Treat program. Communily Development Department Activity/Staff Manager Status Community Development Director ■ Robert Voigt began as Senior Planner on October Activities 2°d. Craig Thompson ■ Entryway sign variance request submitted to CDOT-Denver. CommunijX Enhancement Projects Activity/Staff Manager Status Brush Creek ■ As-built survey needs to be done. Bernadette Barthelenghi ■ Drop Structure/Grading of new stream completed. ■ Working on installing New Jersey barriers along new Creek project. ■ NPS 319 Grant-Final report on the reek restoration is being written this Fall. ■ Staff is seeking survey or bids this week for planting and park design. DROP STRUCTURE/GRADING ■ Completed. OF NEW STREAM Bernadette Barthelenghi Park Shelter ■ Gazebo w/cedar shake roofing has been ordered. Bernadette Barthelenghi ■ Seatwall/footers to accommodate a seatwall will be added to the shelter. -l81 - 3 ■ Construction is scheduled for October/November due to contractors schedule. BRUSH CREEK AT SEANSONS 4 ■` Some re-vegetation&seeding will be done this Bernadette Barthelenghi month on bare areas. Environmental and Wildlife Activities Manager Brush Creek Field Guide. E. Contract completed. Project timeline June 2002. T.B.A. Plans & Policy Development Activity/Staff Manager Status Brush Creek/Benedict Trail ■ Began field survey June 30". Bernadette Barthelenghi ■ Reviewing survey data. ■ Staff will begin design concept for the Benedict Trail this Fall. ■ Hydrologist will be doing work this week on the Detention pond. ■ I am working on design concepts. Bio-Water Assessment ■ Monitorinq has been ongoing since July. Bernadette Barthelenghi ■ August 16` we began inventory offish in Brush Creek. So far, lots of sizes and colors have been found. ■ Monitoring for macroinvertebrate samples was completed last week. Greenway Master Plan ■ Input from Planning Commission expected in Sept. Bernadette Barthelenghi ■ GOCO final payment has been received. ■ Staff has requested printed copies for Planning Commission from consultant and is initiating. Land Use Code Amendments ■ Article V Work Session& Second Reading, Chris Conrad October 16th. Trails Planning ■ Sign program to be installed this summer/fall. Bernadette Barthelenghi ■ Wooden signs have been ordered for backcountry trails. ■ A lot of issues need to be researched by staff as decided in the Trails Meeting. ■ Ribbon cutting ceremony September 27th at 4:00 p.m. was a great success. ■ Staff is inventorying the trails this Fall. ■ Staff is setting up a meeting with Wildlife to discuss trail closures. slow' U r Watershed Management Plan ■* Data in a draftform has been submitted to the Bernadette Barthelenghi Town. ■' Mapping of the watershed data was successful. ■ A Steering committee needs to be formed. Reports and Forms ■ Standardizing a report format, review procedure for Jim Maelstrom PUDs, and application form for Land Use proposals. FLOWER GARDENS ■<.Numbered lots on Lower section have been put to Bernadette Barthelenghi