02-08-22 Final Krabloonik Supplemental Report received 2 8 22.pdfSupplemental Report
(received 2/8/22 via e mail from Seth Sachson)
Over the past several months, numerous concerned parties, including but not
limited to previous Krabloonik employees, have alleged that Krabloonik is
operating in violation of its June 1st, 2015 contract with the Town of Snowmass
Village (the “Contract”) and is violating state laws promulgated by the Colorado
Department of Agriculture. I have served as a volunteer member of the Krabloonik
Best Practices Review Committee (the “Review Committee”) for the past 7
years. In that capacity, the Town of Snowmass Village has requested that I submit
a supplemental report documenting my observations and recommendations
regarding Krabloonik following a Review Committee visit to Krabloonik on
January 17, 2022.
Site Visit Observations
On Monday, January 17, 2022, fellow Review Committee volunteer, Bland Nesbit,
and I performed a surprise inspection of the Krabloonik facility. We arrived at
Krabloonik at around 3pm and left at 4:40 pm. Bland called Krabloonik owner,
Dan Phillips, after we arrived so he could inform his staff members that we were
Review Committee members there to perform an unannounced inspection and
instruct them to cooperate with us in performing our duties.
The following are observations from the inspection:
1. Dogs
We counted a total of 192 dogs that were either in chain link kennels or on chains,
as well as 7 older dogs that wandered the property and interacted with visitors,
staff, and the other dogs. We were told that of these approximately 199 dogs, about
33 are retired from pulling sleds. In accordance with their contract, Krabloonik is
not allowed more than 175 dogs on premises, but Mr. Phillips had informed us in a
previous Review Committee meeting that Krabloonik has a waiver from the Town
of Snowmass Village due to accidental litters, as well as a surplus of retired dogs.
The dogs looked healthy. Many were robust with thick double coats, while some
were sleeker with thinner double coats. In their Contract, Krabloonik stated that
they would be transitioning to the heavier, thicker-coated huskies in order to use
fewer dogs on each team and to better equip the dogs to endure the cold winters.
We were told by Krabloonik employees that these younger, sleeker Alaskan
Huskies were the result of accidental breeding.
2. Housing
As for housing, Krabloonik has chosen to do away with the traditional, wooden
dog houses that have historically been utilized at Krabloonik and has replaced
them with plastic igloos. The igloos were filled with a layer of clean straw. All of
the plastic igloos were in fair to good condition except for one that had been
chewed so much that it did not provide adequate shelter. We were told by the staff
that they were planning on replacing this shelter with a new one.
3. Staff Reports
Bland and I spoke with a total of 11 current employees during our inspection, all of
whom were cooperative and seemed happy to answer our questions. We asked
each of them if they had any concerns or complaints – none had any to report.
As a side note, I have spoken separately with two former Krabloonik mushers who
reported that Krabloonik has neglected the dogs and failed to abide by their
contractual obligations. As a Review Committee member, after speaking at length
with each of the two mushers, on separate occasions, with the conversations
occurring years apart, I promptly reported each conversation to Town of
Snowmass Village attorney, John Dresser, as well as the Pet Animal Care Facilities
Act Program Section Chief at Colorado Department of Agriculture, Nick Fisher.
4. Food and Water
As for food and water, all of the water cans were clean and were at least half full
when we toured the kennel. We asked to see the dog food, and the dogs are fed a
quality feed, Pro Pac, which is nutritionally balanced and high in protein. We also
observed food being prepared for the dogs, and it was mixed with a generous
portion of beef fat. The employees reported that they give treats to the dogs
regularly throughout the day.
5. Operational Numbers
Krabloonik reports that it is currently running 12 sleds a day, usually with 8 dogs
to a sled. They run 4 sleds three times a day. That means that 96 dogs are being
used to give tours each day. That number may be lower because we were told that
some dogs are run twice a day. As stated previously, Krabloonik currently houses
about 199 dogs. That means that there are over 100 dogs that are not working on
any given day. Some of the surplus dogs are too young, some are too old, some are
taking the day off from pulling, and some are not being used for other reasons.