rest&composted by landscape contractor. Major Develo ment Review U12date Project / Manager Update Daly Lane Conference Center ■ Received application August 2". Sketch Plan ■ Tabled by applicant on September 26th. Jim Wahlstrom Parcel N Preliminary PUD ■ Approved October 9th, T.C. meeting. Chris Conrad ■ Second Reading of the Ordinance to commence limited work on-site scheduled for October 16th T.C. meeting. Seven Star Ranch ■ Extension granted to November 20. Gary Suiter/Steve Connor Snowmass Center Expansion ■ Applicant considering amending application. Sketch Plan Chris Conrad Snowmass Club Phase II Sketch ■ Original application withdrawn June 12. Plan ■ Amended sketch plan submitted June 26 Jim wahistom IN Joint PC/TC meeting Sept. S. ■ P. C. review continues on October I1" The Timbers at Snowmass ■ Partial construction permit issued August 30`h. Chris Conrad ■ Completed final plat and documents,per final PUD. ■ Permits being issued. Minor Develo ment Review Update Project / Manager Update Tamarack Minor ■ Minor addition to create new office space and Chris Conrad improve pool locker rooms. ■ Approved administratively August 18`4. Building permit issued. am-In 00 5 Subdivision Exemption Lot 1, IN To condominiumize existing duplex plus caretakers Ridge Run Unit I quarters. Chris Conrad Lot 2,Ridge Run Unit 1 ■ Scheduled for October 16`h. Dave Ellis ■ Land Use Code amendment required. Second Reading November 6`h.Condominiumize existing duplex, T. C. meeting October 16`h 4,-;4'. .e a .n cl MHl .,v �.t z« Administration Modification, SUP, TUP, Variance Project / Manager Update Administrative Modifications ■ Snowmass Water Sanitation District Employee Housing, Governmental SPA. ■ Stonebridge condos - interim SPA for elevator. ■ Lot 13, Divide, building envelope adjustment. LOT 68,WOODRUN I ■ Building height constant outside envelope. Special Review ■ Public Works Operation Facility Expansion. ■ Toddler Center addition. ASC, DIVIDE LOT 44 ■ Special grading permit. Enforcement U date Project / Manager Update Brush Creek Offices ■ Draft an agreement to resolve the land use disputes Chris Conrad between Brush Creek Offices and Woodbridge Homeowners. ■ Commenced discussion with Owner's attorney October 10`h to resolve issues. Pending U date Project / Manager Update Netbeam Wireless ■ Discussions regarding placing antennae atop Chris Conrad Snowmass Center for wireless phone and Internet connections. • Process as minor SPA amendment. • Received diagram, showing location Iq 6 Snowmass Real Estate Expansion M Interim SPA administrative modification Chris Conrad application-received for 300 square R addition to building. St Planning Commission to review November 15`x. Snowmass Water& Sanitation ■ Possible re-zoning ofall Water&Sanitation Chris Conrad parcels to PUB—Public along w/possible employee housing project. • Complete application received. Will be processed as an administrative modification. • Approval granted for minor modification t Administration