6. Tethering
In the “Best Practices” section of their Contract, Krabloonik has agreed to let the
dogs off of their tethers to “free run.” Although they are free-running some of the
days in the winter, the current employees stated that they are so busy with
customers that not all of the retired dogs are getting off their tethers on a regular
basis. Additionally, past mushers have reported that the dogs in the kennel are
rarely released from their tethers in the summer season.
7. Spay/ Neuter Program
The majority of Krabloonik dogs are not neutered. In addition to behavioral issues
that develop in unneutered dogs, there are also physical issues that arise in a
majority of dogs that are not neutered by 7 years of age. This is true in all dogs, not
just sled dogs.
According to past and current mushers, Krabloonik experiences numerous
accidental litters each season due to unsterilized dogs getting loose from their
chains and finding one another. We recommend neutering the dogs not only for
health reasons, but to avoid unwanted litters, as well.
Additionally, neutered dogs, especially males, will coexist much more peacefully
than those that are left intact.
Recommendations
In short, having recently passed a surprise inspection by the Colorado Department
of Agriculture, which took place on Tuesday, January 18, 2022, Krabloonik is, to
the best of my knowledge, currently in good standing with the Colorado
Department of Agriculture’s Pet Animal Care Facilities Act. As stated in the
Contract, “Tenant shall comply with the licensing requirements and the rules and
regulations of the Pet Animal Care Facilities Act…” Additionally, to the best of
my knowledge, Krabloonik is currently in compliance with their Contract.
However, while Krabloonik may be in compliance with the letter of the law and
their contractual obligations, that does not mean that there are not areas for
improvement. Many of our concerned parties have justly observed that these dogs
deserve better. As a Review Committee member, I agree that Krabloonik can do
more to improve the quality of life for the sled dogs and I am making the following
recommendations – made in the spirit of offering best-practices ideas to benefit the
dogs.
In their 2016 Best Practices Plan, Krabloonik listed several ideas to increase the
quality of life for the sled dogs. Although they have not, according to Snowmass
Village, breached their Contract, they have, in my opinion, neglected to follow
through with the majority of their promises:
A. Spay/Neuter Program
The Contract states that Krabloonik will execute a spay/neuter program as needed
“to maintain a healthy and manageable kennel.” As previously stated, Krabloonik
experiences unplanned litters due to unsterilized dogs getting loose from their
chains and finding one another. Additionally, the older dogs often suffer from
hormonally induced medical issues due to the fact that they are not neutered by 7
years of age.
In our experience, the majority of older, female sled dogs that we have cared for at
the Aspen Animal Shelter have benign and malignant mammary tumors that are
discovered by our veterinarians when we spay them. We do see hormonally
induced medical issues in the males, as well, but it is not as common as the
mammary tumors in the females. We understand that Krabloonik wants to wait to
neuter their dogs until they have a chance to see how well they mature, pull, etc. in
order to decide which ones will be added to the breeding program, but it is
important to neuter them at some point earlier than 7 years of age in order to avoid
the health issues discussed above.
By neutering the dogs, Krabloonik will have fewer surplus animals and a healthier
population. I recommend that Krabloonik follow through with their spay/neuter
program and neuter a majority of their dogs to avoid the health and behavioral
issues described in detail above.
In the past, Friends of the Aspen Animal Shelter has paid to neuter over
100 Krabloonik dogs, and is ready and willing to continue this program into the
future. Krabloonik has not requested spay/neuter assistance from Friends of the
Aspen Animal Shelter since 2015.