Building. Transportation Project / Maiiager Update COLORADO ASSOCIATION OF W Snowmass is hosting the Conference October 16 TRANSIT AGENCIES FALL through the.I8 h. CONFERENCE David Peckler HIRING WINTER STAFF FOR ■ Ads are running in local papers and on the Internet. BUS SYSTEM David Peckler SNOWMASS CLUB PHASE ONE ■t Discussion on possible location and design has BUS STOPS begun with the Country Club Townhouse David PwVer Homeowner's Association and the.developers. 0 Land access agreement would be presented to Homeowner's at Board meeting in January. Project Update Coordination-Gary Suiter 923-3777 ext.206 Public Works-Hunt Walker 923-5110 Housing-Joe Coffey 923-2360 Community Development-Thompson/Conrad/Barthelenghi/Ellis/SmhmanIGaunn'Coxon 923-5524 Town Clerk -Trudi Worline 923-3777 Finance-Marianne Rakowski 913-3796 Police Chief-Art Smythe 923-5330 Ids' Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday I Friday Saturday I II I!i October 2000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 - 2:00 TC WS 4.00 P.M. -Deadline for Pitoo HHS Mtg. Nomination In Aspen Petitions for -4:00 P.M. Council/Mayor TC Mtg. at 5:00 P.M. I ! 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 -2:00 P.M. ! TC WS !i -4:00 P.M. TC Special Mtg. -Last Day To Register to Vote for 1117/00 Election 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 -2:00 P.M. -12:00-4:00 .12:00-4:00 -12:00-4:00 TC WS CounciVStaff Council/Staff Council/Staff Budget Review Budget Review Budget Review -4:00 P.M. ! TC Mtg. -4:00 EOTC Q rosv (Tenatively) -530 P.M. ! Candidates Forum, Council Chambers 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5:30 Issues -C.A.S.T.Mtg. -9:00 A.M. Forum @ @ Park City C.A.S.T.Mtg. Town Council @ Park City Chambers it 29 30 31 BOO! _ HAPPY i HALLOWEEN!I Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday November I 1 2 1 3 4 I � I I I i 5 6 7 8 9 i 10 11 -2:00 P.M. -Election Day TC WS -4:00 P.M. TC Mtg. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 -2:00 P.M. TC WS i i it I 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 -2:00 P.M. -Thanks Giving TC WS Holiday -4:00 P.M. TC Mtg. -New Councit Oath of Office 26 27 28 29 30 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the Town of Snowmass Village, Colorado, a Colorado home rule municipality, whose address is Post Office Box 5010, Snowmass Village, Colorado 81615, hereinafter referred to as the "Town", and the Snowmass Water and Sanitation District, a Colorado special district, whose address is Post Office Box 5700, Snowmass Village, Colorado 81615, hereinafter referred to as the "District'. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, this Agreement is authorized by the provisions of Section 29-1-201, C.R.S., et seq., concerning intergovernmental relationships: and WHEREAS, the Town is authorized to enter into this Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions of Section 1.4 of Article I of the Town Home Rule Charter; and WHEREAS, the District is authorized to enter into this Agreement in accordance with the provisions of Section 32-1-1001(1)(d) C.R.S.; and WHEREAS, the Town and the District have determined that the establishment of an intergovernmental relationship to determine the most efficient and effective use of the assets, powers and responsibilities of the Town and the District through cooperation; and WHEREAS, both the Town and the District are political subdivisions within the meaning of Section 29-1-202(2) C.R.S.; and WHEREAS, the Town and the District have determined that an agreement setting forth which fees are to be paid by each political subdivision for services from the other benefits the public health, safety and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties, and for other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Fees for Services. The Town and the District shall pay all applicable fees and charges of the other, except as follows: a. The Town shall pay the following: i. The system development fee for potable water and sanitary sewer service shall be 30% of the system development fee set forth in the Rules and FIGURE 5-6 SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION PROCEDURES PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE (MANDATORY) SUBMIT APPLICATION PLANNING DIRECTOR DETERMINES PROCESS PUBLIC NOTICE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BY STAFF REVIEW OR DECISION -MAKING BODIES PLANNING DIRECTOR PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING COM MEETING MISSION ACTION BY PLANNING DIRECTOR TOWN COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING OR TOWN COUNCIL ACTION REFER APPLICATION TO PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC NOTICE AND HEARING BY PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ZJ- I_%ISIINu HCSIDLNt.I �- \ fi f i l l 11"ril nV _ G. T f I i �. GI � A \ I'14`, II Iy I1pUS 1� rI h�� Ci I q I I 1 I b i rl'l r 5 C; F f: 40 r Shl dw ilt lu:uunnl � n r I O ^ r � I r^r' c INI-UIR1f NKIOGh - @ 2n URUSII (Ad_bK HuN h R SITE PLAN tires l,10 30 w mu \ 1 ® MECHANICA T / o LAP OL LE RE POOL PLAY ST TURES �. PAIR co E HU s ®® SO C )\D Q B SKETBtA l-a I j b _ 9 / INFO o ® ® BRUSH CREEK ROAD SITE PLAN %m!mg 010 30 60 D Z III \ cn \ \\ \1 m cmn 4� mm \ z \ O � i ® O O Z � � SNOWMASS VILLAGE THE ROSS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL ARCHITECTURE & PROJECT MANAGEMENT RODEO LOT SITE wan 1fN ile IOIO<-LLI.0 I.0.p{6010 ' aew,ceuuoo b,eu m ebo-eao su eea-e« enonev wbae w,m m ewe i4R"" I 1 � I ' �\, P - � _ �1 �. v, - . ��: .. \ . � ��i - �r� �,, ,- �i;�`�° Y,, ��yl.. .., w ,, r � � \ � \r' Nom.YK� e'�i,� �T �� 1aY-i i ` V WW ,, � ' F Oyp` .n� . VJ �,\ �._ -. ��: .\ _ \ \ � \ .: N :.. v�YK, i a: :� J � _. ' TKO. .. ��\'�.. ��/ i� \ vT T \, v C' � � YNi .YT 1>\'Y tl. \ CY\`.^[Y ' / �� `T T < .\ \� >TM1 T< \ � ��� \, .. \.r. \..i.� .�a� v.\vT ..n O ��q \ \ T..1 A Tv `i�� v?.�\v U / ��� AST \� .`\ T� -. C,0 r a\v p � Op �YT T.` A �T N. � A 1 T �^ p \\O Y1�YT Y N N ,\.. Ii I �YN T� L\ } NY T :ETC`T TYN '-�� l \ \• •..rte>�. \ � ' ' -_ . .\.�P Y.T:a .\ \ T.T::\� � \ \ aN a� � N. N;YC i .'�\� \ T. '- � � s / �6 k � _/ r .'�'. / .r >^.....;... ,Yi ;.�..,�Y,�;�KY, � �i,.T.T.a..n. � 6. �^ ° Vii:::;: ti> - / � � � tI ;.!.: 7 �Ir7I1C1�1H � 3 n D t.:.�.[�� ..��:'.'�'i'14:1•'v't:.:.S.S:.i:.4..t:.L.['� '� � ?� �� _ ��� g.• �T,.,� �h r ' , , Vii'. >1 � 2 lu \• _ lit' •r � VA� •.rA T k `�.e. .- 111.] , �L •1 4 / .< , O �4k 1 / \\ wiA� • i / �� \ r rtY'Yr CC3�{�1��i�..� r O ` /�15�� •1• � , . _� �, - _ 11 . /' 1I Rail iF310fMtT I I � � x uiN�iE t i i i I ix[ � __.--_-__ . -_-______________ I O , r J O ■ ~ � ANDERSON RANCH Alt'I'S CENTER ■ ■ S � SNOWMASS VILLAGE,CO � ■ i T C I \1� 1 , ^ov�mrur: I \ � l 11 I I 1 .onmi.m.� 1 I i ---------- ----------- u ,I _ \J ■■ ■ i ■ � `�: -d-�---^'-"mod" M` DO%MITORY I . (t✓tt 1 O . / \ •• YTLLM tN i' xtu,ioo rtnu u,e� \ � ? c • \ I C � _ I L � a .UDITION¢ r z � NOTE: Any trees that are removed or killed durring construction will be replaced with trees of equal caliper and of the same species. In addition,aprox. 20 additional trees are going to be planted. —: landscape designing is in progress. J PROPOSED ADOMNS AND RENOVATIONS SITE P"N _ _ _ Y A1.0 I I,OGTION OF ROOF-TOP M TO EE R EOUPAff=M SIFFLICO�ORESfOR AND lAN51 O COMIGATEO.RAw TFII.ROOF.ALLOwED TO RUST-ISWR.VI TO MEEfWGiWlI AAfNINO.WD TIUTO MAlCl1 ROM I71pjI ., R - NORTH ELEVVAATION Q j WIDTE Alll l STOREFRONT-T WSYSTEM. SDl TO DDKS OW RFAACE POSTINGS I NOTE:SroREFROM wpvpOw�lt�iF.TNSfAIIfR NMOI wrtx f PORCX TO ADVLSE OH FIIlAL MULLION C;AFMa'UTUTION t YEN lARRID FR A ^\ r ON STEFI-!D'E FR.UQ. \ � ' / L tl InII I - j 1 I wMT/ELE':.anoN .SOL TO K.. �1 ,I r..SNIED K• � ]EK�roRc -DDRTW. _zco�s �--- � ��i INI N II'I Ill�l�ll Ill���l�llll�knl�lllllllllf���II��!-I -- - -- - - _ — _ _— _ — - W �,M SOUTH ELEVATION 0lSIR.STING CI..ssr� .ISDm.SRTD QH DOORS AT S4ITLHG KW.a 0 Ilim ............_... - I A�^I rnn u�wun+s OS'GWr50 DOORS: .• O6N.STIIIOOWSIAlIF155EA13JC am.umox coaRS w i�rwc xwu.l i O O I _..............-•--..wiennnnnnnmllnlnnmm I ,� ;gBYl nn.-,. _ I I EAST.—EV ATION -w.p4 LOGLL w e c. nw�FDTO wFatIER YAi11N.W.n '� V.O. mQ:00N]fiG iUl11 � �� ci F_V.C.'YG a'COD wdDOwS wT Rh'101: -=O�SAfm I =�'�fALRCCf. j �i I I h91M ?ate :AFE EIEVAi70N5 DNS r.r4 A400 y , LOW LANDSCAPE WN15� Q a � � - - ---- ----- '------------- _ I I iIl :i i sv��wo,vt.smou�i VIII��I CG/6iEDd11C+C.- �� � I SiEBGRAIEP/E711RQ10�' 614 zi I ;, I = 1�ACE�'1WfN0i 0 SLE3� -u i --- � Dg ; . 1 -PLY. ---' r SEC.. . SEC:21 I I �J A R R Y 1 E A G O F v/I 1 a i _ G , _ 1 / . } ^ Z s z 5 i :'.0 ivwm 4� I � �\ CAFE LEA-FL i MAN VE 1 P ~,r •H'.1 O• A20 r �P-- I - - COMFUM ET&FOOF E60C�RS RiNRlG �_ � �❑ IDGOCIS r�wwaoow>.