B. Adoptions
The Contract provides that Krabloonik will “work with the Aspen Animal
Shelter…as well as any other organization that would like to help adopt out our
retired friends.” Krabloonik currently has approximately 33 retired sled dogs that
are available for adoption. They agree, in their contract, to work with outside
organizations to help place their dogs. The Aspen Animal Shelter occasionally
refers people to Krabloonik when they express an interest in adopting a sled dog,
but Krabloonik has chosen to place their dogs on their own as opposed to bringing
them to the Aspen Animal Shelter. Mr. Phillips has stated that he fears that placing
his dogs in shelters might create the appearance that he is dumping his dogs. He
has also expressed that many of the dogs will deteriorate in a shelter environment
when removed from their familiar home at Krabloonik.
It is worth noting that Mr. Phillips has expressed a desire to reduce his kennel to
under 100 dogs. To begin the process, Krabloonik delivered 4 sled dogs to the
Aspen Animal Shelter on Wednesday, January 26, 2022. Their names are Mayhem,
Aries, Orion and Emerald. The Aspen Animal Shelter is providing sanctuary for
the dogs while simultaneously making them available for adoption. The dogs
appear to be in good health. Aspen Animal Shelter veterinarian, Dr. Jennifer Davis,
examined all 4 dogs and can answer more specific questions about their condition
upon request.
The Aspen Animal Shelter has taken in over 100 Krabloonik sled dogs over the
past 30 years, and except for a few, almost all of them have been adopted by
responsible, loving owners. (contacts available upon request).
However, Mr. Phillips is not wrong in being wary of who adopts these dogs,
because they often have a tough time transitioning when placed in homes that lack
an understanding of their specific needs. Although socialized as sled dogs, the
Krabloonik dogs, in our past experiences, are often under-socialized as pets, and
display behaviors ranging from, but not limited to, being wary of new people,
uncomfortable in new settings and situations, going to the bathroom inside the
home, etc. These behaviors are not unique to Krabloonik dogs. From experience, I
can state that these behaviors are common in many sled dogs, as well as non-
working dogs, that are raised in a kennel setting and not socialized with new
people, places and things outside of the kennel property when they are young.
C. Tethering
The Contract requires Krabloonik to maintain “a humane tethering practice along
with an excellent off-tether program that ensures each individual sled dog is treated
as an individual and all of its needs are met.” Based on my thirty years of
experience with sled dogs, tethering is far from ideal. It is more cost-efficient than
quality kennel fencing, but tethered dogs that are not regularly exercised off-leash
develop negative behaviors, ranging from running in circles to neurotic pacing. Not
only do the dogs display these behaviors while tethered, but they will often
continue to circle and pace when released from their tethers. Based on our past
experience with some of the dogs that the Aspen Animal Shelter has received from
Krabloonik, it takes time for them to relax their bodies and their minds and release
themselves from these learned behaviors.
I am not insinuating that kenneled dogs (as compared to tethered dogs) do not
display any negative behaviors. Many dogs who live in kennels display cage
aggression, chew on kennel doors, etc. Whether kenneled or tethered, every dog
needs time, outside of a kennel or off a tether, to exercise its mind and body.
When off-tether, non-aggressive dogs deserve to interact with one another. I
completely understand that many dogs will fight, mate, etc. when interacting off-
leash, and that is why off-leash interaction requires a knowledgeable, responsible
staff to supervise them and determine which dogs are safe to place together, which
dogs should be kept on their own, etc.
In my opinion, in addition to pulling a sled, the dogs deserve to be released from
their tethers daily. Additionally, in my opinion, Krabloonik does not have “an
excellent off-tether program” as they promised in their contract.
D. Record-Keeping
The Town of Snowmass Village and Krabloonik would benefit from better record-
keeping. There should be frequent surveys of the yard in which each dog is
identified on a chart with photographs, specific descriptions, medical records, etc.
so that all dogs will be accounted for and all parties involved will feel comfortable
with record-keeping. Previous mushers have accused Krabloonik of replacing the
identities of dead dogs with new replacements in order to cover up undocumented
deaths. A more robust record-keeping program would help to allay these
concerns.