+oowsro ,Ep,#w.ww wom w"D N1,CI,FASI.IG To WTCHEO MOOD tjo ff 4 �.. ro evro�FZS�wnwan oaw — I NEW VAM DOORS MTf11 FlAl - LJGKM PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION PROPOSm VEW FM ❑ C ,'ii ' � ! I i ` DOOR MD ID=twm POSM S PARTIAL NORTH ELEVATION�FiO s. ..e M A R R Y ,�7ra u E A G U E 'CT IRCHITECTS �} 7 1 1 _1 I 1 _1 II I ' lil � l ll ! I � —1 \ .11 III 0PFRAMWVA)0VVS Eli -=11 fAM Z PAF7 f1AL SOUTH E1FVA710N PROPOSED a¢_ Z N -_• \Z 3 aAPES iO BE RDAODE ED 'u0TE ALL REPLACED SIDWG TO BE CEDAR CHANWELiTP Z¢ NnH CLEAR SEALER TO MATCH EX S-..M -; 1 1 I I II: I I >EWY WDCORWTHFR -CIR PO 0t ADDDr S� -- GALV.PX!'AEIDED WIFE AER1 PANELS.I ffi "GCEDAADECKM j EXPOS®VODD.ICLS S A DBEAMS. LCGOCLS �An 'eak4 Fa 3 t J�'e.ml NEW WOW WWDOWSTO 1 MATCH E OS W.THRXR DOM Pmcpcsm —� ¢-- IATIONS PARTIAL EAST ELEVA71ON-PROPOSED :;a•- i'-0 A42Lq NIMPORCl1ABV. o---------- o, FILL N CORNER 1 1 NEWWOOODECNATGPADE j TEST AssTi/l ATE flAT11 ANDIGTCNETTE MTMROOMS I •� A7n 00 s /LO. 3 , � � NEW BIFOL Y i+EW IAuN ROOM/ CN!?_ 3A6WLLa i SIXM NSli4'W.WD jj/ _ � REa11fIV,OWwEI NEW 9ATHR001.1 / !L NEC:O.� i VENGNC - NEW�T i ___ _'/� // LLINEXISTING NDT T N WYM_, PAW=-i 3ATIfOOMS i '%P521. =AAIE NEW W,NDLYI AND 1X!0.5., / -CCRCP 114 SINWA '%t'CIA- - S 9 : :xE cN v vFVcc +RFs 90$nNG PRE SPgNn_ER EO FRAME INS REMOVABI PAN&I� ANCE" 0 A R R Y, Lt I.-yr.,..tC4/ E A G U .;.RCHITECTS rnrxaw ruwrw� ' IMOVE FIFE SPiNQFA NC.MA O W J I {CG TE SINK) a -1 > z n n � N -- w ^n Z rx aoocirvB cry I wB AT•6•'EXPCSEDI —us II -�.�Cry GMOE j =APES-0 BE?EMMELED I vN RANCH CCRM RENOVA7CN- LEIIE PLAN .11-T i ' DORMITORY LEVEL 1 PLAN I,I I!4"= F4' A212 ' - -- - ---------- oil, I o , A 8 A Y -Y N , EAGUE .� ;. .•.RCHITECTS IL -�- • tidt w�-n N nseav mm>wr I._. �✓ OO y nPx N � I Z i Q N � Z r Q Q \ Z � Z1 Z _ARES-0 BEREVME :ae sue0 f^r V wmn ;SCN RANCH DCRM RENCVA i ION- LEVEL 2 PLAN L_°/EL 2 PLAN •ra• = 1'-0• A2111 ({.�.� a �•., (MP��{WM IL r �i(�•�IIIIIII�•' � � 3l ���� i • �i �! O. =Lca" WEST ELEVATION �sl JF� O .ra A R R Y 7 E A G U E Poop ,1RCHITECTS I /J I I �� III III I-• r I �I � I � I I I II .n.vn. ..nm,.n ��1�1�J'Lv�i�L I 1 I I : I I ! �10O1aY ru Mrm it I 11 I I I i1 I IIII I'Ii i ff I: III II I f I! �11 aHVL II j �I IIII III II IIII it III I I I I � '. I ' i I'::II I III II I li I I I � IIII II " II ill I ( II I iII III i I I I I � 'I"I IIII I III ,� 11� IIII li I If 1 1 I i'Ill I I I'I III I! �1 - - 9 = NA= l AT n, +r vino. L. ¢¢ ZN 4� ?Z I ¢ Z � �Ew w000 coox wrtpiwsuoxr li . I aomccwaartD rrmnoorv+c. I I u.srrta'�x�rrexc.evosm. i I a.iu4 s�.as.we cou,t.aua --- wtv.rn-rve�uvnw.uto Rnas I I I 1 CIQ 1 4VOSFD R.t.ADM IOtY13. l QALIM AIN AM1D STi4'IS C. - $TAYIt' 7F.-- - asO F+ _— �-3LLW SIRQJC�It, i ?tL0 _ s—] �YOODTRFKIS 11.:900 �^�� __ __ - � AFIIND••OOD T�FA®CY _ _ _ . _ _ -GEVE�L 07ET ALL NEW WINDOWS: PAINTED WOOD WINDOWS.SLM.TO ?ROPOSED ! ALL OTHER WOOD WINDOWS ON CAMPUS ! WOODSHOP I (BARN RED FRAMES AND TRIM WnH ELEVATIONS I PALE GREEN SASH HIGHLIGHT), 1/6'= I'-0' W/LOWE INSI LATTNG GLAZING 1 ,1. 06- lay . IW it 7 y m 1 It =harrette k 7 =harrette =ELO ATE"ISTN WINDOW 1 - � iELJVE 315TIM Si.IP' ✓ ��� i \I ^ =IF! ' OCR II L' If. A R R Y E G U E ARCHITECTS 1 Ii _ I I 'ILIGNNEW W4l'MIME IST'w LZ � I V I aNCrn.E aoou 71REC-[^.•R_cp_'DIO Y Q '. Z -1 ;a a r�.�/:-'•UMLSGKF Iii `••/ iE10GiE JJOF n _ ei 0 T' /: :N4'E55 C Q ,I• _ S 1 -�� C i i Suoe RmE ", • ,rao�w „um ru --- PROPOSED _- _ _ _ - WOODSHOPI LEVEL I PLAN 1/3" -� A2.1 I STAFF STAFF ���� BESBJENCE /Mn A FOR ,E N LOC I - STAFF RESID LAWNS I BFSmE�rCE �� 1 . . ................. I ...PASIllIOry \\ \ / CB BUBDNLrO \ \ iE WB&VK TO \ ai040DATE FlRE Ll�E1 - 1 REA FOR i REE RELCCATICN-�.L•'i,- j ,/EXISTING REE 3ROVE 7' / Z // j/ i Stiw EC[£. / NMB lay I'D �nomoDMOTlOr / ry � \ surf Any Bristlecone Pines that are DOrtV�lDNY ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ aESiD in the way the proposed landscape walls, ■ will be moved slightly to the north. No other trees should be affected in this area. IF I \ail •��I �" .ri" ��_-- ---- -- � ._ _ . }}. ) — ,(�iA.r� "DS An*'11; I I DE�FIJ(G r'�trroiw � 7 Asoens affected with a total of 21 caliper inches. _ _ kAove to staff residence iawn area. Replace with at least/' -- �21 cancer incnes of Aspen trees along the South wall Z V (1) %' Cottonwooa affected. :f the Care arter construction Move to staff residence lawn area• s 's reoiaced with cottonwood(s)of at least 1 camper incnes after construction. .:. Z z3 11) 1 1/2" Hawthorn affected. move to existing grove z zi _ aorox. 50 feet to the West. 1 z — After construction, a min. or < '11 1 1;2" Hawthom to ce rec:amea� ^ -� n the prox\N. 11n DSxov ,3Dma.• NOTE: Any trees that need to be moved or removed durring construction will either be moved slightly or replaced with trees of equal caliper inches and of the same species. Cottonwood tree arfected by construction. Hawthom tree affected by construction. �\ Aspen tree affec-ea by construction. gNDSCSAPE NtmcATION Brisdecone Pine tree affected by construction. "1 O?LAN y F.A.R.as of now F.A.R. as of 1990 Maslei Plan Ituildoul Gross F.A.R. Gross F.A.R. Staff House 1 Staff(louse I Ground Floor 742.4 SF 712.4 SF Ground Floor 7424 SIT 7,12.4 SF Second Floor 655.0 SF 655.0 SIT Second Floor 655.0 SF 655.0 SF Sair Opening 29.5 SIT (29.5) SIT Sair Opening 29.5 SI' (295) SI' 1368.9 SF 1169.9 SF Staff House 2 Staff(louse 2 Ground Floor 821.2 SF 821.2 SIT (44,111](1 Floor 821.2 SF 821.2 SIT Second Floor 5M.0 SF 500.0 SF Second Moor 500.0 SIT 500.0 SIT Sair Opening 28.5 SF (29.5) SIT Sair Openiop 29.11 SIN 1?8.S) SF 1292.7 SIT 12'12.7 SF Staff House 3 Still 11ousc 3 Ground Floor 828.4 SF 828.4 SIT Ground Floor 928.4 SIT 929.4 Sid Second Floor 430.0 SF 431!0 SIT Second Floor 4111.0 ST: 410.0 SIT Sair Opening 29.5 SIT (29.5) Sl: Sair Opcniug )8.5 .';I' 2R 'I) .Sic 1229.9 SF 1229.'1 SIT Staff House 4 SlalI I louse 4 Ground Floor 705.2 SI' 705.2 SI' Grooud Moor 705.2 S1' 705.2 SIT Second Floor 590.4 SF 590.4 SI' Second Floor 58(1.1 Sl: 580.4 SIT Meeh.Rru(exclu) 200 SIT (20.0) SF nL•,h l2in0� s� ho 2011 Sl (100) SF 1295.6 SP 1295.6 SI' Dormitory Donnilory Ground Floor 3410.0 SF 3410.0 SIT Ground Floor 3410.0 SI' 3410.0 SIT Second Floor 3410.0 SF 3410.0 SF Sccond Floor 141011 SIT 3410.0 SIT Mech.Rm(exclu) 100.0 SF (I00.o) S1: Mcrh.I(nneae hi) 100.0 SI (loon) .S I' Sair Opening 28.5 SIT (29.5) SIT Sair Opening 28.5 Sl: (29.5) S1: 6791.5 SP 6791:6 SIT Cafe' Cale' Basement 1605.0 SF 1605.0 SIT Iimemcnl 1605.0 SF 1605.0 SIT Ground Floor 1752.0 SF 1752M SF Gnmud 14our 1752.11 SIT 1752!1 Sid MechAni(exclu) 100.0 SF (100.0) SF Merh.lim(rxrhi) 100.0 SIT 11(1).