E. Web Cameras
Additionally, if Krabloonik wants to be more transparent about its operations, I
recommend the installation of web cameras on the property so that the public can
watch the dogs while they are socializing in the yards via the Krabloonik web
site. Not only will the cameras verify that the dogs are being rotated off-tether, but
the cameras will also enhance Krabloonik’s reputation and serve as great
entertainment for the public to log in and watch the dogs play.
F. Indoor/Outdoor Facility
For those who want to the dogs off their tethers, it is possible to create a tether-free
facility to shelter the Krabloonik dogs from the elements while allowing them to
live an indoor/outdoor life. Providing shelter from the elements and removing them
from their tethers is not impossible, but it will require investment. In my opinion,
the investment would be worthwhile for the dogs and for the business.
I have spoken with Mr. Phillips regarding his numbers, and he is intent on reducing
his kennel to under 100 dogs. I have sketched a simple 3,200 sq. ft. kennel that
will house approximately 100 dogs. The steel building will house up to 100 dogs
with 80 indoor kennels. Dogs that have proven themselves to be safe with others
will live together as a pack – allowing for the ability to house 100 dogs in an 80-
dog kennel. Obviously, the number of kennels can be increased by spending more
money and increasing the square footage of the building.
Garage doors will line the walls so that they can be raised each day in order to
allow fresh air and sunlight to enter the structure. The garage doors could be left
open at night except when deemed necessary to be closed during the colder
months. The outer walls will have 5 yards attached so that the outside areas are
easily accessed and used to rotate the dogs on a regular basis. Thus, the dogs will
have a structure to protect them from the elements and keep them warm in the
winter and cool in the summer. When weather permits, packs of dogs that are
deemed to be safe to be grouped together can spend their nights in the yards and
can be rotated inside when the first employee shift starts each morning.
G. Dog Park
I recommend the creation of a dog park on the property in which different groups
of dogs can visit with employees and visitors in a relaxed setting away from the
kennel structure. A compatible group of dogs can even spend their nights outside
together when weather permits. The dogs will benefit from the exercise and
socialization.
H. Purchase Option Acceleration
One last idea is that if Mr. and Mrs. Phillips are interested in closing Krabloonik
because they are overwhelmed by the operation, as well as the outside pressure to
make changes to benefit the dogs, it might be a win-win for Snowmass Village to
allow them to exercise their “Purchase Option” earlier than allowed in the contract
(as described in the lease under Section 16.a.), by paying the “Option Price” of
$2,300,000.00. Once exercised, they will own “Lot 45 of the Divide Subdivision
and all improvements located thereon from the Landlord.” The property is
currently worth significantly more than the Option Price. Mr. and Mrs. Phillips
may decide to collect their money and leave earlier than the 2025 purchase option.
Summary
While preparing this report, the only remaining volunteer on the Review
Committee other than me, Bland Nesbit, has resigned due to the controversy
surrounding Krabloonik. Bland has determined that it is too difficult to find peace
with her concern for the dogs and the minimum requirements allowed by law. The
Review Committee members were asked by Snowmass Village to “inspect and
review the operation of the Krabloonik Kennels to determine the extent to which
Tenant is complying with the Best Practices.” The Review Committee has
faithfully and candidly conducted its duties and has consistently determined that
Krabloonik has complied with their minimum contractual requirements.
Through this supplemental report, I have elected to use my voice in order to help
us find common ground and some sense of resolve regarding this controversial
dog-sledding operation. As Krabloonik and the Town of Snowmass Village move
forward, I suggest that the Krabloonik lease be amended to eliminate abstract ideas
and aspirations that are set forth in the Best Practices section, and to provide for
specific, tangible rules for Krabloonik to follow. The dogs will benefit, and clear,
concise language will eliminate subjectivity and confusion.
As the last standing member of the Review Committee, these are my observations
and recommendations, and I am happy to discuss them further in order to work
through the issues and find a solution for all constituents – most importantly, the
dogs.
- Seth Sachson, Krabloonik Best Practices Review Committee