(1) Sl: Sair Opening 29.5 SIT (29.5) SIT Sair Opening 29.5 SF (29 �t tir 3129.5 SIT 1328.5 SF Ceramics/Sculpture Criamic s/Scolptuu. , Lower Floor 2728.0 SIT 2729.0 SIT Iaraerl9oor 2+'x25 SIT Ground Floor 3416.0 SF 1416.0 SF Ground I lour 1419.1 SIT Second Floor 1737.4 SIT 1717.4 SIT Second IIoor 19601 SIT Mech.Rm(exclu) 245.0 SF (215.0) SIT Mech.Rm(cx(lu) 215.0 SI' 0) SIR 7981.4 SP Wood Shop Wood Shop Ground Floor 2862.0 SF 2962.0 SF Ground Moor 2862' M62 1) SIT Second Floor 1087.3 SF 1087.3 SF Sccond Floor Io 1097.1 SF Meeh.Rm(exclu) 50.0 SF (50.(1) SIT Mech.l2m(exchi) (50,0) SIT I 3949.3 SF io493 SF , Kiln Shed/Studio Kiln Shed/Studio Ground Floor 3563.9 SF 3563.9 SF Ground Floor 35619 SF ' 3563.9 SF 1561.4 SIT Barn Gales Barn Second Floor 2(N).0 SF 2(91.0 SF Second Flo n Sl; 2(9(0 SI: 899.4 SI' 999,4 SF Painting Building Painting Buil Basement 2957.0 SF 2957.0 SF Basco 29570 SI' 2957.0 SI; Ground Floor 2694.8 SF 2694.9 SI' Can. 2694.9 SI' 26)1.9 SF Second Floor 144.0 SF 1449 SI' SCE, 114.0 SI' I411) SI' Mcch.Rm(exclu) 167.5 SF (167.5) SI' 61. i 161.5 SI' (167.5) ':1' 5795.9 SF 5795.9 SI' Photography Building Photop ,,mg Basement 1964.7 SF 1964.7 SF I 1'(617 SI' 1064.7 SF Ground Floor 2099.0 SF 2099.0 SF .nor 208R.O SI' 2099 0 SI' Second Floor 600.0 SF 600.0 SI' lour 600.0 SI: 60(11) SF Mech.Rm(exclu) 2(91.0 SF (200.0) SI' N. .nr(ex(lu) 20(11) SI; (200.0) SI' 4652.7 SF 4652.7 SF Children's Building Childteii s Ruildiug Ground Floor 1024.0 SF 1024.0 SF Ground Floor 102411 SI: 10240 SF 1024.0 SF 10249 SI' Mole Hole(Old Pump Housing) Ground Floor 127.5 SF 127.5 SP 127.5 SF Wash House Wash Ilome Ground Floor 160.5 SF 160.5 SF Ground Flour 160.5 SI' 160.5 SF 160.5 SF 160.5 SF Rauch House Ranch Iluuse Bascntcut 891.0 SI' 9819 SF Ground Floor 881.0 SF 8919 SF Gmund Flour 991.0 SF RRI 0 SI' Second Floor 891.0 SF 891.0 SI: Second Fluor 991.0 SI' RR 19 Sh Sair Opening 25.0 SI; (25.0) SI: SailGpeuing 2511 SI' (259) ST- MCeh.Rm(cxC hl) 511-0 Sid (50,0) SI' 1762.0 SF 2569.0 SF Vows Barn I lows 11:1111 Remodeled Lower Floor 1492.1 SF 1492.1 SI' Lower Floor 3097.0 SI: 10979 SI' Gallery level 1372.1 SF 13711 SF Gallery Level 1726.0 SF 17260 SI' Second Floor 1157.8 SF 1157.8 SF Second Floor 1 1590 SF 1159.0 SI' , Mech.Rm(exclu) 50.0 SP (50.0) SI' McCh.Rin(exclu) 50O SI' (50.11) SF 4022.0 SP 59220 SF Lcc(me Hall Ground Ivor 2151.0 SI' 2354.0 SI' t 2354.0 SF ( ' 49135.6 SF 48178.1 SF 54158.6 SF 53276.1 SF i Total Allowable 55111.0 SF Total Allowable 55111.0 SF Remaining Available Allowable Area 6932.9 SF Remaining Available 1834.9 SI' J I, Balance as'7, of'I'utal Y� 9514.3 Ranch Bldg Area 1.6.99 10/2100